Modeling the difference in ground-motion magnitude-scaling in small and large earthquakes

John Douglas, Philippe Jousset

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is often the case that ground-motion records for a given area of interest are available in relative abundance for small (Mw < 5) earthquakes but are practically non-existent for larger earthquakes, which have the potential to cause damage to structures. This is a direct consequence of the almost universally observed Gutenberg-Richter relation that a unit increase in magnitude decreases the number of earthquakes observed by a factor of ten (e.g., Frohlich and Davis 1993, Douglas 2003). The productive use of data from small earthquakes for seismic hazard assessments relies on knowledge of how earthquake ground motions scale with magnitude. The majority of ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) are derived, usually by regression analysis, to estimate shaking from earthquakes with Mw ≳ 5 (Douglas 2011), but there is often little consideration given to how they extrapolate to small magnitudes, which are sometimes considered within the hazard integral of probabilistic seismic hazard assessments or for the testing of GMPEs against observations, especially for regions of low-to-moderate seismicity.
LanguageEnglish
Pages504-508
Number of pages5
JournalSeismological Research Letters
Volume82
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

ground motion
earthquakes
scaling
earthquake
hazards
modeling
hazard assessment
seismic hazard
shaking
prediction
predictions
seismicity
regression analysis
relative abundance
hazard
damage
causes
estimates

Keywords

  • ground-motion record
  • magnitude scaling
  • earthquake ground motions

Cite this

@article{5d2152c1cdd04a35a2a81d7d7eb0a213,
title = "Modeling the difference in ground-motion magnitude-scaling in small and large earthquakes",
abstract = "It is often the case that ground-motion records for a given area of interest are available in relative abundance for small (Mw < 5) earthquakes but are practically non-existent for larger earthquakes, which have the potential to cause damage to structures. This is a direct consequence of the almost universally observed Gutenberg-Richter relation that a unit increase in magnitude decreases the number of earthquakes observed by a factor of ten (e.g., Frohlich and Davis 1993, Douglas 2003). The productive use of data from small earthquakes for seismic hazard assessments relies on knowledge of how earthquake ground motions scale with magnitude. The majority of ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) are derived, usually by regression analysis, to estimate shaking from earthquakes with Mw ≳ 5 (Douglas 2011), but there is often little consideration given to how they extrapolate to small magnitudes, which are sometimes considered within the hazard integral of probabilistic seismic hazard assessments or for the testing of GMPEs against observations, especially for regions of low-to-moderate seismicity.",
keywords = "ground-motion record, magnitude scaling, earthquake ground motions",
author = "John Douglas and Philippe Jousset",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1785/gssrl.82.4.504",
language = "English",
volume = "82",
pages = "504--508",
journal = "Seismological Research Letters",
issn = "0895-0695",
number = "4",

}

Modeling the difference in ground-motion magnitude-scaling in small and large earthquakes. / Douglas, John; Jousset, Philippe.

In: Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 82, No. 4, 07.2011, p. 504-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modeling the difference in ground-motion magnitude-scaling in small and large earthquakes

AU - Douglas, John

AU - Jousset, Philippe

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - It is often the case that ground-motion records for a given area of interest are available in relative abundance for small (Mw < 5) earthquakes but are practically non-existent for larger earthquakes, which have the potential to cause damage to structures. This is a direct consequence of the almost universally observed Gutenberg-Richter relation that a unit increase in magnitude decreases the number of earthquakes observed by a factor of ten (e.g., Frohlich and Davis 1993, Douglas 2003). The productive use of data from small earthquakes for seismic hazard assessments relies on knowledge of how earthquake ground motions scale with magnitude. The majority of ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) are derived, usually by regression analysis, to estimate shaking from earthquakes with Mw ≳ 5 (Douglas 2011), but there is often little consideration given to how they extrapolate to small magnitudes, which are sometimes considered within the hazard integral of probabilistic seismic hazard assessments or for the testing of GMPEs against observations, especially for regions of low-to-moderate seismicity.

AB - It is often the case that ground-motion records for a given area of interest are available in relative abundance for small (Mw < 5) earthquakes but are practically non-existent for larger earthquakes, which have the potential to cause damage to structures. This is a direct consequence of the almost universally observed Gutenberg-Richter relation that a unit increase in magnitude decreases the number of earthquakes observed by a factor of ten (e.g., Frohlich and Davis 1993, Douglas 2003). The productive use of data from small earthquakes for seismic hazard assessments relies on knowledge of how earthquake ground motions scale with magnitude. The majority of ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) are derived, usually by regression analysis, to estimate shaking from earthquakes with Mw ≳ 5 (Douglas 2011), but there is often little consideration given to how they extrapolate to small magnitudes, which are sometimes considered within the hazard integral of probabilistic seismic hazard assessments or for the testing of GMPEs against observations, especially for regions of low-to-moderate seismicity.

KW - ground-motion record

KW - magnitude scaling

KW - earthquake ground motions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960090901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1785/gssrl.82.4.504

DO - 10.1785/gssrl.82.4.504

M3 - Article

VL - 82

SP - 504

EP - 508

JO - Seismological Research Letters

T2 - Seismological Research Letters

JF - Seismological Research Letters

SN - 0895-0695

IS - 4

ER -