Measuring environmental injustice

how ecological debt defines a radical change in the international legal system

Jordi Jaria I Manzano, Antonio Cardesa-Salzmann, Antoni Pigrau, Susana Borràs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper takes ecological debt as a measure of environmental injustice, and appraises this idea as a driving force for change in the international legal system. Environmental justice is understood here as a fair distribution of charges and benefits derived from using natural resources, in order to provide minimal welfare standards to all human beings, including future generations. Ecological debt measures this injustice, as an unfair and illegitimate distribution of benefits and burdens within the social metabolism, including ecologically unequal exchange, as a disproportionate appropriation and impairment of common goods, such as the atmosphere. Structural features of the international system promote a lack of transparency, control and accountability of power, through a pro-growth and pro-freedom language. In theory, this discourse comes with the promise of compensation for ordinary people, but in fact it benefits only a few. Ecological debt, as a symptom of the pervasive injustice of the current balance of power, demands an equivalent response, unravelling and deconstructing real power behind the imagery of equally sovereign states. It claims a counterhegemonic agenda aiming at rebuilding international law from a pluralist, 'third world' or Southern perspective and improving the balance of power. Ecological debt should not only serve as a means of compensation, but as a conceptual definition of an unfair system of human relations, which needs change. It may also help to define the burdens to be assumed as costs for the change required in international relations, i.e. by promoting the constitutionalization of international law and providing appropriate protection to human beings under the paradigms of sustainability (not sustainable development) and equity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-393
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Political Ecology
Volume23
Issue number26
Publication statusPublished - 31 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

International law
legal system
debt
indebtedness
Sustainable development
international law
balance of power
Natural resources
Metabolism
Transparency
discourse theory
human relations
environmental justice
human being
international relations
international system
accountability
Third World
transparency
equity

Keywords

  • environmental justice
  • ecological debt
  • international law

Cite this

@article{39495f0583134020b9f04a55571427ce,
title = "Measuring environmental injustice: how ecological debt defines a radical change in the international legal system",
abstract = "This paper takes ecological debt as a measure of environmental injustice, and appraises this idea as a driving force for change in the international legal system. Environmental justice is understood here as a fair distribution of charges and benefits derived from using natural resources, in order to provide minimal welfare standards to all human beings, including future generations. Ecological debt measures this injustice, as an unfair and illegitimate distribution of benefits and burdens within the social metabolism, including ecologically unequal exchange, as a disproportionate appropriation and impairment of common goods, such as the atmosphere. Structural features of the international system promote a lack of transparency, control and accountability of power, through a pro-growth and pro-freedom language. In theory, this discourse comes with the promise of compensation for ordinary people, but in fact it benefits only a few. Ecological debt, as a symptom of the pervasive injustice of the current balance of power, demands an equivalent response, unravelling and deconstructing real power behind the imagery of equally sovereign states. It claims a counterhegemonic agenda aiming at rebuilding international law from a pluralist, 'third world' or Southern perspective and improving the balance of power. Ecological debt should not only serve as a means of compensation, but as a conceptual definition of an unfair system of human relations, which needs change. It may also help to define the burdens to be assumed as costs for the change required in international relations, i.e. by promoting the constitutionalization of international law and providing appropriate protection to human beings under the paradigms of sustainability (not sustainable development) and equity.",
keywords = "environmental justice, ecological debt, international law",
author = "Manzano, {Jordi Jaria I} and Antonio Cardesa-Salzmann and Antoni Pigrau and Susana Borr{\`a}s",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "31",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "381--393",
journal = "Journal of Political Ecology",
issn = "1073-0451",
number = "26",

}

Measuring environmental injustice : how ecological debt defines a radical change in the international legal system. / Manzano, Jordi Jaria I; Cardesa-Salzmann, Antonio; Pigrau, Antoni; Borràs, Susana.

In: Journal of Political Ecology, Vol. 23, No. 26, 31.10.2016, p. 381-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring environmental injustice

T2 - how ecological debt defines a radical change in the international legal system

AU - Manzano, Jordi Jaria I

AU - Cardesa-Salzmann, Antonio

AU - Pigrau, Antoni

AU - Borràs, Susana

PY - 2016/10/31

Y1 - 2016/10/31

N2 - This paper takes ecological debt as a measure of environmental injustice, and appraises this idea as a driving force for change in the international legal system. Environmental justice is understood here as a fair distribution of charges and benefits derived from using natural resources, in order to provide minimal welfare standards to all human beings, including future generations. Ecological debt measures this injustice, as an unfair and illegitimate distribution of benefits and burdens within the social metabolism, including ecologically unequal exchange, as a disproportionate appropriation and impairment of common goods, such as the atmosphere. Structural features of the international system promote a lack of transparency, control and accountability of power, through a pro-growth and pro-freedom language. In theory, this discourse comes with the promise of compensation for ordinary people, but in fact it benefits only a few. Ecological debt, as a symptom of the pervasive injustice of the current balance of power, demands an equivalent response, unravelling and deconstructing real power behind the imagery of equally sovereign states. It claims a counterhegemonic agenda aiming at rebuilding international law from a pluralist, 'third world' or Southern perspective and improving the balance of power. Ecological debt should not only serve as a means of compensation, but as a conceptual definition of an unfair system of human relations, which needs change. It may also help to define the burdens to be assumed as costs for the change required in international relations, i.e. by promoting the constitutionalization of international law and providing appropriate protection to human beings under the paradigms of sustainability (not sustainable development) and equity.

AB - This paper takes ecological debt as a measure of environmental injustice, and appraises this idea as a driving force for change in the international legal system. Environmental justice is understood here as a fair distribution of charges and benefits derived from using natural resources, in order to provide minimal welfare standards to all human beings, including future generations. Ecological debt measures this injustice, as an unfair and illegitimate distribution of benefits and burdens within the social metabolism, including ecologically unequal exchange, as a disproportionate appropriation and impairment of common goods, such as the atmosphere. Structural features of the international system promote a lack of transparency, control and accountability of power, through a pro-growth and pro-freedom language. In theory, this discourse comes with the promise of compensation for ordinary people, but in fact it benefits only a few. Ecological debt, as a symptom of the pervasive injustice of the current balance of power, demands an equivalent response, unravelling and deconstructing real power behind the imagery of equally sovereign states. It claims a counterhegemonic agenda aiming at rebuilding international law from a pluralist, 'third world' or Southern perspective and improving the balance of power. Ecological debt should not only serve as a means of compensation, but as a conceptual definition of an unfair system of human relations, which needs change. It may also help to define the burdens to be assumed as costs for the change required in international relations, i.e. by promoting the constitutionalization of international law and providing appropriate protection to human beings under the paradigms of sustainability (not sustainable development) and equity.

KW - environmental justice

KW - ecological debt

KW - international law

UR - http://jpe.library.arizona.edu/volume_23/Manzano.pdf

UR - http://jpe.library.arizona.edu/Volume23/Volume_23.html

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 381

EP - 393

JO - Journal of Political Ecology

JF - Journal of Political Ecology

SN - 1073-0451

IS - 26

ER -