Abstract
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 478-479 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Journal of Medical Ethics |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2004 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- medical ethics
- conception
- pregnancy
- human rights
- parenthood
- family law
Cite this
}
Misconceived conceptions : Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr and Mrs A and others. / Ford, Mary; Morgan, Derek.
In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 30, No. 5, 10.2004, p. 478-479.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
TY - JOUR
T1 - Misconceived conceptions
T2 - Journal of Medical Ethics
AU - Ford, Mary
AU - Morgan, Derek
PY - 2004/10
Y1 - 2004/10
N2 - The decision of Dame Butler-Sloss in the case of Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr & Mrs A & Others1 has already achieved notoriety. The disturbing facts have received widespread media coverage and fuelled further legal and political debate surrounding the “reproductive revolution”. 2 This short paper assesses the context and potential implications of the recent decision and, in particular, the nature and meaning of parenthood and the family.
AB - The decision of Dame Butler-Sloss in the case of Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr & Mrs A & Others1 has already achieved notoriety. The disturbing facts have received widespread media coverage and fuelled further legal and political debate surrounding the “reproductive revolution”. 2 This short paper assesses the context and potential implications of the recent decision and, in particular, the nature and meaning of parenthood and the family.
KW - medical ethics
KW - conception
KW - pregnancy
KW - human rights
KW - parenthood
KW - family law
U2 - 10.1136/jme.2003.004184
DO - 10.1136/jme.2003.004184
M3 - Comment/debate
VL - 30
SP - 478
EP - 479
JO - Journal of Medical Ethics
JF - Journal of Medical Ethics
SN - 0306-6800
IS - 5
ER -