Medication safety problems priorities in community pharmacy in Saudi Arabia

a multi-stakeholder Delphi study using the human factors framework

Lobna Abdullah Al Juffali, Peter Knapp, Sinaa Al-Aqeel, Margaret C Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim To achieve multi-stakeholder consensus and prioritisation of medication safety problems in community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia. Design and intervention A theoretically-underpinned, three-round Delphi study. Setting Saudi Arabia. Participants Patients and public (pharmacy users), pharmacy-related professionals (policymakers, academics, medication safety officers and pharmacy owners) and community pharmacists. Methods Round 1 comprised 84 statements derived from a qualitative study. The items were grouped according to the Human Factors Framework (HFF). Rounds 1 and 2 aimed to achieve consensus, 6-point Likert response scale (agreement/disagreement) was used. Round 3 aimed to prioritise the items for which consensus was achieved in Rounds 1 and 2 indicated on a 5-point scale (very important to unimportant). Consensus was predefined as any item that achieved ≥70%. Results The number of respondents in Rounds 1, 2 and 3 was 161, 120 and 112, respectively. In all three rounds, the majority of respondents were pharmacy users (Round 1 77% (n=124), Round 2 74% (n=89), Round 3 72% (n=81)). Consensus was achieved with 28/84 items. The top five medication safety priorities were: lack of pharmacy facilities such as counselling area, lack of communication between pharmacists and physicians, lack of patient databases, lack of post-registration pharmacist education and pharmacists' long working hours. The professional and pharmacy user groups achieved consensus on similar items through different categories of the HFFs. Community pharmacists had the highest percentage of consensus among the three groups for factors related to work, such as high workload and low salaries. Conclusion This multi-stakeholder study used the HFF to identify and prioritise the main medication safety challenges facing community pharmacy in Saudi Arabia. It indicates the need for changes to practice and policy and further research to address these priorities and promote medication safety at an individual, pharmacy and population level.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere032419
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Delphi Technique
Saudi Arabia
Pharmacies
Consensus
Pharmacists
Safety
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Workload
Counseling
Communication
Databases
Physicians
Education
Research

Keywords

  • community pharmacy services
  • Delphi technique
  • drug related side effects and adverse reactions
  • ergonomics
  • medication errors
  • patient safety

Cite this

@article{ca274571c9fc460786df27c4d9f5eece,
title = "Medication safety problems priorities in community pharmacy in Saudi Arabia: a multi-stakeholder Delphi study using the human factors framework",
abstract = "Aim To achieve multi-stakeholder consensus and prioritisation of medication safety problems in community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia. Design and intervention A theoretically-underpinned, three-round Delphi study. Setting Saudi Arabia. Participants Patients and public (pharmacy users), pharmacy-related professionals (policymakers, academics, medication safety officers and pharmacy owners) and community pharmacists. Methods Round 1 comprised 84 statements derived from a qualitative study. The items were grouped according to the Human Factors Framework (HFF). Rounds 1 and 2 aimed to achieve consensus, 6-point Likert response scale (agreement/disagreement) was used. Round 3 aimed to prioritise the items for which consensus was achieved in Rounds 1 and 2 indicated on a 5-point scale (very important to unimportant). Consensus was predefined as any item that achieved ≥70{\%}. Results The number of respondents in Rounds 1, 2 and 3 was 161, 120 and 112, respectively. In all three rounds, the majority of respondents were pharmacy users (Round 1 77{\%} (n=124), Round 2 74{\%} (n=89), Round 3 72{\%} (n=81)). Consensus was achieved with 28/84 items. The top five medication safety priorities were: lack of pharmacy facilities such as counselling area, lack of communication between pharmacists and physicians, lack of patient databases, lack of post-registration pharmacist education and pharmacists' long working hours. The professional and pharmacy user groups achieved consensus on similar items through different categories of the HFFs. Community pharmacists had the highest percentage of consensus among the three groups for factors related to work, such as high workload and low salaries. Conclusion This multi-stakeholder study used the HFF to identify and prioritise the main medication safety challenges facing community pharmacy in Saudi Arabia. It indicates the need for changes to practice and policy and further research to address these priorities and promote medication safety at an individual, pharmacy and population level.",
keywords = "community pharmacy services, Delphi technique, drug related side effects and adverse reactions, ergonomics, medication errors, patient safety",
author = "{Al Juffali}, {Lobna Abdullah} and Peter Knapp and Sinaa Al-Aqeel and Watson, {Margaret C}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032419",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",

}

Medication safety problems priorities in community pharmacy in Saudi Arabia : a multi-stakeholder Delphi study using the human factors framework. / Al Juffali, Lobna Abdullah; Knapp, Peter; Al-Aqeel, Sinaa; Watson, Margaret C.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 9, e032419, 05.11.2019, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Medication safety problems priorities in community pharmacy in Saudi Arabia

T2 - a multi-stakeholder Delphi study using the human factors framework

AU - Al Juffali, Lobna Abdullah

AU - Knapp, Peter

AU - Al-Aqeel, Sinaa

AU - Watson, Margaret C

PY - 2019/11/5

Y1 - 2019/11/5

N2 - Aim To achieve multi-stakeholder consensus and prioritisation of medication safety problems in community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia. Design and intervention A theoretically-underpinned, three-round Delphi study. Setting Saudi Arabia. Participants Patients and public (pharmacy users), pharmacy-related professionals (policymakers, academics, medication safety officers and pharmacy owners) and community pharmacists. Methods Round 1 comprised 84 statements derived from a qualitative study. The items were grouped according to the Human Factors Framework (HFF). Rounds 1 and 2 aimed to achieve consensus, 6-point Likert response scale (agreement/disagreement) was used. Round 3 aimed to prioritise the items for which consensus was achieved in Rounds 1 and 2 indicated on a 5-point scale (very important to unimportant). Consensus was predefined as any item that achieved ≥70%. Results The number of respondents in Rounds 1, 2 and 3 was 161, 120 and 112, respectively. In all three rounds, the majority of respondents were pharmacy users (Round 1 77% (n=124), Round 2 74% (n=89), Round 3 72% (n=81)). Consensus was achieved with 28/84 items. The top five medication safety priorities were: lack of pharmacy facilities such as counselling area, lack of communication between pharmacists and physicians, lack of patient databases, lack of post-registration pharmacist education and pharmacists' long working hours. The professional and pharmacy user groups achieved consensus on similar items through different categories of the HFFs. Community pharmacists had the highest percentage of consensus among the three groups for factors related to work, such as high workload and low salaries. Conclusion This multi-stakeholder study used the HFF to identify and prioritise the main medication safety challenges facing community pharmacy in Saudi Arabia. It indicates the need for changes to practice and policy and further research to address these priorities and promote medication safety at an individual, pharmacy and population level.

AB - Aim To achieve multi-stakeholder consensus and prioritisation of medication safety problems in community pharmacies in Saudi Arabia. Design and intervention A theoretically-underpinned, three-round Delphi study. Setting Saudi Arabia. Participants Patients and public (pharmacy users), pharmacy-related professionals (policymakers, academics, medication safety officers and pharmacy owners) and community pharmacists. Methods Round 1 comprised 84 statements derived from a qualitative study. The items were grouped according to the Human Factors Framework (HFF). Rounds 1 and 2 aimed to achieve consensus, 6-point Likert response scale (agreement/disagreement) was used. Round 3 aimed to prioritise the items for which consensus was achieved in Rounds 1 and 2 indicated on a 5-point scale (very important to unimportant). Consensus was predefined as any item that achieved ≥70%. Results The number of respondents in Rounds 1, 2 and 3 was 161, 120 and 112, respectively. In all three rounds, the majority of respondents were pharmacy users (Round 1 77% (n=124), Round 2 74% (n=89), Round 3 72% (n=81)). Consensus was achieved with 28/84 items. The top five medication safety priorities were: lack of pharmacy facilities such as counselling area, lack of communication between pharmacists and physicians, lack of patient databases, lack of post-registration pharmacist education and pharmacists' long working hours. The professional and pharmacy user groups achieved consensus on similar items through different categories of the HFFs. Community pharmacists had the highest percentage of consensus among the three groups for factors related to work, such as high workload and low salaries. Conclusion This multi-stakeholder study used the HFF to identify and prioritise the main medication safety challenges facing community pharmacy in Saudi Arabia. It indicates the need for changes to practice and policy and further research to address these priorities and promote medication safety at an individual, pharmacy and population level.

KW - community pharmacy services

KW - Delphi technique

KW - drug related side effects and adverse reactions

KW - ergonomics

KW - medication errors

KW - patient safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074622683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032419

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032419

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

M1 - e032419

ER -