Managing researcher development: ‘drastic transition’?

Rowena Murray, E. Cunningham

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Academics are expected to write for publication and meet publication targets in research assessment processes. These targets are set by national bodies and institutions, and they can be daunting for academics at the start of a research career. This article reports on an intervention designed to address this issue, writer’s retreat, where academics simultaneously engaged with research assessment and developed writing projects. Using Gardner’s model of researcher development, an evaluation study showed that retreat participants quickly adopted the programmatic element, made some progress in the relational element, but made little or no progress with the personal element. This analysis shows that the structured, facilitated writer’s retreat is an effective method of researcher development, and points to specific areas where development did and did not occur. It shows that this new retreat format allows emerging researchers to negotiate their relationship with research assessment through writing, but it also identifies areas where further support is needed.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages831-845
    Number of pages15
    JournalStudies in Higher Education
    Volume36
    Issue number7
    Early online date31 Jan 2011
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    writer
    development area
    career
    evaluation

    Keywords

    • managing
    • researcher
    • development

    Cite this

    Murray, Rowena ; Cunningham, E. / Managing researcher development : ‘drastic transition’?. In: Studies in Higher Education. 2011 ; Vol. 36, No. 7. pp. 831-845.
    @article{2db0c9e9bf6948dda408fa0af058d453,
    title = "Managing researcher development: ‘drastic transition’?",
    abstract = "Academics are expected to write for publication and meet publication targets in research assessment processes. These targets are set by national bodies and institutions, and they can be daunting for academics at the start of a research career. This article reports on an intervention designed to address this issue, writer’s retreat, where academics simultaneously engaged with research assessment and developed writing projects. Using Gardner’s model of researcher development, an evaluation study showed that retreat participants quickly adopted the programmatic element, made some progress in the relational element, but made little or no progress with the personal element. This analysis shows that the structured, facilitated writer’s retreat is an effective method of researcher development, and points to specific areas where development did and did not occur. It shows that this new retreat format allows emerging researchers to negotiate their relationship with research assessment through writing, but it also identifies areas where further support is needed.",
    keywords = "managing, researcher, development",
    author = "Rowena Murray and E. Cunningham",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1080/03075079.2010.482204",
    language = "English",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "831--845",
    journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
    issn = "0307-5079",
    number = "7",

    }

    Managing researcher development : ‘drastic transition’? / Murray, Rowena; Cunningham, E.

    In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 36, No. 7, 2011, p. 831-845.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Managing researcher development

    T2 - Studies in Higher Education

    AU - Murray, Rowena

    AU - Cunningham, E.

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Academics are expected to write for publication and meet publication targets in research assessment processes. These targets are set by national bodies and institutions, and they can be daunting for academics at the start of a research career. This article reports on an intervention designed to address this issue, writer’s retreat, where academics simultaneously engaged with research assessment and developed writing projects. Using Gardner’s model of researcher development, an evaluation study showed that retreat participants quickly adopted the programmatic element, made some progress in the relational element, but made little or no progress with the personal element. This analysis shows that the structured, facilitated writer’s retreat is an effective method of researcher development, and points to specific areas where development did and did not occur. It shows that this new retreat format allows emerging researchers to negotiate their relationship with research assessment through writing, but it also identifies areas where further support is needed.

    AB - Academics are expected to write for publication and meet publication targets in research assessment processes. These targets are set by national bodies and institutions, and they can be daunting for academics at the start of a research career. This article reports on an intervention designed to address this issue, writer’s retreat, where academics simultaneously engaged with research assessment and developed writing projects. Using Gardner’s model of researcher development, an evaluation study showed that retreat participants quickly adopted the programmatic element, made some progress in the relational element, but made little or no progress with the personal element. This analysis shows that the structured, facilitated writer’s retreat is an effective method of researcher development, and points to specific areas where development did and did not occur. It shows that this new retreat format allows emerging researchers to negotiate their relationship with research assessment through writing, but it also identifies areas where further support is needed.

    KW - managing

    KW - researcher

    KW - development

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858407852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2010.482204

    U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2010.482204

    DO - 10.1080/03075079.2010.482204

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 831

    EP - 845

    JO - Studies in Higher Education

    JF - Studies in Higher Education

    SN - 0307-5079

    IS - 7

    ER -