Methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines: philosophical positions, frames of reference, and spheres of inquiry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to contribute an inclusive insight into methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines and to unravel aspects that include philosophical positions, frames of reference, and spheres of inquiry.

Design/methodology/approach: Following ontological and epistemological interpretations, the methodology adopted involves conceptual and critical analysis which is based on reviewing and categorising classical literature and more than hundred contributions in architectural and design research developed over the past five decades which were classified under perspectives of inquiry and frames of reference.

Findings: Postulated through three philosophical positions—positivism, anti-positivism, and emancipationist—six frames of reference were identified: systematic, computational, managerial, psychological, person-environment type-a and person-environment type-b. Technically oriented research (TOR) and conceptually driven research (CDR) were categorised as perspectives of inquiry and were scrutinised together with their developmental aspects. By mapping the philosophical positions to the frames of reference, various characteristics and spheres of inquiry within each frame of reference were revealed.

Research limitations/implications: Further detailed examples can be developed to offer discerning elucidations relevant to each frame of reference.

Practical implications (if applicable): The study is viewed as an enabling mechanism for researchers to identify the unique particularities of their research and the way in which it is pursued.

Social implications (if applicable): Not Applicable

Originality/value: The study is a response to a glaring dearth of cognizance and a reaction to a growing but confusing body of knowledge that does not offer a clear picture of what research in architecture is. By identifying key characteristics, philosophical positions, and frames of reference that pertain to research in architecture and associated disciplines, the findings represent a scholastic endeavour in its field.
LanguageEnglish
JournalArchnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 15 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

development of methods
positivism
human being
methodology
research planning
interpretation
knowledge
Values

Keywords

  • architecture
  • design
  • built environment
  • methodological research
  • technically oriented research
  • conceptually driven research

Cite this

@article{693d770dffdf4ece8248f26ce401c92b,
title = "Methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines: philosophical positions, frames of reference, and spheres of inquiry",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to contribute an inclusive insight into methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines and to unravel aspects that include philosophical positions, frames of reference, and spheres of inquiry. Design/methodology/approach: Following ontological and epistemological interpretations, the methodology adopted involves conceptual and critical analysis which is based on reviewing and categorising classical literature and more than hundred contributions in architectural and design research developed over the past five decades which were classified under perspectives of inquiry and frames of reference. Findings: Postulated through three philosophical positions—positivism, anti-positivism, and emancipationist—six frames of reference were identified: systematic, computational, managerial, psychological, person-environment type-a and person-environment type-b. Technically oriented research (TOR) and conceptually driven research (CDR) were categorised as perspectives of inquiry and were scrutinised together with their developmental aspects. By mapping the philosophical positions to the frames of reference, various characteristics and spheres of inquiry within each frame of reference were revealed. Research limitations/implications: Further detailed examples can be developed to offer discerning elucidations relevant to each frame of reference.Practical implications (if applicable): The study is viewed as an enabling mechanism for researchers to identify the unique particularities of their research and the way in which it is pursued.Social implications (if applicable): Not ApplicableOriginality/value: The study is a response to a glaring dearth of cognizance and a reaction to a growing but confusing body of knowledge that does not offer a clear picture of what research in architecture is. By identifying key characteristics, philosophical positions, and frames of reference that pertain to research in architecture and associated disciplines, the findings represent a scholastic endeavour in its field.",
keywords = "architecture, design, built environment, methodological research, technically oriented research, conceptually driven research",
author = "Salama, {Ashraf M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1108/ARCH-01-2019-0012",
language = "English",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines

T2 - philosophical positions, frames of reference, and spheres of inquiry

AU - Salama, Ashraf M.

PY - 2019/1/15

Y1 - 2019/1/15

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to contribute an inclusive insight into methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines and to unravel aspects that include philosophical positions, frames of reference, and spheres of inquiry. Design/methodology/approach: Following ontological and epistemological interpretations, the methodology adopted involves conceptual and critical analysis which is based on reviewing and categorising classical literature and more than hundred contributions in architectural and design research developed over the past five decades which were classified under perspectives of inquiry and frames of reference. Findings: Postulated through three philosophical positions—positivism, anti-positivism, and emancipationist—six frames of reference were identified: systematic, computational, managerial, psychological, person-environment type-a and person-environment type-b. Technically oriented research (TOR) and conceptually driven research (CDR) were categorised as perspectives of inquiry and were scrutinised together with their developmental aspects. By mapping the philosophical positions to the frames of reference, various characteristics and spheres of inquiry within each frame of reference were revealed. Research limitations/implications: Further detailed examples can be developed to offer discerning elucidations relevant to each frame of reference.Practical implications (if applicable): The study is viewed as an enabling mechanism for researchers to identify the unique particularities of their research and the way in which it is pursued.Social implications (if applicable): Not ApplicableOriginality/value: The study is a response to a glaring dearth of cognizance and a reaction to a growing but confusing body of knowledge that does not offer a clear picture of what research in architecture is. By identifying key characteristics, philosophical positions, and frames of reference that pertain to research in architecture and associated disciplines, the findings represent a scholastic endeavour in its field.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to contribute an inclusive insight into methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines and to unravel aspects that include philosophical positions, frames of reference, and spheres of inquiry. Design/methodology/approach: Following ontological and epistemological interpretations, the methodology adopted involves conceptual and critical analysis which is based on reviewing and categorising classical literature and more than hundred contributions in architectural and design research developed over the past five decades which were classified under perspectives of inquiry and frames of reference. Findings: Postulated through three philosophical positions—positivism, anti-positivism, and emancipationist—six frames of reference were identified: systematic, computational, managerial, psychological, person-environment type-a and person-environment type-b. Technically oriented research (TOR) and conceptually driven research (CDR) were categorised as perspectives of inquiry and were scrutinised together with their developmental aspects. By mapping the philosophical positions to the frames of reference, various characteristics and spheres of inquiry within each frame of reference were revealed. Research limitations/implications: Further detailed examples can be developed to offer discerning elucidations relevant to each frame of reference.Practical implications (if applicable): The study is viewed as an enabling mechanism for researchers to identify the unique particularities of their research and the way in which it is pursued.Social implications (if applicable): Not ApplicableOriginality/value: The study is a response to a glaring dearth of cognizance and a reaction to a growing but confusing body of knowledge that does not offer a clear picture of what research in architecture is. By identifying key characteristics, philosophical positions, and frames of reference that pertain to research in architecture and associated disciplines, the findings represent a scholastic endeavour in its field.

KW - architecture

KW - design

KW - built environment

KW - methodological research

KW - technically oriented research

KW - conceptually driven research

UR - http://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/products/journals/journals.htm?id=ARCH

U2 - 10.1108/ARCH-01-2019-0012

DO - 10.1108/ARCH-01-2019-0012

M3 - Article

ER -