Measuring the mnemonic advantage of counter intuitive and counter schematic concepts

Claire V.M. Johnson, S.W. Kelly, Paul Bishop

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The debate on the value of Boyer's (1994) minimally counter-intuitive (MCI) theory continues to generate considerable theoretical and empirical attention. Although the theory offers an explanation as to why certain cultural texts and narratives are particularly well conveyed and transmitted, amidst society and over time, conflicting evidence remains for any mnemonic advantage of minimally counter-intuitive concepts. In an effort to reconcile these conflicting results, Barrett (2008) has made a comprehensive attempt in presenting a formal system for quantifying counter - intuitiveness including a distinction between counter-intuitive and counter-schematic concepts. The present article uses this system to generate sentences containing different levels of counter-intuitiveness, and tests whether minimally counter-intuitive items show a mnemonic advantage over concepts which are more counter-intuitive or counter schematic. Results indicate that MCI concepts hold a mnemonic advantage over counterschematic and maximally counter-intuitive concepts but only for one-week delayed recall. Interference effects may have masked immediate recall effects. Yes-no recognition after one week delay showed almost 100% accuracy suggesting that availability of retrieval cues is the factor which determines the mnemonic advantage of MCI concepts.
LanguageEnglish
Pages109-121
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Cognition and Culture
Volume10
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Cues
Mnemonics
interference
narrative
evidence
Values
Recognition (Psychology)
time
Society
Interference
Intuitive Theories

Keywords

  • recall
  • recognition
  • long term memory
  • counter intuitiveness
  • religion

Cite this

@article{01dcafc45cae4a60b4845b7c0dec02d5,
title = "Measuring the mnemonic advantage of counter intuitive and counter schematic concepts",
abstract = "The debate on the value of Boyer's (1994) minimally counter-intuitive (MCI) theory continues to generate considerable theoretical and empirical attention. Although the theory offers an explanation as to why certain cultural texts and narratives are particularly well conveyed and transmitted, amidst society and over time, conflicting evidence remains for any mnemonic advantage of minimally counter-intuitive concepts. In an effort to reconcile these conflicting results, Barrett (2008) has made a comprehensive attempt in presenting a formal system for quantifying counter - intuitiveness including a distinction between counter-intuitive and counter-schematic concepts. The present article uses this system to generate sentences containing different levels of counter-intuitiveness, and tests whether minimally counter-intuitive items show a mnemonic advantage over concepts which are more counter-intuitive or counter schematic. Results indicate that MCI concepts hold a mnemonic advantage over counterschematic and maximally counter-intuitive concepts but only for one-week delayed recall. Interference effects may have masked immediate recall effects. Yes-no recognition after one week delay showed almost 100{\%} accuracy suggesting that availability of retrieval cues is the factor which determines the mnemonic advantage of MCI concepts.",
keywords = "recall, recognition, long term memory, counter intuitiveness, religion",
author = "Johnson, {Claire V.M.} and S.W. Kelly and Paul Bishop",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1163/156853710X497194",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "109--121",
journal = "Journal of Cognition and Culture",
issn = "1567-7095",
number = "1-2",

}

Measuring the mnemonic advantage of counter intuitive and counter schematic concepts. / Johnson, Claire V.M.; Kelly, S.W.; Bishop, Paul.

In: Journal of Cognition and Culture, Vol. 10, No. 1-2, 2010, p. 109-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the mnemonic advantage of counter intuitive and counter schematic concepts

AU - Johnson, Claire V.M.

AU - Kelly, S.W.

AU - Bishop, Paul

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The debate on the value of Boyer's (1994) minimally counter-intuitive (MCI) theory continues to generate considerable theoretical and empirical attention. Although the theory offers an explanation as to why certain cultural texts and narratives are particularly well conveyed and transmitted, amidst society and over time, conflicting evidence remains for any mnemonic advantage of minimally counter-intuitive concepts. In an effort to reconcile these conflicting results, Barrett (2008) has made a comprehensive attempt in presenting a formal system for quantifying counter - intuitiveness including a distinction between counter-intuitive and counter-schematic concepts. The present article uses this system to generate sentences containing different levels of counter-intuitiveness, and tests whether minimally counter-intuitive items show a mnemonic advantage over concepts which are more counter-intuitive or counter schematic. Results indicate that MCI concepts hold a mnemonic advantage over counterschematic and maximally counter-intuitive concepts but only for one-week delayed recall. Interference effects may have masked immediate recall effects. Yes-no recognition after one week delay showed almost 100% accuracy suggesting that availability of retrieval cues is the factor which determines the mnemonic advantage of MCI concepts.

AB - The debate on the value of Boyer's (1994) minimally counter-intuitive (MCI) theory continues to generate considerable theoretical and empirical attention. Although the theory offers an explanation as to why certain cultural texts and narratives are particularly well conveyed and transmitted, amidst society and over time, conflicting evidence remains for any mnemonic advantage of minimally counter-intuitive concepts. In an effort to reconcile these conflicting results, Barrett (2008) has made a comprehensive attempt in presenting a formal system for quantifying counter - intuitiveness including a distinction between counter-intuitive and counter-schematic concepts. The present article uses this system to generate sentences containing different levels of counter-intuitiveness, and tests whether minimally counter-intuitive items show a mnemonic advantage over concepts which are more counter-intuitive or counter schematic. Results indicate that MCI concepts hold a mnemonic advantage over counterschematic and maximally counter-intuitive concepts but only for one-week delayed recall. Interference effects may have masked immediate recall effects. Yes-no recognition after one week delay showed almost 100% accuracy suggesting that availability of retrieval cues is the factor which determines the mnemonic advantage of MCI concepts.

KW - recall

KW - recognition

KW - long term memory

KW - counter intuitiveness

KW - religion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049424940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/156853710X497194

DO - 10.1163/156853710X497194

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 109

EP - 121

JO - Journal of Cognition and Culture

T2 - Journal of Cognition and Culture

JF - Journal of Cognition and Culture

SN - 1567-7095

IS - 1-2

ER -