Model comparison tests of linear factor models in U.K. stock returns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study uses the Bayesian approach of Barillas and Shanken (2018) and the classical approach of Barillas et al. (2018) to conduct model comparison tests of nine linear factor models in U.K. stock returns. The mean-variance efficiency of each factor model is rejected. The Bayesian and classical approaches to model comparison can give different results. Combining the evidence from the two approaches suggests that the six-factor model of Fama and French (2017) with small spread factors provides the best performance among the set of models considered.

LanguageEnglish
Pages281-291
Number of pages11
JournalFinance Research Letters
Volume28
Early online date23 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Stock returns
Model comparison
Bayesian approach
Factors
Mean-variance efficiency

Keywords

  • model comparison
  • Bayesian analysis
  • linear factor models
  • sharpe performance

Cite this

@article{180522630a8f41fc9422c7a1251c0ecd,
title = "Model comparison tests of linear factor models in U.K. stock returns",
abstract = "This study uses the Bayesian approach of Barillas and Shanken (2018) and the classical approach of Barillas et al. (2018) to conduct model comparison tests of nine linear factor models in U.K. stock returns. The mean-variance efficiency of each factor model is rejected. The Bayesian and classical approaches to model comparison can give different results. Combining the evidence from the two approaches suggests that the six-factor model of Fama and French (2017) with small spread factors provides the best performance among the set of models considered.",
keywords = "model comparison, Bayesian analysis, linear factor models, sharpe performance",
author = "Jonathan Fletcher",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.frl.2018.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "281--291",
journal = "Finance Research Letters",
issn = "1544-6123",

}

Model comparison tests of linear factor models in U.K. stock returns. / Fletcher, Jonathan.

In: Finance Research Letters, Vol. 28, 15.03.2019, p. 281-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Model comparison tests of linear factor models in U.K. stock returns

AU - Fletcher, Jonathan

PY - 2019/3/15

Y1 - 2019/3/15

N2 - This study uses the Bayesian approach of Barillas and Shanken (2018) and the classical approach of Barillas et al. (2018) to conduct model comparison tests of nine linear factor models in U.K. stock returns. The mean-variance efficiency of each factor model is rejected. The Bayesian and classical approaches to model comparison can give different results. Combining the evidence from the two approaches suggests that the six-factor model of Fama and French (2017) with small spread factors provides the best performance among the set of models considered.

AB - This study uses the Bayesian approach of Barillas and Shanken (2018) and the classical approach of Barillas et al. (2018) to conduct model comparison tests of nine linear factor models in U.K. stock returns. The mean-variance efficiency of each factor model is rejected. The Bayesian and classical approaches to model comparison can give different results. Combining the evidence from the two approaches suggests that the six-factor model of Fama and French (2017) with small spread factors provides the best performance among the set of models considered.

KW - model comparison

KW - Bayesian analysis

KW - linear factor models

KW - sharpe performance

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/finance-research-letters

U2 - 10.1016/j.frl.2018.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.frl.2018.05.005

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 281

EP - 291

JO - Finance Research Letters

T2 - Finance Research Letters

JF - Finance Research Letters

SN - 1544-6123

ER -