Modeling of evolving textures using granulometries

Alison Gray, Stephen Marshall, Jennifer McKenzie

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)
94 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter describes a statistical approach to classification of dynamic
texture images, called parallel evolution functions (PEFs). Traditional classification
methods predict texture class membership using comparisons with
a finite set of predefined texture classes and identify the closest class. However,
where texture images arise from a dynamic texture evolving over time,
estimation of a time state in a continuous evolutionary process is required
instead. The PEF approach does this using regression modeling techniques
to predict time state. It is a flexible approach which may be based on any
suitable image features. Many textures are well suited to a morphological
analysis and the PEF approach uses image texture features derived from a
granulometric analysis of the image.
The method is illustrated using both simulated images of Boolean processes
and real images of corrosion. The PEF approach has particular advantages
for training sets containing limited numbers of observations, which
is the case in many real world industrial inspection scenarios and for which
other methods can fail or perform badly.
[41] G.W. Horgan, Mathematical morphology for analysing soil structure from images,
European Journal of Soil Science, vol. 49, pp. 161–173, 1998.
[42] G.W. Horgan, C.A. Reid and C.A. Glasbey, Biological image processing and enhancement,
Image Processing and Analysis, A Practical Approach, R. Baldock and
J. Graham, eds., Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 37–67, 2000.
[43] B.B. Hubbard, The World According to Wavelets: The Story of a Mathematical
Technique in the Making, A.K. Peters Ltd., Wellesley, MA, 1995.
[44] H. Iversen and T. Lonnestad. An evaluation of stochastic models for analysis and
synthesis of gray-scale texture, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 15, pp. 575–585,
1994.
[45] A.K. Jain and F. Farrokhnia, Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters,
Pattern Recognition, vol. 24(12), pp. 1167–1186, 1991.
[46] T. Jossang and F. Feder, The fractal characterization of rough surfaces, Physica
Scripta, vol. T44, pp. 9–14, 1992.
[47] A.K. Katsaggelos and T. Chun-Jen, Iterative image restoration, Handbook of Image
and Video Processing, A. Bovik, ed., Academic Press, London, pp. 208–209, 2000.
[48] M. K¨oppen, C.H. Nowack and G. R¨osel, Pareto-morphology for color image processing,
Proceedings of SCIA99, 11th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis
1, Kangerlussuaq, Greenland, pp. 195–202, 1999.
[49] S. Krishnamachari and R. Chellappa, Multiresolution Gauss-Markov random field
models for texture segmentation, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 6(2),
pp. 251–267, 1997.
[50] T. Kurita and N. Otsu, Texture classification by higher order local autocorrelation
features, Proceedings of ACCV93, Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Osaka,
pp. 175–178, 1993.
[51] S.T. Kyvelidis, L. Lykouropoulos and N. Kouloumbi, Digital system for detecting,
classifying, and fast retrieving corrosion generated defects, Journal of Coatings
Technology, vol. 73(915), pp. 67–73, 2001.
[52] Y. Liu, T. Zhao and J. Zhang, Learning multispectral texture features for cervical
cancer detection, Proceedings of 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical
Imaging: Macro to Nano, pp. 169–172, 2002.
[53] G. McGunnigle and M.J. Chantler, Modeling deposition of surface texture, Electronics
Letters, vol. 37(12), pp. 749–750, 2001.
[54] J. McKenzie, S. Marshall, A.J. Gray and E.R. Dougherty, Morphological texture
analysis using the texture evolution function, International Journal of Pattern
Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol. 17(2), pp. 167–185, 2003.
[55] J. McKenzie, Classification of dynamically evolving textures using evolution functions,
Ph.D. Thesis, University of Strathclyde, UK, 2004.
[56] S.G. Mallat, Multiresolution approximations and wavelet orthonormal bases of
L2(R), Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 315, pp. 69–87,
1989.
[57] S.G. Mallat, A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation,
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol.
11, pp. 674–693, 1989.
[58] B.S. Manjunath and W.Y. Ma, Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image
data, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 18,
pp. 837–842, 1996.
[59] B.S. Manjunath, G.M. Haley and W.Y. Ma, Multiband techniques for texture classification
and segmentation, Handbook of Image and Video Processing, A. Bovik,
ed., Academic Press, London, pp. 367–381, 2000.
[60] G. Matheron, Random Sets and Integral Geometry, Wiley Series in Probability and
Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1975.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing
EditorsStephen Marshall Giovanni L. Sicuranza
Place of PublicationCairo, Egypt
Pages239-271
Number of pages33
Volume6
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Publication series

NameEURASIP Book Series on Signal Processing and Communications
PublisherHindawi Publishing Corporation
Volume6

Keywords

  • parallel evolution functions

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling of evolving textures using granulometries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Gray, A., Marshall, S., & McKenzie, J. (2006). Modeling of evolving textures using granulometries. In S. M. Giovanni L. Sicuranza (Ed.), Advances in Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing (Vol. 6, pp. 239-271). (EURASIP Book Series on Signal Processing and Communications; Vol. 6)..