More quality through competitive quality awards?: an impact assessment framework

Tony Bovaird, Elke Löffler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Given the growing international phenomenon of quality award competitions for public sector services and organizations it is timely to assess their impacts. While award schemes have become a popular marketing tool to increase the visibility of award organizers, it is unclear what impact they have on various dimensions of quality - organizational quality, service quality and the quality of life of citizens. So far, quality awards are a theory-free area with few evaluations being undertaken by the academic community. By the same token, quality awards organizers have not shown a great inclination to invest in impact assessments. Yet, major questions exist on the extent to which quality awards live up to their claims to help applicants and non-applicants to improve quality. This article maps existing pieces of evidence against an impact assessment framework and identifies the research gaps to be addressed by the academic community and public sector organizations. Points for practitioners Competitive quality awards can have benefits in terms of innovation, organizational learning, and reputational promotion. However, for the applicants these benefits come at a price - the innovations and the learning only occur if the organization undertakes the application in a way which builds these benefits into the process. Moreover, the promotional benefits depend on which awards they win, particularly on how well publicized they are. For organizers, too, a cost-benefit calculus is necessary - while competitive awards may be cheaper to organize than accreditation schemes, they may not lead to such careful preparation, with consequently lower impacts.

LanguageEnglish
Pages383-401
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Review of Administrative Sciences
Volume75
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2009

Fingerprint

applicant
public sector
innovation
learning organization
accreditation
community
quality of life
marketing
promotion
citizen
organization
costs
evaluation
learning
evidence

Keywords

  • competitive award schemes
  • innovation
  • organizational learning
  • quality awards
  • self-promotion

Cite this

@article{903eaaff8bf742fb906303a59929d12b,
title = "More quality through competitive quality awards?: an impact assessment framework",
abstract = "Given the growing international phenomenon of quality award competitions for public sector services and organizations it is timely to assess their impacts. While award schemes have become a popular marketing tool to increase the visibility of award organizers, it is unclear what impact they have on various dimensions of quality - organizational quality, service quality and the quality of life of citizens. So far, quality awards are a theory-free area with few evaluations being undertaken by the academic community. By the same token, quality awards organizers have not shown a great inclination to invest in impact assessments. Yet, major questions exist on the extent to which quality awards live up to their claims to help applicants and non-applicants to improve quality. This article maps existing pieces of evidence against an impact assessment framework and identifies the research gaps to be addressed by the academic community and public sector organizations. Points for practitioners Competitive quality awards can have benefits in terms of innovation, organizational learning, and reputational promotion. However, for the applicants these benefits come at a price - the innovations and the learning only occur if the organization undertakes the application in a way which builds these benefits into the process. Moreover, the promotional benefits depend on which awards they win, particularly on how well publicized they are. For organizers, too, a cost-benefit calculus is necessary - while competitive awards may be cheaper to organize than accreditation schemes, they may not lead to such careful preparation, with consequently lower impacts.",
keywords = "competitive award schemes, innovation, organizational learning, quality awards, self-promotion",
author = "Tony Bovaird and Elke L{\"o}ffler",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0020852309337687",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "383--401",
journal = "International Review of Administrative Sciences",
issn = "0020-8523",
number = "3",

}

More quality through competitive quality awards? an impact assessment framework. / Bovaird, Tony; Löffler, Elke.

In: International Review of Administrative Sciences , Vol. 75, No. 3, 01.09.2009, p. 383-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - More quality through competitive quality awards?

T2 - International Review of Administrative Sciences

AU - Bovaird, Tony

AU - Löffler, Elke

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Given the growing international phenomenon of quality award competitions for public sector services and organizations it is timely to assess their impacts. While award schemes have become a popular marketing tool to increase the visibility of award organizers, it is unclear what impact they have on various dimensions of quality - organizational quality, service quality and the quality of life of citizens. So far, quality awards are a theory-free area with few evaluations being undertaken by the academic community. By the same token, quality awards organizers have not shown a great inclination to invest in impact assessments. Yet, major questions exist on the extent to which quality awards live up to their claims to help applicants and non-applicants to improve quality. This article maps existing pieces of evidence against an impact assessment framework and identifies the research gaps to be addressed by the academic community and public sector organizations. Points for practitioners Competitive quality awards can have benefits in terms of innovation, organizational learning, and reputational promotion. However, for the applicants these benefits come at a price - the innovations and the learning only occur if the organization undertakes the application in a way which builds these benefits into the process. Moreover, the promotional benefits depend on which awards they win, particularly on how well publicized they are. For organizers, too, a cost-benefit calculus is necessary - while competitive awards may be cheaper to organize than accreditation schemes, they may not lead to such careful preparation, with consequently lower impacts.

AB - Given the growing international phenomenon of quality award competitions for public sector services and organizations it is timely to assess their impacts. While award schemes have become a popular marketing tool to increase the visibility of award organizers, it is unclear what impact they have on various dimensions of quality - organizational quality, service quality and the quality of life of citizens. So far, quality awards are a theory-free area with few evaluations being undertaken by the academic community. By the same token, quality awards organizers have not shown a great inclination to invest in impact assessments. Yet, major questions exist on the extent to which quality awards live up to their claims to help applicants and non-applicants to improve quality. This article maps existing pieces of evidence against an impact assessment framework and identifies the research gaps to be addressed by the academic community and public sector organizations. Points for practitioners Competitive quality awards can have benefits in terms of innovation, organizational learning, and reputational promotion. However, for the applicants these benefits come at a price - the innovations and the learning only occur if the organization undertakes the application in a way which builds these benefits into the process. Moreover, the promotional benefits depend on which awards they win, particularly on how well publicized they are. For organizers, too, a cost-benefit calculus is necessary - while competitive awards may be cheaper to organize than accreditation schemes, they may not lead to such careful preparation, with consequently lower impacts.

KW - competitive award schemes

KW - innovation

KW - organizational learning

KW - quality awards

KW - self-promotion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350458890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0020852309337687

DO - 10.1177/0020852309337687

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 383

EP - 401

JO - International Review of Administrative Sciences

JF - International Review of Administrative Sciences

SN - 0020-8523

IS - 3

ER -