Motivational, volitional and multiple goal predictors of walking in people with Type 2 diabetes

Masoumeh Namadian, Justin Presseau, Margaret C. Watson, Christine M. Bond, Falko F. Sniehotta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes is a major public health problem. Effective diabetes self-management involves people engaging in multiple health behaviours, including physical activity. Walking is an effective, accessible and inexpensive form of physical activity, yet many people with Type 2 diabetes do not meet recommended levels. The present study aimed to: 1) identify demographic, motivational and volitional factors predictive of walking in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 2) test whether accounting for the perceived impact of other goal pursuits (goal facilitation and goal conflict) improved the prediction of walking. Methods: A theory-based cross-sectional study using the Health Action Process Approach was conducted in adults with Type 2 diabetes across Scotland. Assuming a 50% response rate 1000 questionnaires were mailed to achieve the target sample size (N = 500). Demographic information was collected, and intentional (outcome expectations, social support, risk perceptions), motivational (intention, self-efficacy), volitional (action planning, action control) and multiple goal (goal conflict, goal facilitation) factors were assessed as predictors of physical activity in general and walking specifically. Results: The final sample comprised 411 respondents. The majority (60%) were non-adherent to physical activity recommendations. Of 411 respondents, 356 provided walking data. Body Mass Index and age were the only demographic and anthropometric factors predictive of walking (overall R2 = 0.04). When motivational factors were added, intention and self-efficacy added to the prediction (overall R2 = 0.07). When volitional factors were added, only action control was predictive of walking (overall R2 = 0.08). Finally, goal facilitation explained an additional 7% variance in walking when added to the model (final overall R2 = 0.15). Conclusion: There was low adherence with physical activity recommendations in general and walking in particular. When testing predictors of motivational, volitional and competing goal constructs together, action control and goal facilitation emerged as predictors of walking. Future research should consider how walking can be embedded synergistically alongside other goal pursuits and how action control may help to ensure that they are pursued.
LanguageEnglish
Pages83-93
Number of pages11
JournalPsychology of Sport and Exercise
Volume26
Early online date18 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Walking
Demography
Self Efficacy
Health Behavior
Scotland
Self Care
Social Support
Sample Size
Body Mass Index
Public Health
Cross-Sectional Studies
Health

Keywords

  • action control
  • goal conflict
  • goal facilitation
  • health action process approach
  • motivation
  • physical activity
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • volition
  • walking

Cite this

Namadian, Masoumeh ; Presseau, Justin ; Watson, Margaret C. ; Bond, Christine M. ; Sniehotta, Falko F. / Motivational, volitional and multiple goal predictors of walking in people with Type 2 diabetes. In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016 ; Vol. 26. pp. 83-93.
@article{b3119ad0e1f0403585f30ca817cce0de,
title = "Motivational, volitional and multiple goal predictors of walking in people with Type 2 diabetes",
abstract = "Background: Type 2 diabetes is a major public health problem. Effective diabetes self-management involves people engaging in multiple health behaviours, including physical activity. Walking is an effective, accessible and inexpensive form of physical activity, yet many people with Type 2 diabetes do not meet recommended levels. The present study aimed to: 1) identify demographic, motivational and volitional factors predictive of walking in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 2) test whether accounting for the perceived impact of other goal pursuits (goal facilitation and goal conflict) improved the prediction of walking. Methods: A theory-based cross-sectional study using the Health Action Process Approach was conducted in adults with Type 2 diabetes across Scotland. Assuming a 50{\%} response rate 1000 questionnaires were mailed to achieve the target sample size (N = 500). Demographic information was collected, and intentional (outcome expectations, social support, risk perceptions), motivational (intention, self-efficacy), volitional (action planning, action control) and multiple goal (goal conflict, goal facilitation) factors were assessed as predictors of physical activity in general and walking specifically. Results: The final sample comprised 411 respondents. The majority (60{\%}) were non-adherent to physical activity recommendations. Of 411 respondents, 356 provided walking data. Body Mass Index and age were the only demographic and anthropometric factors predictive of walking (overall R2 = 0.04). When motivational factors were added, intention and self-efficacy added to the prediction (overall R2 = 0.07). When volitional factors were added, only action control was predictive of walking (overall R2 = 0.08). Finally, goal facilitation explained an additional 7{\%} variance in walking when added to the model (final overall R2 = 0.15). Conclusion: There was low adherence with physical activity recommendations in general and walking in particular. When testing predictors of motivational, volitional and competing goal constructs together, action control and goal facilitation emerged as predictors of walking. Future research should consider how walking can be embedded synergistically alongside other goal pursuits and how action control may help to ensure that they are pursued.",
keywords = "action control, goal conflict, goal facilitation, health action process approach, motivation, physical activity, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, volition, walking",
author = "Masoumeh Namadian and Justin Presseau and Watson, {Margaret C.} and Bond, {Christine M.} and Sniehotta, {Falko F.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.06.006",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "83--93",
journal = "Psychology of Sport and Exercise",
issn = "1469-0292",

}

Motivational, volitional and multiple goal predictors of walking in people with Type 2 diabetes. / Namadian, Masoumeh; Presseau, Justin; Watson, Margaret C.; Bond, Christine M.; Sniehotta, Falko F.

In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Vol. 26, 30.09.2016, p. 83-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motivational, volitional and multiple goal predictors of walking in people with Type 2 diabetes

AU - Namadian, Masoumeh

AU - Presseau, Justin

AU - Watson, Margaret C.

AU - Bond, Christine M.

AU - Sniehotta, Falko F.

PY - 2016/9/30

Y1 - 2016/9/30

N2 - Background: Type 2 diabetes is a major public health problem. Effective diabetes self-management involves people engaging in multiple health behaviours, including physical activity. Walking is an effective, accessible and inexpensive form of physical activity, yet many people with Type 2 diabetes do not meet recommended levels. The present study aimed to: 1) identify demographic, motivational and volitional factors predictive of walking in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 2) test whether accounting for the perceived impact of other goal pursuits (goal facilitation and goal conflict) improved the prediction of walking. Methods: A theory-based cross-sectional study using the Health Action Process Approach was conducted in adults with Type 2 diabetes across Scotland. Assuming a 50% response rate 1000 questionnaires were mailed to achieve the target sample size (N = 500). Demographic information was collected, and intentional (outcome expectations, social support, risk perceptions), motivational (intention, self-efficacy), volitional (action planning, action control) and multiple goal (goal conflict, goal facilitation) factors were assessed as predictors of physical activity in general and walking specifically. Results: The final sample comprised 411 respondents. The majority (60%) were non-adherent to physical activity recommendations. Of 411 respondents, 356 provided walking data. Body Mass Index and age were the only demographic and anthropometric factors predictive of walking (overall R2 = 0.04). When motivational factors were added, intention and self-efficacy added to the prediction (overall R2 = 0.07). When volitional factors were added, only action control was predictive of walking (overall R2 = 0.08). Finally, goal facilitation explained an additional 7% variance in walking when added to the model (final overall R2 = 0.15). Conclusion: There was low adherence with physical activity recommendations in general and walking in particular. When testing predictors of motivational, volitional and competing goal constructs together, action control and goal facilitation emerged as predictors of walking. Future research should consider how walking can be embedded synergistically alongside other goal pursuits and how action control may help to ensure that they are pursued.

AB - Background: Type 2 diabetes is a major public health problem. Effective diabetes self-management involves people engaging in multiple health behaviours, including physical activity. Walking is an effective, accessible and inexpensive form of physical activity, yet many people with Type 2 diabetes do not meet recommended levels. The present study aimed to: 1) identify demographic, motivational and volitional factors predictive of walking in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 2) test whether accounting for the perceived impact of other goal pursuits (goal facilitation and goal conflict) improved the prediction of walking. Methods: A theory-based cross-sectional study using the Health Action Process Approach was conducted in adults with Type 2 diabetes across Scotland. Assuming a 50% response rate 1000 questionnaires were mailed to achieve the target sample size (N = 500). Demographic information was collected, and intentional (outcome expectations, social support, risk perceptions), motivational (intention, self-efficacy), volitional (action planning, action control) and multiple goal (goal conflict, goal facilitation) factors were assessed as predictors of physical activity in general and walking specifically. Results: The final sample comprised 411 respondents. The majority (60%) were non-adherent to physical activity recommendations. Of 411 respondents, 356 provided walking data. Body Mass Index and age were the only demographic and anthropometric factors predictive of walking (overall R2 = 0.04). When motivational factors were added, intention and self-efficacy added to the prediction (overall R2 = 0.07). When volitional factors were added, only action control was predictive of walking (overall R2 = 0.08). Finally, goal facilitation explained an additional 7% variance in walking when added to the model (final overall R2 = 0.15). Conclusion: There was low adherence with physical activity recommendations in general and walking in particular. When testing predictors of motivational, volitional and competing goal constructs together, action control and goal facilitation emerged as predictors of walking. Future research should consider how walking can be embedded synergistically alongside other goal pursuits and how action control may help to ensure that they are pursued.

KW - action control

KW - goal conflict

KW - goal facilitation

KW - health action process approach

KW - motivation

KW - physical activity

KW - Type 2 diabetes mellitus

KW - volition

KW - walking

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.06.006

DO - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.06.006

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 83

EP - 93

JO - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

T2 - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

JF - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

SN - 1469-0292

ER -