Missing the point? finding contextual detail in entrepreneurship and small firm scholarship

Dominic Chalmers, Eleanor Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The trajectory of entrepreneurship scholarship can be characterized by a trend towards functionalist approaches. This has arguably led to findings that trade the contextualization of entrepreneurial processes for abstracted theoretical generalizations. We propose a methodological response that draws on ethnomethodology and conversation analysis to form the theoretical basis of a more nuanced empirical conception of the entrepreneur in situ. Our approach addresses current epistemological concerns in entrepreneurship scholarship by prioritizing the practical knowledge and reasoning skills of the entrepreneur. Additionally the proposed methodology provides a solution to an analytical problem confronting scholars who must select from myriad potentially relevant contexts to incorporate into analysis. We conclude our article by identifying some research opportunities that are enabled through adoption of an ethnomethodology/conversation analysis perspective. We hope that scholars may expand upon, complement and challenge current conceptualizations of entrepreneurial behavior through this method.
LanguageEnglish
Article number15761
JournalAcademy of Management Proceedings
Volume2014
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Conversation analysis
Ethnomethodology
Entrepreneurs
Entrepreneurship
Small firms
Conceptualization
Conception
Contextualization
Trajectory
Entrepreneurial behavior
Methodology
Entrepreneurial process

Keywords

  • conversation analysis
  • entrepreneurship
  • methodology

Cite this

@article{f659db84c1d849b99429ff6fe69da823,
title = "Missing the point? finding contextual detail in entrepreneurship and small firm scholarship",
abstract = "The trajectory of entrepreneurship scholarship can be characterized by a trend towards functionalist approaches. This has arguably led to findings that trade the contextualization of entrepreneurial processes for abstracted theoretical generalizations. We propose a methodological response that draws on ethnomethodology and conversation analysis to form the theoretical basis of a more nuanced empirical conception of the entrepreneur in situ. Our approach addresses current epistemological concerns in entrepreneurship scholarship by prioritizing the practical knowledge and reasoning skills of the entrepreneur. Additionally the proposed methodology provides a solution to an analytical problem confronting scholars who must select from myriad potentially relevant contexts to incorporate into analysis. We conclude our article by identifying some research opportunities that are enabled through adoption of an ethnomethodology/conversation analysis perspective. We hope that scholars may expand upon, complement and challenge current conceptualizations of entrepreneurial behavior through this method.",
keywords = "conversation analysis, entrepreneurship, methodology",
author = "Dominic Chalmers and Eleanor Shaw",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2014.56",
language = "English",
volume = "2014",
journal = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
issn = "0065-0668",
number = "1",

}

Missing the point? finding contextual detail in entrepreneurship and small firm scholarship. / Chalmers, Dominic; Shaw, Eleanor.

In: Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2014, No. 1, 15761, 01.01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missing the point? finding contextual detail in entrepreneurship and small firm scholarship

AU - Chalmers, Dominic

AU - Shaw, Eleanor

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The trajectory of entrepreneurship scholarship can be characterized by a trend towards functionalist approaches. This has arguably led to findings that trade the contextualization of entrepreneurial processes for abstracted theoretical generalizations. We propose a methodological response that draws on ethnomethodology and conversation analysis to form the theoretical basis of a more nuanced empirical conception of the entrepreneur in situ. Our approach addresses current epistemological concerns in entrepreneurship scholarship by prioritizing the practical knowledge and reasoning skills of the entrepreneur. Additionally the proposed methodology provides a solution to an analytical problem confronting scholars who must select from myriad potentially relevant contexts to incorporate into analysis. We conclude our article by identifying some research opportunities that are enabled through adoption of an ethnomethodology/conversation analysis perspective. We hope that scholars may expand upon, complement and challenge current conceptualizations of entrepreneurial behavior through this method.

AB - The trajectory of entrepreneurship scholarship can be characterized by a trend towards functionalist approaches. This has arguably led to findings that trade the contextualization of entrepreneurial processes for abstracted theoretical generalizations. We propose a methodological response that draws on ethnomethodology and conversation analysis to form the theoretical basis of a more nuanced empirical conception of the entrepreneur in situ. Our approach addresses current epistemological concerns in entrepreneurship scholarship by prioritizing the practical knowledge and reasoning skills of the entrepreneur. Additionally the proposed methodology provides a solution to an analytical problem confronting scholars who must select from myriad potentially relevant contexts to incorporate into analysis. We conclude our article by identifying some research opportunities that are enabled through adoption of an ethnomethodology/conversation analysis perspective. We hope that scholars may expand upon, complement and challenge current conceptualizations of entrepreneurial behavior through this method.

KW - conversation analysis

KW - entrepreneurship

KW - methodology

UR - http://proceedings.aom.org/content/2014/1/15761.abstract

U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2014.56

DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2014.56

M3 - Article

VL - 2014

JO - Academy of Management Proceedings

T2 - Academy of Management Proceedings

JF - Academy of Management Proceedings

SN - 0065-0668

IS - 1

M1 - 15761

ER -