Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals

R. John Robertson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata 'compromises' they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages295-300
    Number of pages5
    JournalLibrary Review
    Volume54
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005

    Fingerprint

    information science
    compromise
    community
    librarian

    Keywords

    • information science
    • librarians
    • professions
    • metadata
    • libraries
    • methodology

    Cite this

    Robertson, R. John. / Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals. In: Library Review. 2005 ; Vol. 54, No. 4. pp. 295-300.
    @article{3b2942b24fc741c3abdb297ce989c696,
    title = "Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals",
    abstract = "Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata 'compromises' they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings.",
    keywords = "information science, librarians, professions, metadata, libraries, methodology",
    author = "Robertson, {R. John}",
    year = "2005",
    doi = "10.1108/00242530510600543",
    language = "English",
    volume = "54",
    pages = "295--300",
    journal = "Library Review",
    issn = "0024-2535",
    publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
    number = "4",

    }

    Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals. / Robertson, R. John.

    In: Library Review, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2005, p. 295-300.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals

    AU - Robertson, R. John

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata 'compromises' they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings.

    AB - Purpose - In contrast with recent studies noting the necessity of library and information science (LIS) skills in digital library and repository projects, this study aims to examine the impact of metadata quality requirements on how LIS professionals apply their skills outside a library setting. Design/methodology/approach - The paper reviews the concept of metadata quality and examines the implications of this for LIS professionals by reviewing the differences between the context of the library community and other relevant communities of practice. Findings - The paper argues that, although much needed, LIS skills require contextualisation before application outside library settings. Research limitations/implications - Many of the new opportunities for and settings of LIS skills are immature - consequently this analysis may date as the context of these settings mature. Current trends, however, suggest that it will not. Practical implications - Training in LIS skills should take account of how they might apply differently outside libraries. Librarians co-operating with colleagues outside the library should appreciate the potential metadata 'compromises' they might have to make and why they are necessary. Originality/value - The paper provides food for thought on the increasing number of LIS professionals working outside library settings.

    KW - information science

    KW - librarians

    KW - professions

    KW - metadata

    KW - libraries

    KW - methodology

    UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530510600543

    U2 - 10.1108/00242530510600543

    DO - 10.1108/00242530510600543

    M3 - Article

    VL - 54

    SP - 295

    EP - 300

    JO - Library Review

    T2 - Library Review

    JF - Library Review

    SN - 0024-2535

    IS - 4

    ER -