Minimally invasive total knee replacement: techniques and results

Frederic Picard, Angela Deakin, Navin Balasubramanian, Alberto Gregori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this review, we outlined the definition of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in total knee replacement (TKR) and described the different surgical approaches reported in the literature. Afterwards we went through the most recent studies assessing MIS TKR. Next, we searched for potential limitations of MIS knee replacement and tried to answer the following questions: Are there selective criteria and specific patient selection for MIS knee surgery? If there are, then what are they? After all, a discussion and conclusion completed this article. There is certainly room for MIS or at least less invasive surgery (LIS) for appropriate selected patients. Nonetheless, there are differences between approaches. Mini medial parapatellar is easy to master, quick to perform and potentially extendable, whereas mini subvastus and mini midvastus are trickier and require more caution related to risk of hematoma and VMO nerve damage. Current evidence on the safety and efficacy of mini-incision surgery for TKR does not appear fully adequate for the procedure to be used without special arrangements for consent and for audit or continuing research. There is an argument that a sudden jump from standard TKR to MIS TKR, especially without computer assistance such as navigation, patient specific instrumentation (PSI) or robotic, may breach a surgeon's duty of care toward patients because it exposes patients to unnecessary risks. As a final point, more evidence is required on the long-term safety and efficacy of this procedure which will give objective shed light on real benefits of MIS TKR.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
Early online date22 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 22 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Knee prostheses
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Surgery
Knee
Patient Navigation
Safety
Robotics
Hematoma
Patient Selection
Patient Care
Navigation
Research

Keywords

  • minimally invasive surgery
  • less invasive surgery
  • total knee replacement
  • total knee arthroplasty

Cite this

Picard, Frederic ; Deakin, Angela ; Balasubramanian, Navin ; Gregori, Alberto. / Minimally invasive total knee replacement : techniques and results. In: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology. 2018.
@article{c44a70150ad84ae787cc40bedbd9b994,
title = "Minimally invasive total knee replacement: techniques and results",
abstract = "In this review, we outlined the definition of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in total knee replacement (TKR) and described the different surgical approaches reported in the literature. Afterwards we went through the most recent studies assessing MIS TKR. Next, we searched for potential limitations of MIS knee replacement and tried to answer the following questions: Are there selective criteria and specific patient selection for MIS knee surgery? If there are, then what are they? After all, a discussion and conclusion completed this article. There is certainly room for MIS or at least less invasive surgery (LIS) for appropriate selected patients. Nonetheless, there are differences between approaches. Mini medial parapatellar is easy to master, quick to perform and potentially extendable, whereas mini subvastus and mini midvastus are trickier and require more caution related to risk of hematoma and VMO nerve damage. Current evidence on the safety and efficacy of mini-incision surgery for TKR does not appear fully adequate for the procedure to be used without special arrangements for consent and for audit or continuing research. There is an argument that a sudden jump from standard TKR to MIS TKR, especially without computer assistance such as navigation, patient specific instrumentation (PSI) or robotic, may breach a surgeon's duty of care toward patients because it exposes patients to unnecessary risks. As a final point, more evidence is required on the long-term safety and efficacy of this procedure which will give objective shed light on real benefits of MIS TKR.",
keywords = "minimally invasive surgery, less invasive surgery, total knee replacement, total knee arthroplasty",
author = "Frederic Picard and Angela Deakin and Navin Balasubramanian and Alberto Gregori",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1007/s00590-018-2164-4",
language = "English",
journal = "European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology",
issn = "1633-8065",

}

Minimally invasive total knee replacement : techniques and results. / Picard, Frederic; Deakin, Angela; Balasubramanian, Navin ; Gregori, Alberto.

In: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, 22.03.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive total knee replacement

T2 - European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology

AU - Picard, Frederic

AU - Deakin, Angela

AU - Balasubramanian, Navin

AU - Gregori, Alberto

PY - 2018/3/22

Y1 - 2018/3/22

N2 - In this review, we outlined the definition of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in total knee replacement (TKR) and described the different surgical approaches reported in the literature. Afterwards we went through the most recent studies assessing MIS TKR. Next, we searched for potential limitations of MIS knee replacement and tried to answer the following questions: Are there selective criteria and specific patient selection for MIS knee surgery? If there are, then what are they? After all, a discussion and conclusion completed this article. There is certainly room for MIS or at least less invasive surgery (LIS) for appropriate selected patients. Nonetheless, there are differences between approaches. Mini medial parapatellar is easy to master, quick to perform and potentially extendable, whereas mini subvastus and mini midvastus are trickier and require more caution related to risk of hematoma and VMO nerve damage. Current evidence on the safety and efficacy of mini-incision surgery for TKR does not appear fully adequate for the procedure to be used without special arrangements for consent and for audit or continuing research. There is an argument that a sudden jump from standard TKR to MIS TKR, especially without computer assistance such as navigation, patient specific instrumentation (PSI) or robotic, may breach a surgeon's duty of care toward patients because it exposes patients to unnecessary risks. As a final point, more evidence is required on the long-term safety and efficacy of this procedure which will give objective shed light on real benefits of MIS TKR.

AB - In this review, we outlined the definition of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in total knee replacement (TKR) and described the different surgical approaches reported in the literature. Afterwards we went through the most recent studies assessing MIS TKR. Next, we searched for potential limitations of MIS knee replacement and tried to answer the following questions: Are there selective criteria and specific patient selection for MIS knee surgery? If there are, then what are they? After all, a discussion and conclusion completed this article. There is certainly room for MIS or at least less invasive surgery (LIS) for appropriate selected patients. Nonetheless, there are differences between approaches. Mini medial parapatellar is easy to master, quick to perform and potentially extendable, whereas mini subvastus and mini midvastus are trickier and require more caution related to risk of hematoma and VMO nerve damage. Current evidence on the safety and efficacy of mini-incision surgery for TKR does not appear fully adequate for the procedure to be used without special arrangements for consent and for audit or continuing research. There is an argument that a sudden jump from standard TKR to MIS TKR, especially without computer assistance such as navigation, patient specific instrumentation (PSI) or robotic, may breach a surgeon's duty of care toward patients because it exposes patients to unnecessary risks. As a final point, more evidence is required on the long-term safety and efficacy of this procedure which will give objective shed light on real benefits of MIS TKR.

KW - minimally invasive surgery

KW - less invasive surgery

KW - total knee replacement

KW - total knee arthroplasty

UR - https://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/590

U2 - 10.1007/s00590-018-2164-4

DO - 10.1007/s00590-018-2164-4

M3 - Article

JO - European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology

JF - European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology

SN - 1633-8065

ER -