Meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR)

C. Thornley, F. Gibb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the question of whether the differences between meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR) have implications for the use of philosophy in supporting research in IR. The approach takes the form of a conceptual analysis and literature review. There are some differences in the role of meaning in terms of purpose, content and use which should be clarified in order to assist a productive relationship between the philosophy of language and IR. This provides some new theoretical insights into the philosophical context of IR. It suggests that further productive work on the central concepts within IR could be achieved through the use of a methodology which analyses how exactly these concepts are discussed in other disciplines and the implications of any differences in the way in which they may operate in IR. The paper suggests a new perspective on the relationship between philosophy and IR by exploring the role of meaning in these respective disciplines and highlighting differences, as well as similarities, with particular reference to the role of information as well as meaning in IR. This contributes to an understanding of two of the central concepts in IR, meaning and information, and the ways in which they are related. There is a history of work in IR and information science (IS) examining dilemmas and the paper builds on this work by relating it to some similar dilemmas in philosophy. Thus it develops the theory and conceptual understanding of IR by suggesting that philosophy could be used as a way of exploring intractable dilemmas in IR.
LanguageEnglish
Pages133-150
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Documentation
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Information retrieval
information retrieval
philosophy
philosophy of language
Information science
information science

Keywords

  • information retrieval
  • information theory
  • meaning
  • philosophy

Cite this

@article{dbc0f0be8f064de38ebaf96acabab2f8,
title = "Meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR)",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to explore the question of whether the differences between meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR) have implications for the use of philosophy in supporting research in IR. The approach takes the form of a conceptual analysis and literature review. There are some differences in the role of meaning in terms of purpose, content and use which should be clarified in order to assist a productive relationship between the philosophy of language and IR. This provides some new theoretical insights into the philosophical context of IR. It suggests that further productive work on the central concepts within IR could be achieved through the use of a methodology which analyses how exactly these concepts are discussed in other disciplines and the implications of any differences in the way in which they may operate in IR. The paper suggests a new perspective on the relationship between philosophy and IR by exploring the role of meaning in these respective disciplines and highlighting differences, as well as similarities, with particular reference to the role of information as well as meaning in IR. This contributes to an understanding of two of the central concepts in IR, meaning and information, and the ways in which they are related. There is a history of work in IR and information science (IS) examining dilemmas and the paper builds on this work by relating it to some similar dilemmas in philosophy. Thus it develops the theory and conceptual understanding of IR by suggesting that philosophy could be used as a way of exploring intractable dilemmas in IR.",
keywords = "information retrieval, information theory, meaning, philosophy",
author = "C. Thornley and F. Gibb",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1108/00220410910926158",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "133--150",
journal = "Journal of Documentation",
issn = "0022-0418",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "1",

}

Meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR). / Thornley, C.; Gibb, F.

In: Journal of Documentation, Vol. 65, No. 1, 2009, p. 133-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR)

AU - Thornley, C.

AU - Gibb, F.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to explore the question of whether the differences between meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR) have implications for the use of philosophy in supporting research in IR. The approach takes the form of a conceptual analysis and literature review. There are some differences in the role of meaning in terms of purpose, content and use which should be clarified in order to assist a productive relationship between the philosophy of language and IR. This provides some new theoretical insights into the philosophical context of IR. It suggests that further productive work on the central concepts within IR could be achieved through the use of a methodology which analyses how exactly these concepts are discussed in other disciplines and the implications of any differences in the way in which they may operate in IR. The paper suggests a new perspective on the relationship between philosophy and IR by exploring the role of meaning in these respective disciplines and highlighting differences, as well as similarities, with particular reference to the role of information as well as meaning in IR. This contributes to an understanding of two of the central concepts in IR, meaning and information, and the ways in which they are related. There is a history of work in IR and information science (IS) examining dilemmas and the paper builds on this work by relating it to some similar dilemmas in philosophy. Thus it develops the theory and conceptual understanding of IR by suggesting that philosophy could be used as a way of exploring intractable dilemmas in IR.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to explore the question of whether the differences between meaning in philosophy and meaning in information retrieval (IR) have implications for the use of philosophy in supporting research in IR. The approach takes the form of a conceptual analysis and literature review. There are some differences in the role of meaning in terms of purpose, content and use which should be clarified in order to assist a productive relationship between the philosophy of language and IR. This provides some new theoretical insights into the philosophical context of IR. It suggests that further productive work on the central concepts within IR could be achieved through the use of a methodology which analyses how exactly these concepts are discussed in other disciplines and the implications of any differences in the way in which they may operate in IR. The paper suggests a new perspective on the relationship between philosophy and IR by exploring the role of meaning in these respective disciplines and highlighting differences, as well as similarities, with particular reference to the role of information as well as meaning in IR. This contributes to an understanding of two of the central concepts in IR, meaning and information, and the ways in which they are related. There is a history of work in IR and information science (IS) examining dilemmas and the paper builds on this work by relating it to some similar dilemmas in philosophy. Thus it develops the theory and conceptual understanding of IR by suggesting that philosophy could be used as a way of exploring intractable dilemmas in IR.

KW - information retrieval

KW - information theory

KW - meaning

KW - philosophy

U2 - 10.1108/00220410910926158

DO - 10.1108/00220410910926158

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 133

EP - 150

JO - Journal of Documentation

T2 - Journal of Documentation

JF - Journal of Documentation

SN - 0022-0418

IS - 1

ER -