Mixing methodologies to enhance the implementation of healthcare operational research

R.C. Sachdeva, T.M. Williams, J.L. Quigley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Healthcare Operational Research (OR) has had limited success in achieving a sufficient level of stakeholder acceptance to lead to implementation of results. This research study is aimed at combining OR methodologies to achieve greater acceptance of results for organizational change. Patient flow delays in the Paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin were identified using case studies. Patient flow was modelled using hard OR (simulation) using case study findings, with active stakeholder participation, and enhanced with outcomes research. Outcomes research allowed achieving greater clinical relevance of OR findings. Results from hard OR, particularly for politically sensitive issues, were persuasive but inadequate to result in change. Soft OR (cognitive mapping) was used to identify new issues and enhance results. Consequently, the planned PICU expansion was deferred, and resources focused on improving staffing strategies identified independently from both hard and soft OR. These findings suggest that: (1) Outcomes research can play a unique role to enhance results in healthcare OR. (2) After obtaining a holistic understanding of the system using hard and soft OR, stakeholders are willing to implement results from each independently, supporting the development of a common form of knowledge, which is consistent with Mixed-Mode Modelling. (3) Hard OR, enhanced with outcomes research, with active stakeholder participation, and combined with soft OR, results in greater acceptance and sustained organizational change.
LanguageEnglish
Pages159-167
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Operational Research Society
Volume58
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Intensive care units
Pediatrics
Healthcare
Operations research
Methodology
Outcomes research
Acceptance
Patient flow
Intensive care unit
Stakeholders
Organizational change
Stakeholder participation
Modeling
Simulation
Resources
Staffing
New issues
Cognitive mapping

Keywords

  • cognitive mapping
  • simulation
  • health service
  • hospitals
  • multi-methodology
  • outcomes research

Cite this

@article{66f6bd1f7a344f3d95276a823b956268,
title = "Mixing methodologies to enhance the implementation of healthcare operational research",
abstract = "Healthcare Operational Research (OR) has had limited success in achieving a sufficient level of stakeholder acceptance to lead to implementation of results. This research study is aimed at combining OR methodologies to achieve greater acceptance of results for organizational change. Patient flow delays in the Paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin were identified using case studies. Patient flow was modelled using hard OR (simulation) using case study findings, with active stakeholder participation, and enhanced with outcomes research. Outcomes research allowed achieving greater clinical relevance of OR findings. Results from hard OR, particularly for politically sensitive issues, were persuasive but inadequate to result in change. Soft OR (cognitive mapping) was used to identify new issues and enhance results. Consequently, the planned PICU expansion was deferred, and resources focused on improving staffing strategies identified independently from both hard and soft OR. These findings suggest that: (1) Outcomes research can play a unique role to enhance results in healthcare OR. (2) After obtaining a holistic understanding of the system using hard and soft OR, stakeholders are willing to implement results from each independently, supporting the development of a common form of knowledge, which is consistent with Mixed-Mode Modelling. (3) Hard OR, enhanced with outcomes research, with active stakeholder participation, and combined with soft OR, results in greater acceptance and sustained organizational change.",
keywords = "cognitive mapping, simulation, health service, hospitals, multi-methodology, outcomes research",
author = "R.C. Sachdeva and T.M. Williams and J.L. Quigley",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602293",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "159--167",
journal = "Journal of Operational Research Society",
issn = "0160-5682",

}

Mixing methodologies to enhance the implementation of healthcare operational research. / Sachdeva, R.C.; Williams, T.M.; Quigley, J.L.

In: Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 58, 2007, p. 159-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mixing methodologies to enhance the implementation of healthcare operational research

AU - Sachdeva, R.C.

AU - Williams, T.M.

AU - Quigley, J.L.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Healthcare Operational Research (OR) has had limited success in achieving a sufficient level of stakeholder acceptance to lead to implementation of results. This research study is aimed at combining OR methodologies to achieve greater acceptance of results for organizational change. Patient flow delays in the Paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin were identified using case studies. Patient flow was modelled using hard OR (simulation) using case study findings, with active stakeholder participation, and enhanced with outcomes research. Outcomes research allowed achieving greater clinical relevance of OR findings. Results from hard OR, particularly for politically sensitive issues, were persuasive but inadequate to result in change. Soft OR (cognitive mapping) was used to identify new issues and enhance results. Consequently, the planned PICU expansion was deferred, and resources focused on improving staffing strategies identified independently from both hard and soft OR. These findings suggest that: (1) Outcomes research can play a unique role to enhance results in healthcare OR. (2) After obtaining a holistic understanding of the system using hard and soft OR, stakeholders are willing to implement results from each independently, supporting the development of a common form of knowledge, which is consistent with Mixed-Mode Modelling. (3) Hard OR, enhanced with outcomes research, with active stakeholder participation, and combined with soft OR, results in greater acceptance and sustained organizational change.

AB - Healthcare Operational Research (OR) has had limited success in achieving a sufficient level of stakeholder acceptance to lead to implementation of results. This research study is aimed at combining OR methodologies to achieve greater acceptance of results for organizational change. Patient flow delays in the Paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin were identified using case studies. Patient flow was modelled using hard OR (simulation) using case study findings, with active stakeholder participation, and enhanced with outcomes research. Outcomes research allowed achieving greater clinical relevance of OR findings. Results from hard OR, particularly for politically sensitive issues, were persuasive but inadequate to result in change. Soft OR (cognitive mapping) was used to identify new issues and enhance results. Consequently, the planned PICU expansion was deferred, and resources focused on improving staffing strategies identified independently from both hard and soft OR. These findings suggest that: (1) Outcomes research can play a unique role to enhance results in healthcare OR. (2) After obtaining a holistic understanding of the system using hard and soft OR, stakeholders are willing to implement results from each independently, supporting the development of a common form of knowledge, which is consistent with Mixed-Mode Modelling. (3) Hard OR, enhanced with outcomes research, with active stakeholder participation, and combined with soft OR, results in greater acceptance and sustained organizational change.

KW - cognitive mapping

KW - simulation

KW - health service

KW - hospitals

KW - multi-methodology

KW - outcomes research

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602293

U2 - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602293

DO - 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602293

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 159

EP - 167

JO - Journal of Operational Research Society

T2 - Journal of Operational Research Society

JF - Journal of Operational Research Society

SN - 0160-5682

ER -