Measuring open innovation in SMEs

Dylan Jones Evans, Aineias Gkikas, Martin Rhisiart, Niall G. MacKenzie

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Research on open innovation in firms has grown significantly over the last decade. While scholars have started to address the knowledge gaps around open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), there is still much to be done to develop more systematic evidence on the open innovation practices of SMEs. Given this, and in order to develop a greater understanding of open innovation practices at the SME level, this chapter develops a methodology for capturing, measuring, and benchmarking open innovation practices of SMEs. The theoretical framework proposes and develops six composite indicators to measure the different elements of open innovation within SMEs. These six pillars of open innovation practices are knowledge and technology sourcing activities; innovation expenditure; sources of knowledge; human capital; innovation networks; and intellectual property protection. They allow the examination of this phenomenon across spatial, temporal, and firm-level dimensions. The theoretical framework proposed herein has the potential to provide useful insights on the open innovation activity of SMEs across different size, sectoral, and spatial measures. This has value for policymakers, practitioners, and academic scholars seeking to better understand the differences in open innovation activity at these levels. This can be achieved by utilizing data from Community Innovation Surveys as the main data source for measuring innovation in Europe. The harmonized nature of these surveys provides a unique opportunity for benchmarking and comparative analysis on open innovation activities of different sectors and regions utilizing the proposed framework of open innovation practices. A further impact of the methodology that we propose in this chapter is its potential integration with the annual European Innovation Scoreboard and Regional Innovation Scoreboards. Currently, such an approach is lacking from both these EU-level scoreboards.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearching Open Innovation in SMEs
Editorswim Vanhaverbeake, Federico Frattini, Nadine Roijakkers, Mohammed Usman
Place of PublicationNew Jersey
Chapter13
Pages399-427
Number of pages29
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Small and medium-sized enterprises
Open innovation
Innovation
Innovation activities
Benchmarking
Theoretical framework
Methodology
Composite indicators
Knowledge sourcing
Innovation networks
Expenditure
Intellectual property
Comparative analysis
Community Innovation Survey
Technology sourcing
Knowledge gap
Data sources
Human capital
Regional innovation
Politicians

Keywords

  • open innovation
  • small and medium sized companies
  • community innovation

Cite this

Jones Evans, D., Gkikas, A., Rhisiart, M., & MacKenzie, N. G. (2018). Measuring open innovation in SMEs. In W. Vanhaverbeake, F. Frattini, N. Roijakkers, & M. Usman (Eds.), Researching Open Innovation in SMEs (pp. 399-427). New Jersey. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813230972_0013
Jones Evans, Dylan ; Gkikas, Aineias ; Rhisiart, Martin ; MacKenzie, Niall G. / Measuring open innovation in SMEs. Researching Open Innovation in SMEs. editor / wim Vanhaverbeake ; Federico Frattini ; Nadine Roijakkers ; Mohammed Usman. New Jersey, 2018. pp. 399-427
@inbook{4f1d77f1aaba4665b0f7440307186960,
title = "Measuring open innovation in SMEs",
abstract = "Research on open innovation in firms has grown significantly over the last decade. While scholars have started to address the knowledge gaps around open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), there is still much to be done to develop more systematic evidence on the open innovation practices of SMEs. Given this, and in order to develop a greater understanding of open innovation practices at the SME level, this chapter develops a methodology for capturing, measuring, and benchmarking open innovation practices of SMEs. The theoretical framework proposes and develops six composite indicators to measure the different elements of open innovation within SMEs. These six pillars of open innovation practices are knowledge and technology sourcing activities; innovation expenditure; sources of knowledge; human capital; innovation networks; and intellectual property protection. They allow the examination of this phenomenon across spatial, temporal, and firm-level dimensions. The theoretical framework proposed herein has the potential to provide useful insights on the open innovation activity of SMEs across different size, sectoral, and spatial measures. This has value for policymakers, practitioners, and academic scholars seeking to better understand the differences in open innovation activity at these levels. This can be achieved by utilizing data from Community Innovation Surveys as the main data source for measuring innovation in Europe. The harmonized nature of these surveys provides a unique opportunity for benchmarking and comparative analysis on open innovation activities of different sectors and regions utilizing the proposed framework of open innovation practices. A further impact of the methodology that we propose in this chapter is its potential integration with the annual European Innovation Scoreboard and Regional Innovation Scoreboards. Currently, such an approach is lacking from both these EU-level scoreboards.",
keywords = "open innovation, small and medium sized companies, community innovation",
author = "{Jones Evans}, Dylan and Aineias Gkikas and Martin Rhisiart and MacKenzie, {Niall G.}",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1142/9789813230972_0013",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-981-3230-96-5",
pages = "399--427",
editor = "wim Vanhaverbeake and Federico Frattini and Nadine Roijakkers and Mohammed Usman",
booktitle = "Researching Open Innovation in SMEs",

}

Jones Evans, D, Gkikas, A, Rhisiart, M & MacKenzie, NG 2018, Measuring open innovation in SMEs. in W Vanhaverbeake, F Frattini, N Roijakkers & M Usman (eds), Researching Open Innovation in SMEs. New Jersey, pp. 399-427. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813230972_0013

Measuring open innovation in SMEs. / Jones Evans, Dylan; Gkikas, Aineias; Rhisiart, Martin; MacKenzie, Niall G.

Researching Open Innovation in SMEs. ed. / wim Vanhaverbeake; Federico Frattini; Nadine Roijakkers; Mohammed Usman. New Jersey, 2018. p. 399-427.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Measuring open innovation in SMEs

AU - Jones Evans, Dylan

AU - Gkikas, Aineias

AU - Rhisiart, Martin

AU - MacKenzie, Niall G.

PY - 2018/4/30

Y1 - 2018/4/30

N2 - Research on open innovation in firms has grown significantly over the last decade. While scholars have started to address the knowledge gaps around open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), there is still much to be done to develop more systematic evidence on the open innovation practices of SMEs. Given this, and in order to develop a greater understanding of open innovation practices at the SME level, this chapter develops a methodology for capturing, measuring, and benchmarking open innovation practices of SMEs. The theoretical framework proposes and develops six composite indicators to measure the different elements of open innovation within SMEs. These six pillars of open innovation practices are knowledge and technology sourcing activities; innovation expenditure; sources of knowledge; human capital; innovation networks; and intellectual property protection. They allow the examination of this phenomenon across spatial, temporal, and firm-level dimensions. The theoretical framework proposed herein has the potential to provide useful insights on the open innovation activity of SMEs across different size, sectoral, and spatial measures. This has value for policymakers, practitioners, and academic scholars seeking to better understand the differences in open innovation activity at these levels. This can be achieved by utilizing data from Community Innovation Surveys as the main data source for measuring innovation in Europe. The harmonized nature of these surveys provides a unique opportunity for benchmarking and comparative analysis on open innovation activities of different sectors and regions utilizing the proposed framework of open innovation practices. A further impact of the methodology that we propose in this chapter is its potential integration with the annual European Innovation Scoreboard and Regional Innovation Scoreboards. Currently, such an approach is lacking from both these EU-level scoreboards.

AB - Research on open innovation in firms has grown significantly over the last decade. While scholars have started to address the knowledge gaps around open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), there is still much to be done to develop more systematic evidence on the open innovation practices of SMEs. Given this, and in order to develop a greater understanding of open innovation practices at the SME level, this chapter develops a methodology for capturing, measuring, and benchmarking open innovation practices of SMEs. The theoretical framework proposes and develops six composite indicators to measure the different elements of open innovation within SMEs. These six pillars of open innovation practices are knowledge and technology sourcing activities; innovation expenditure; sources of knowledge; human capital; innovation networks; and intellectual property protection. They allow the examination of this phenomenon across spatial, temporal, and firm-level dimensions. The theoretical framework proposed herein has the potential to provide useful insights on the open innovation activity of SMEs across different size, sectoral, and spatial measures. This has value for policymakers, practitioners, and academic scholars seeking to better understand the differences in open innovation activity at these levels. This can be achieved by utilizing data from Community Innovation Surveys as the main data source for measuring innovation in Europe. The harmonized nature of these surveys provides a unique opportunity for benchmarking and comparative analysis on open innovation activities of different sectors and regions utilizing the proposed framework of open innovation practices. A further impact of the methodology that we propose in this chapter is its potential integration with the annual European Innovation Scoreboard and Regional Innovation Scoreboards. Currently, such an approach is lacking from both these EU-level scoreboards.

KW - open innovation

KW - small and medium sized companies

KW - community innovation

UR - https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/9789813230972_0013

U2 - 10.1142/9789813230972_0013

DO - 10.1142/9789813230972_0013

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-981-3230-96-5

SP - 399

EP - 427

BT - Researching Open Innovation in SMEs

A2 - Vanhaverbeake, wim

A2 - Frattini, Federico

A2 - Roijakkers, Nadine

A2 - Usman, Mohammed

CY - New Jersey

ER -

Jones Evans D, Gkikas A, Rhisiart M, MacKenzie NG. Measuring open innovation in SMEs. In Vanhaverbeake W, Frattini F, Roijakkers N, Usman M, editors, Researching Open Innovation in SMEs. New Jersey. 2018. p. 399-427 https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813230972_0013