Measurement, Monitoring and Verification: Enhanced Oil Recovery and Carbon Dioxide Storage

Fran Boait, Arash Jafar Gandomi, Gareth Johnson

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

This report assesses the differences between monitoring technology requirements for CO2 storage in a saline or depleted hydrocarbon reservoir and in a hydrocarbon reservoir, when CO2 injection is used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). First order factors dictating technology choice including geological and geographic parameters are assessed before addressing differences introduced by the choice of process (EOR or storage). A brief review of the most common monitoring technologies suitable for use in either CO2 storage operations or in CO2-EOR projects are found to not vary significantly, however the measurements and analysis do. Specific differences are highlighted, however, it is found that the largest differences in monitoring technology usage is not process related, rather it is controlled by site specific geology and geography. Where differences do exist due to process choice it is shown to be largely related to the level of characterization, baseline assessment, likely infrastructure in place and pressure management during operations. No specific different technologies or monitoring strategies are recommended for EOR over CO2 storage in either saline or depleted oil and gas reservoirs. Rather, it is recommended to assess the local site- specific conditions of any CO2 injection project including the geology, geography and the level of knowledge and understanding of the reservoir and then to build a risk based approach to selecting the appropriate monitoring technologies and deployment strategies.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationEdinburgh
Number of pages37
Publication statusPublished - 6 Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Carbon dioxide
Recovery
Monitoring
Geology
Hydrocarbons
Oils
Gases

Keywords

  • carbon capture and storage
  • CCS
  • CO2-EOR
  • enhanced oil recovery

Cite this

@book{d9e36379e053423780fa7214dc2d1ba2,
title = "Measurement, Monitoring and Verification: Enhanced Oil Recovery and Carbon Dioxide Storage",
abstract = "This report assesses the differences between monitoring technology requirements for CO2 storage in a saline or depleted hydrocarbon reservoir and in a hydrocarbon reservoir, when CO2 injection is used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). First order factors dictating technology choice including geological and geographic parameters are assessed before addressing differences introduced by the choice of process (EOR or storage). A brief review of the most common monitoring technologies suitable for use in either CO2 storage operations or in CO2-EOR projects are found to not vary significantly, however the measurements and analysis do. Specific differences are highlighted, however, it is found that the largest differences in monitoring technology usage is not process related, rather it is controlled by site specific geology and geography. Where differences do exist due to process choice it is shown to be largely related to the level of characterization, baseline assessment, likely infrastructure in place and pressure management during operations. No specific different technologies or monitoring strategies are recommended for EOR over CO2 storage in either saline or depleted oil and gas reservoirs. Rather, it is recommended to assess the local site- specific conditions of any CO2 injection project including the geology, geography and the level of knowledge and understanding of the reservoir and then to build a risk based approach to selecting the appropriate monitoring technologies and deployment strategies.",
keywords = "carbon capture and storage, CCS, CO2-EOR, enhanced oil recovery",
author = "Fran Boait and Gandomi, {Arash Jafar} and Gareth Johnson",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "6",
language = "English",

}

Measurement, Monitoring and Verification : Enhanced Oil Recovery and Carbon Dioxide Storage. / Boait, Fran; Gandomi, Arash Jafar; Johnson, Gareth.

Edinburgh, 2015. 37 p.

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

TY - BOOK

T1 - Measurement, Monitoring and Verification

T2 - Enhanced Oil Recovery and Carbon Dioxide Storage

AU - Boait, Fran

AU - Gandomi, Arash Jafar

AU - Johnson, Gareth

PY - 2015/3/6

Y1 - 2015/3/6

N2 - This report assesses the differences between monitoring technology requirements for CO2 storage in a saline or depleted hydrocarbon reservoir and in a hydrocarbon reservoir, when CO2 injection is used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). First order factors dictating technology choice including geological and geographic parameters are assessed before addressing differences introduced by the choice of process (EOR or storage). A brief review of the most common monitoring technologies suitable for use in either CO2 storage operations or in CO2-EOR projects are found to not vary significantly, however the measurements and analysis do. Specific differences are highlighted, however, it is found that the largest differences in monitoring technology usage is not process related, rather it is controlled by site specific geology and geography. Where differences do exist due to process choice it is shown to be largely related to the level of characterization, baseline assessment, likely infrastructure in place and pressure management during operations. No specific different technologies or monitoring strategies are recommended for EOR over CO2 storage in either saline or depleted oil and gas reservoirs. Rather, it is recommended to assess the local site- specific conditions of any CO2 injection project including the geology, geography and the level of knowledge and understanding of the reservoir and then to build a risk based approach to selecting the appropriate monitoring technologies and deployment strategies.

AB - This report assesses the differences between monitoring technology requirements for CO2 storage in a saline or depleted hydrocarbon reservoir and in a hydrocarbon reservoir, when CO2 injection is used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). First order factors dictating technology choice including geological and geographic parameters are assessed before addressing differences introduced by the choice of process (EOR or storage). A brief review of the most common monitoring technologies suitable for use in either CO2 storage operations or in CO2-EOR projects are found to not vary significantly, however the measurements and analysis do. Specific differences are highlighted, however, it is found that the largest differences in monitoring technology usage is not process related, rather it is controlled by site specific geology and geography. Where differences do exist due to process choice it is shown to be largely related to the level of characterization, baseline assessment, likely infrastructure in place and pressure management during operations. No specific different technologies or monitoring strategies are recommended for EOR over CO2 storage in either saline or depleted oil and gas reservoirs. Rather, it is recommended to assess the local site- specific conditions of any CO2 injection project including the geology, geography and the level of knowledge and understanding of the reservoir and then to build a risk based approach to selecting the appropriate monitoring technologies and deployment strategies.

KW - carbon capture and storage

KW - CCS

KW - CO2-EOR

KW - enhanced oil recovery

M3 - Commissioned report

BT - Measurement, Monitoring and Verification

CY - Edinburgh

ER -