Measuring the energy innovation process: an indicator framework and a case study of wind energy in China

Rui Hu, Jim Skea, Matthew J. Hannon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whilst a well-established literature on metrics to assess innovation performance exists, relatively little work has linked it to the energy technology innovation process. This paper systematically brings together indicator sets and derives an indicator framework for measuring energy innovation, offering an important step forward in the quantitative evaluation of energy innovation performance. It incorporates input, output and outcome metrics that relate to different stages along the energy technology innovation chain, namely research, development, demonstration, market formation and diffusion. To test its efficacy, the indicator framework is applied to the case of wind energy in China, drawing comparisons against global market leaders such as Denmark, Germany and the USA. The paper finds that the framework enables a more rigorous comparative analysis of energy innovation between countries than currently offered by either the application of piecemeal indicators and complements contextually rich qualitative case studies. The empirical analysis shows that China has begun to lead across a range of innovation inputs (e.g. R&D expenditure) and outputs (e.g. publications) but lags considerably behind international competitors against other output and outcome indicators such as patents, revenue and exports.
LanguageEnglish
Pages227-244
Number of pages18
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume127
Early online date24 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Wind power
China
Innovation
Technology
Patents
Denmark
Health Expenditures
Germany
Publications
Research
Wind energy
Energy
Innovation process
Demonstrations
Innovation performance
Technology innovation
Energy technology

Keywords

  • innovation metrics
  • energy technology innovation
  • China

Cite this

@article{6441fd415c7a434183ddaa6dfa3895e8,
title = "Measuring the energy innovation process: an indicator framework and a case study of wind energy in China",
abstract = "Whilst a well-established literature on metrics to assess innovation performance exists, relatively little work has linked it to the energy technology innovation process. This paper systematically brings together indicator sets and derives an indicator framework for measuring energy innovation, offering an important step forward in the quantitative evaluation of energy innovation performance. It incorporates input, output and outcome metrics that relate to different stages along the energy technology innovation chain, namely research, development, demonstration, market formation and diffusion. To test its efficacy, the indicator framework is applied to the case of wind energy in China, drawing comparisons against global market leaders such as Denmark, Germany and the USA. The paper finds that the framework enables a more rigorous comparative analysis of energy innovation between countries than currently offered by either the application of piecemeal indicators and complements contextually rich qualitative case studies. The empirical analysis shows that China has begun to lead across a range of innovation inputs (e.g. R&D expenditure) and outputs (e.g. publications) but lags considerably behind international competitors against other output and outcome indicators such as patents, revenue and exports.",
keywords = "innovation metrics, energy technology innovation, China",
author = "Rui Hu and Jim Skea and Hannon, {Matthew J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.025",
language = "English",
volume = "127",
pages = "227--244",
journal = "Technological Forecasting and Social Change",
issn = "0040-1625",

}

Measuring the energy innovation process : an indicator framework and a case study of wind energy in China. / Hu, Rui; Skea, Jim; Hannon, Matthew J.

In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 127, 01.02.2018, p. 227-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the energy innovation process

T2 - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

AU - Hu, Rui

AU - Skea, Jim

AU - Hannon, Matthew J.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Whilst a well-established literature on metrics to assess innovation performance exists, relatively little work has linked it to the energy technology innovation process. This paper systematically brings together indicator sets and derives an indicator framework for measuring energy innovation, offering an important step forward in the quantitative evaluation of energy innovation performance. It incorporates input, output and outcome metrics that relate to different stages along the energy technology innovation chain, namely research, development, demonstration, market formation and diffusion. To test its efficacy, the indicator framework is applied to the case of wind energy in China, drawing comparisons against global market leaders such as Denmark, Germany and the USA. The paper finds that the framework enables a more rigorous comparative analysis of energy innovation between countries than currently offered by either the application of piecemeal indicators and complements contextually rich qualitative case studies. The empirical analysis shows that China has begun to lead across a range of innovation inputs (e.g. R&D expenditure) and outputs (e.g. publications) but lags considerably behind international competitors against other output and outcome indicators such as patents, revenue and exports.

AB - Whilst a well-established literature on metrics to assess innovation performance exists, relatively little work has linked it to the energy technology innovation process. This paper systematically brings together indicator sets and derives an indicator framework for measuring energy innovation, offering an important step forward in the quantitative evaluation of energy innovation performance. It incorporates input, output and outcome metrics that relate to different stages along the energy technology innovation chain, namely research, development, demonstration, market formation and diffusion. To test its efficacy, the indicator framework is applied to the case of wind energy in China, drawing comparisons against global market leaders such as Denmark, Germany and the USA. The paper finds that the framework enables a more rigorous comparative analysis of energy innovation between countries than currently offered by either the application of piecemeal indicators and complements contextually rich qualitative case studies. The empirical analysis shows that China has begun to lead across a range of innovation inputs (e.g. R&D expenditure) and outputs (e.g. publications) but lags considerably behind international competitors against other output and outcome indicators such as patents, revenue and exports.

KW - innovation metrics

KW - energy technology innovation

KW - China

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/technological-forecasting-and-social-change

U2 - 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.025

DO - 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.025

M3 - Article

VL - 127

SP - 227

EP - 244

JO - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

JF - Technological Forecasting and Social Change

SN - 0040-1625

ER -