Abstract
Introduction: We have developed BCW, a smartphone app giving users feedback on their walking speed by degrading the audio quality of music listened to whilst walking. For the studied cadence range, BCW uses the standard Android step-counter algorithms.
Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the standard Android step-counter algorithms for detecting steps from different i. cadences, ii. body placements, iii. smartphones of identical models.
Methods: A walking cadence of 70 steps/min (spm) and 100spm for 5min was used; dictated by a metronome. 6 smartphone devices (Honorx6a) were used (two each placed on hip, arm, lower back) and were rotated between tests (repeated 3times). Validity and reliability were assessed using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).
Results: Validity across all placements improved at greater cadences (70spm:MAPE=8.0±1.3%, 100spm:MAPE=2.0±0.7%). The hip placement showed the highest validity at 70spm (MAPE=6.7±2.1%), compared to arm (MAPE=7.9±4.2%) and back (MAPE=9.3±5.1%). At 100spm, variation between placements was minimal (arm:MAPE=1.5±0.4%, hip:MAPE=2.7±0.8%, back:MAPE=1.9±0.8%). There was notable variation in accuracy between smartphone devices at 70spm (fig1a) compared to 100spm (fig1b).
Conclusion: BCW appears to be a valid and reliable app for monitoring steps. Variability between devices of the same smartphone model must be accounted for in future studies.
Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the standard Android step-counter algorithms for detecting steps from different i. cadences, ii. body placements, iii. smartphones of identical models.
Methods: A walking cadence of 70 steps/min (spm) and 100spm for 5min was used; dictated by a metronome. 6 smartphone devices (Honorx6a) were used (two each placed on hip, arm, lower back) and were rotated between tests (repeated 3times). Validity and reliability were assessed using mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).
Results: Validity across all placements improved at greater cadences (70spm:MAPE=8.0±1.3%, 100spm:MAPE=2.0±0.7%). The hip placement showed the highest validity at 70spm (MAPE=6.7±2.1%), compared to arm (MAPE=7.9±4.2%) and back (MAPE=9.3±5.1%). At 100spm, variation between placements was minimal (arm:MAPE=1.5±0.4%, hip:MAPE=2.7±0.8%, back:MAPE=1.9±0.8%). There was notable variation in accuracy between smartphone devices at 70spm (fig1a) compared to 100spm (fig1b).
Conclusion: BCW appears to be a valid and reliable app for monitoring steps. Variability between devices of the same smartphone model must be accounted for in future studies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | PA514 |
| Journal | European Respiratory Journal |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | Suppl 69 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 18 Nov 2025 |
| Event | ERS Congress 2025 - Amsterdam, Netherlands Duration: 27 Sept 2025 → 1 Oct 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Marching to a different beat: validity and reliability of the BeatClearWalker app to support walking exercise using music'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver