Multiculturalism, interculturalism and citizenship

Nasar Meer, Tariq Modood

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    In this chapter we engage with some recent authors who believe that an alternative to multiculturalism must be sought in order to understand and live with diversity. These authors are not anti-diversity, on the contrary, but they share the view that multiculturalism is no longer a persuasive intellectual or policy approach. For example, the Council of Europe’s White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue (2008) included the finding that the majority of practitioners and NGOs across Europe had come to the conclusion that multiculturalism was no longer fit for purpose, and needed to be replaced by a form of interculturalism. Similar views were expressed in the UNESCO World Report, Investing in Cultural Diversity and Intercultural Dialogue (2008). More recently still, Ted Cantle (2012: 2) has described interculturalism ‘as an opportunity to replace multiculturalism as a conceptual and policy framework’, while Maxwell et al (2012: 429) maintain that ‘Interculturalism represents a gain over Multiculturalism while pursuing the same set of most uncontroversial political ends…’. These statements therefore invite the question: in what ways – if at all - is interculturalism different, substantively or otherwise, from multiculturalism?
    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMulticulturalism and Interculturalism
    Subtitle of host publicationDebating the Dividing Lines
    EditorsNasar Meer, Tariq Modood, Ricard Zapata-Barrero
    PublisherEdinburgh University Press
    ISBN (Print)9781474407083
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

    Fingerprint

    multicultural society
    citizenship
    dialogue
    Council of Europe
    policy approach
    UNESCO
    cultural diversity
    intellectual
    non-governmental organization

    Keywords

    • interculturalism
    • multicultural society
    • disproportionation
    • contemporary society

    Cite this

    Meer, N., & Modood, T. (2016). Multiculturalism, interculturalism and citizenship. In N. Meer, T. Modood, & R. Zapata-Barrero (Eds.), Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: Debating the Dividing Lines Edinburgh University Press.
    Meer, Nasar ; Modood, Tariq. / Multiculturalism, interculturalism and citizenship. Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: Debating the Dividing Lines. editor / Nasar Meer ; Tariq Modood ; Ricard Zapata-Barrero . Edinburgh University Press, 2016.
    @inbook{6a60d3a7b92346eda70bd0795c5e50a7,
    title = "Multiculturalism, interculturalism and citizenship",
    abstract = "In this chapter we engage with some recent authors who believe that an alternative to multiculturalism must be sought in order to understand and live with diversity. These authors are not anti-diversity, on the contrary, but they share the view that multiculturalism is no longer a persuasive intellectual or policy approach. For example, the Council of Europe’s White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue (2008) included the finding that the majority of practitioners and NGOs across Europe had come to the conclusion that multiculturalism was no longer fit for purpose, and needed to be replaced by a form of interculturalism. Similar views were expressed in the UNESCO World Report, Investing in Cultural Diversity and Intercultural Dialogue (2008). More recently still, Ted Cantle (2012: 2) has described interculturalism ‘as an opportunity to replace multiculturalism as a conceptual and policy framework’, while Maxwell et al (2012: 429) maintain that ‘Interculturalism represents a gain over Multiculturalism while pursuing the same set of most uncontroversial political ends…’. These statements therefore invite the question: in what ways – if at all - is interculturalism different, substantively or otherwise, from multiculturalism?",
    keywords = "interculturalism, multicultural society, disproportionation, contemporary society",
    author = "Nasar Meer and Tariq Modood",
    year = "2016",
    month = "2",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781474407083",
    editor = "Nasar Meer and Tariq Modood and {Zapata-Barrero }, Ricard",
    booktitle = "Multiculturalism and Interculturalism",
    publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",

    }

    Meer, N & Modood, T 2016, Multiculturalism, interculturalism and citizenship. in N Meer, T Modood & R Zapata-Barrero (eds), Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: Debating the Dividing Lines. Edinburgh University Press.

    Multiculturalism, interculturalism and citizenship. / Meer, Nasar; Modood, Tariq.

    Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: Debating the Dividing Lines. ed. / Nasar Meer; Tariq Modood; Ricard Zapata-Barrero . Edinburgh University Press, 2016.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Multiculturalism, interculturalism and citizenship

    AU - Meer, Nasar

    AU - Modood, Tariq

    PY - 2016/2/1

    Y1 - 2016/2/1

    N2 - In this chapter we engage with some recent authors who believe that an alternative to multiculturalism must be sought in order to understand and live with diversity. These authors are not anti-diversity, on the contrary, but they share the view that multiculturalism is no longer a persuasive intellectual or policy approach. For example, the Council of Europe’s White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue (2008) included the finding that the majority of practitioners and NGOs across Europe had come to the conclusion that multiculturalism was no longer fit for purpose, and needed to be replaced by a form of interculturalism. Similar views were expressed in the UNESCO World Report, Investing in Cultural Diversity and Intercultural Dialogue (2008). More recently still, Ted Cantle (2012: 2) has described interculturalism ‘as an opportunity to replace multiculturalism as a conceptual and policy framework’, while Maxwell et al (2012: 429) maintain that ‘Interculturalism represents a gain over Multiculturalism while pursuing the same set of most uncontroversial political ends…’. These statements therefore invite the question: in what ways – if at all - is interculturalism different, substantively or otherwise, from multiculturalism?

    AB - In this chapter we engage with some recent authors who believe that an alternative to multiculturalism must be sought in order to understand and live with diversity. These authors are not anti-diversity, on the contrary, but they share the view that multiculturalism is no longer a persuasive intellectual or policy approach. For example, the Council of Europe’s White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue (2008) included the finding that the majority of practitioners and NGOs across Europe had come to the conclusion that multiculturalism was no longer fit for purpose, and needed to be replaced by a form of interculturalism. Similar views were expressed in the UNESCO World Report, Investing in Cultural Diversity and Intercultural Dialogue (2008). More recently still, Ted Cantle (2012: 2) has described interculturalism ‘as an opportunity to replace multiculturalism as a conceptual and policy framework’, while Maxwell et al (2012: 429) maintain that ‘Interculturalism represents a gain over Multiculturalism while pursuing the same set of most uncontroversial political ends…’. These statements therefore invite the question: in what ways – if at all - is interculturalism different, substantively or otherwise, from multiculturalism?

    KW - interculturalism

    KW - multicultural society

    KW - disproportionation

    KW - contemporary society

    UR - http://www.euppublishing.com/book/9781474407090?template=toc

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9781474407083

    BT - Multiculturalism and Interculturalism

    A2 - Meer, Nasar

    A2 - Modood, Tariq

    A2 - Zapata-Barrero , Ricard

    PB - Edinburgh University Press

    ER -

    Meer N, Modood T. Multiculturalism, interculturalism and citizenship. In Meer N, Modood T, Zapata-Barrero R, editors, Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: Debating the Dividing Lines. Edinburgh University Press. 2016