Motor competence assessment in young children: convergent validity between the KTK and MOT 4-6 test batteries

Farid Bardid, Floris Huyben, Frederik J A Deconinck, Jan Seghers, Kristine De Martelaer, Matthieu Lenoir

Research output: Contribution to journalConference Contribution

Abstract

Objective: The development of motor competence in early childhood substantially contributes to successful engagement in sports and other physical activities. In view of the decreasing levels of physical activity and motor skills in children over the past decades, an appropriate assessment and monitoring of motor competence in early childhood is invaluable, for both research and practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the convergent validity between two motor competence assessment tools: the Körperkoordinations Test für Kinder (KTK) and the Motoriktest für Vier- bis Sechsjährige Kinder (MOT 4-6).
Methods and results: Five hundred and thirty 5- and 6- year-old children (277 ♂ and 253 ♀; mean age = 5.95; SD = 0.57) were tested by practiced assessors on the KTK and MOT 4-6 during the same day. From the raw scores, a Motor Quotient was calculated based on normative data of the KTK and MOT 4-6. A Pearson correlation demonstrated a moderately strong positive association between KTK Motor Quotient and MOT 4-6 Motor Quotient (r = 0.605). Crosstabs showed a fair level of agreement between the two tests (K = 0.313; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: These findings show that some evidence of convergent validity between KTK and MOT 4-6 is provided in present study. However, because of the low level of agreement between KTK and MOT 4-6, practitioners and/or clinicians need to be aware of possible categorisation errors when using the KTK or MOT 4-6 test to detect motor impairments.

Fingerprint

Mental Competency
Exercise
Motor Skills
Sports
Research

Keywords

  • motor competence
  • test battery
  • validity

Cite this

Bardid, Farid ; Huyben, Floris ; Deconinck, Frederik J A ; Seghers, Jan ; De Martelaer, Kristine ; Lenoir, Matthieu. / Motor competence assessment in young children : convergent validity between the KTK and MOT 4-6 test batteries. In: Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 36, No. suppl. pp. S60-S60.
@article{8268e2372c9e439ab7459fb03fe84949,
title = "Motor competence assessment in young children: convergent validity between the KTK and MOT 4-6 test batteries",
abstract = "Objective: The development of motor competence in early childhood substantially contributes to successful engagement in sports and other physical activities. In view of the decreasing levels of physical activity and motor skills in children over the past decades, an appropriate assessment and monitoring of motor competence in early childhood is invaluable, for both research and practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the convergent validity between two motor competence assessment tools: the K{\"o}rperkoordinations Test f{\"u}r Kinder (KTK) and the Motoriktest f{\"u}r Vier- bis Sechsj{\"a}hrige Kinder (MOT 4-6). Methods and results: Five hundred and thirty 5- and 6- year-old children (277 ♂ and 253 ♀; mean age = 5.95; SD = 0.57) were tested by practiced assessors on the KTK and MOT 4-6 during the same day. From the raw scores, a Motor Quotient was calculated based on normative data of the KTK and MOT 4-6. A Pearson correlation demonstrated a moderately strong positive association between KTK Motor Quotient and MOT 4-6 Motor Quotient (r = 0.605). Crosstabs showed a fair level of agreement between the two tests (K = 0.313; p < 0.001). Conclusion: These findings show that some evidence of convergent validity between KTK and MOT 4-6 is provided in present study. However, because of the low level of agreement between KTK and MOT 4-6, practitioners and/or clinicians need to be aware of possible categorisation errors when using the KTK or MOT 4-6 test to detect motor impairments.",
keywords = "motor competence, test battery, validity",
author = "Farid Bardid and Floris Huyben and Deconinck, {Frederik J A} and Jan Seghers and {De Martelaer}, Kristine and Matthieu Lenoir",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1123/jsep.36.s1.s79",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "S60--S60",
journal = "Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology",
issn = "0895-2779",
number = "suppl.",

}

Motor competence assessment in young children : convergent validity between the KTK and MOT 4-6 test batteries. / Bardid, Farid; Huyben, Floris; Deconinck, Frederik J A; Seghers, Jan; De Martelaer, Kristine; Lenoir, Matthieu.

In: Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Vol. 36, No. suppl., 31.10.2014, p. S60-S60.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference Contribution

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor competence assessment in young children

T2 - Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

AU - Bardid, Farid

AU - Huyben, Floris

AU - Deconinck, Frederik J A

AU - Seghers, Jan

AU - De Martelaer, Kristine

AU - Lenoir, Matthieu

PY - 2014/10/31

Y1 - 2014/10/31

N2 - Objective: The development of motor competence in early childhood substantially contributes to successful engagement in sports and other physical activities. In view of the decreasing levels of physical activity and motor skills in children over the past decades, an appropriate assessment and monitoring of motor competence in early childhood is invaluable, for both research and practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the convergent validity between two motor competence assessment tools: the Körperkoordinations Test für Kinder (KTK) and the Motoriktest für Vier- bis Sechsjährige Kinder (MOT 4-6). Methods and results: Five hundred and thirty 5- and 6- year-old children (277 ♂ and 253 ♀; mean age = 5.95; SD = 0.57) were tested by practiced assessors on the KTK and MOT 4-6 during the same day. From the raw scores, a Motor Quotient was calculated based on normative data of the KTK and MOT 4-6. A Pearson correlation demonstrated a moderately strong positive association between KTK Motor Quotient and MOT 4-6 Motor Quotient (r = 0.605). Crosstabs showed a fair level of agreement between the two tests (K = 0.313; p < 0.001). Conclusion: These findings show that some evidence of convergent validity between KTK and MOT 4-6 is provided in present study. However, because of the low level of agreement between KTK and MOT 4-6, practitioners and/or clinicians need to be aware of possible categorisation errors when using the KTK or MOT 4-6 test to detect motor impairments.

AB - Objective: The development of motor competence in early childhood substantially contributes to successful engagement in sports and other physical activities. In view of the decreasing levels of physical activity and motor skills in children over the past decades, an appropriate assessment and monitoring of motor competence in early childhood is invaluable, for both research and practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the convergent validity between two motor competence assessment tools: the Körperkoordinations Test für Kinder (KTK) and the Motoriktest für Vier- bis Sechsjährige Kinder (MOT 4-6). Methods and results: Five hundred and thirty 5- and 6- year-old children (277 ♂ and 253 ♀; mean age = 5.95; SD = 0.57) were tested by practiced assessors on the KTK and MOT 4-6 during the same day. From the raw scores, a Motor Quotient was calculated based on normative data of the KTK and MOT 4-6. A Pearson correlation demonstrated a moderately strong positive association between KTK Motor Quotient and MOT 4-6 Motor Quotient (r = 0.605). Crosstabs showed a fair level of agreement between the two tests (K = 0.313; p < 0.001). Conclusion: These findings show that some evidence of convergent validity between KTK and MOT 4-6 is provided in present study. However, because of the low level of agreement between KTK and MOT 4-6, practitioners and/or clinicians need to be aware of possible categorisation errors when using the KTK or MOT 4-6 test to detect motor impairments.

KW - motor competence

KW - test battery

KW - validity

U2 - 10.1123/jsep.36.s1.s79

DO - 10.1123/jsep.36.s1.s79

M3 - Conference Contribution

VL - 36

SP - S60-S60

JO - Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

JF - Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

SN - 0895-2779

IS - suppl.

ER -