Misconceived conceptions: Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr and Mrs A and others

Mary Ford; Derek Morgan

doi:10.1136/jme.2003.004184

Misconceived conceptions: Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr and Mrs A and others

Mary Ford, Derek Morgan

Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The decision of Dame Butler-Sloss in the case of Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr & Mrs A & Others1 has already achieved notoriety. The disturbing facts have received widespread media coverage and fuelled further legal and political debate surrounding the “reproductive revolution”. 2 This short paper assesses the context and potential implications of the recent decision and, in particular, the nature and meaning of parenthood and the family.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	478-479
Number of pages	2
Journal	Journal of Medical Ethics
Volume	30
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2003.004184
Publication status	Published - Oct 2004

Keywords

medical ethics
conception
pregnancy
human rights
parenthood
family law

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1136/jme.2003.004184

Cite this

@article{1dfc948b209141788ca3719f66cc3165,

title = "Misconceived conceptions: Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr and Mrs A and others",

abstract = "The decision of Dame Butler-Sloss in the case of Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr & Mrs A & Others1 has already achieved notoriety. The disturbing facts have received widespread media coverage and fuelled further legal and political debate surrounding the “reproductive revolution”. 2 This short paper assesses the context and potential implications of the recent decision and, in particular, the nature and meaning of parenthood and the family. ",

keywords = "medical ethics, conception, pregnancy, human rights, parenthood, family law",

author = "Mary Ford and Derek Morgan",

year = "2004",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1136/jme.2003.004184",

language = "English",

volume = "30",

pages = "478--479",

journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",

issn = "0306-6800",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Misconceived conceptions

T2 - Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr and Mrs A and others

AU - Ford, Mary

AU - Morgan, Derek

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - The decision of Dame Butler-Sloss in the case of Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr & Mrs A & Others1 has already achieved notoriety. The disturbing facts have received widespread media coverage and fuelled further legal and political debate surrounding the “reproductive revolution”. 2 This short paper assesses the context and potential implications of the recent decision and, in particular, the nature and meaning of parenthood and the family.

AB - The decision of Dame Butler-Sloss in the case of Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr & Mrs A & Others1 has already achieved notoriety. The disturbing facts have received widespread media coverage and fuelled further legal and political debate surrounding the “reproductive revolution”. 2 This short paper assesses the context and potential implications of the recent decision and, in particular, the nature and meaning of parenthood and the family.

KW - medical ethics

KW - conception

KW - pregnancy

KW - human rights

KW - parenthood

KW - family law

U2 - 10.1136/jme.2003.004184

DO - 10.1136/jme.2003.004184

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 30

SP - 478

EP - 479

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 5

ER -

Misconceived conceptions: Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v Mr and Mrs A and others

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this