Minimum income standards and household budgets

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Social Policy Review
Subtitle of host publication	Analysis and Debate in Social Policy
Place of Publication	Bristol
Pages	97-117
Number of pages	21
Volume	22
Publication status	Published - 10 Jul 2010

Keywords

• income standards
• household budgets
• poverty

Other files and links

• https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/social-policy-review-22

Cite this

• APA
• Author
• BIBTEX
• Harvard
• Standard
• RIS
• Vancouver

Deeming, C. (2010). Minimum income standards and household budgets. In Social Policy Review: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy (Vol. 22, pp. 97-117).

Deeming, Chris. / Minimum income standards and household budgets. Social Policy Review: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy. Vol. 22 Bristol, 2010. pp. 97-117

@inbook{c5b811e824e84c5d913975b6b2123a15,

title = "Minimum income standards and household budgets",

keywords = "income standards, household budgets, poverty",

author = "Chris Deeming",

year = "2010",

month = jul,

day = "10",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1847427113",

volume = "22",

pages = "97--117",

booktitle = "Social Policy Review",

}

Deeming, C 2010, Minimum income standards and household budgets. in Social Policy Review: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy. vol. 22, Bristol, pp. 97-117.

Minimum income standards and household budgets. / Deeming, Chris.

Social Policy Review: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy. Vol. 22 Bristol, 2010. p. 97-117.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Minimum income standards and household budgets

AU - Deeming, Chris

PY - 2010/7/10

Y1 - 2010/7/10

KW - income standards

KW - household budgets

KW - poverty

UR - https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/social-policy-review-22

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1847427113

VL - 22

SP - 97

EP - 117

BT - Social Policy Review

CY - Bristol

ER -

Deeming C. Minimum income standards and household budgets. In Social Policy Review: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy. Vol. 22. Bristol. 2010. p. 97-117