Maritime safety – to measure is to improve

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Design for Safety philosophy and the ensuing formalized methodology, Risk-Based Design, was introduced in the maritime industry in the mid-nineties as a design paradigm to help bestow safety as a design objective and a life-cycle imperative. This was meant to ensure that rendering safety a design driver, would incentivize the industry to seek for cost-effective safety solutions, in response to rising societal expectations for human life safety. It turned out that the removal of rules-imposed (largely-conservative) constraints and the adoption of a performance-based approach to address safety has had much more profound effects than originally anticipated, the full impact of which is yet to be delivered. This paper focuses on what constitutes the kernel of this design philosophy, namely the measurement and verification of safety itself with emphasis on passenger ships and the implications that this entails with regards to traditional approaches and the new safety system.
LanguageEnglish
Pages61-69
Number of pages9
JournalMarine Systems and Ocean Technology
Volume8
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Security systems
Life cycle
Industry
Ships
Costs

Keywords

  • design for safety
  • risk-based design (RBD)
  • safety measurement and verification
  • life-cycle risk management

Cite this

@article{d82db10eb87b45109b6de58c8ba4b170,
title = "Maritime safety – to measure is to improve",
abstract = "The Design for Safety philosophy and the ensuing formalized methodology, Risk-Based Design, was introduced in the maritime industry in the mid-nineties as a design paradigm to help bestow safety as a design objective and a life-cycle imperative. This was meant to ensure that rendering safety a design driver, would incentivize the industry to seek for cost-effective safety solutions, in response to rising societal expectations for human life safety. It turned out that the removal of rules-imposed (largely-conservative) constraints and the adoption of a performance-based approach to address safety has had much more profound effects than originally anticipated, the full impact of which is yet to be delivered. This paper focuses on what constitutes the kernel of this design philosophy, namely the measurement and verification of safety itself with emphasis on passenger ships and the implications that this entails with regards to traditional approaches and the new safety system.",
keywords = "design for safety, risk-based design (RBD), safety measurement and verification, life-cycle risk management",
author = "Dracos Vassalos",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "61--69",
journal = "Marine Systems and Ocean Technology",
issn = "1679-3962",
number = "1",

}

Maritime safety – to measure is to improve. / Vassalos, Dracos.

In: Marine Systems and Ocean Technology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.06.2013, p. 61-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Maritime safety – to measure is to improve

AU - Vassalos, Dracos

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - The Design for Safety philosophy and the ensuing formalized methodology, Risk-Based Design, was introduced in the maritime industry in the mid-nineties as a design paradigm to help bestow safety as a design objective and a life-cycle imperative. This was meant to ensure that rendering safety a design driver, would incentivize the industry to seek for cost-effective safety solutions, in response to rising societal expectations for human life safety. It turned out that the removal of rules-imposed (largely-conservative) constraints and the adoption of a performance-based approach to address safety has had much more profound effects than originally anticipated, the full impact of which is yet to be delivered. This paper focuses on what constitutes the kernel of this design philosophy, namely the measurement and verification of safety itself with emphasis on passenger ships and the implications that this entails with regards to traditional approaches and the new safety system.

AB - The Design for Safety philosophy and the ensuing formalized methodology, Risk-Based Design, was introduced in the maritime industry in the mid-nineties as a design paradigm to help bestow safety as a design objective and a life-cycle imperative. This was meant to ensure that rendering safety a design driver, would incentivize the industry to seek for cost-effective safety solutions, in response to rising societal expectations for human life safety. It turned out that the removal of rules-imposed (largely-conservative) constraints and the adoption of a performance-based approach to address safety has had much more profound effects than originally anticipated, the full impact of which is yet to be delivered. This paper focuses on what constitutes the kernel of this design philosophy, namely the measurement and verification of safety itself with emphasis on passenger ships and the implications that this entails with regards to traditional approaches and the new safety system.

KW - design for safety

KW - risk-based design (RBD)

KW - safety measurement and verification

KW - life-cycle risk management

UR - http://www.sobena.org.br/msot/volume.htm

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 61

EP - 69

JO - Marine Systems and Ocean Technology

T2 - Marine Systems and Ocean Technology

JF - Marine Systems and Ocean Technology

SN - 1679-3962

IS - 1

ER -