Abstract
As evidenced through both a historical record of project over-runs and a large number of projects currently under media spotlight for cost over-runs e.g.
Edinburgh Tram system, managing projects can be a risky business. Managers are faced with effectively engaging and working with often a multitude of parties
(suppliers, government, consultants, general public and own staff), anticipating and dealing with a wealth of often interlocking uncertainties (ranging from technological innovation to force majeure), and often undertaking these activities within a compressed timeframe (which exacerbates the situation) This paper
describes a risk management process that has been developed to assist managers facing such situations. The process explicitly engages a range of stakeholders using a group decision support system (allowing for equality of view) and causal mapping process (which facilitates the surfacing of risks along with their ramifications), and thus provides not only a comprehensive appreciation of the totality of the risks identified but also a greater understanding of their subtleties, consequences etc. The paper will discuss a real case where the process was used to gain an understanding of the risks associated with developing a new energy system. The paper will describe the process and its implications, before reflecting on the insights, limitations
and future research.
Edinburgh Tram system, managing projects can be a risky business. Managers are faced with effectively engaging and working with often a multitude of parties
(suppliers, government, consultants, general public and own staff), anticipating and dealing with a wealth of often interlocking uncertainties (ranging from technological innovation to force majeure), and often undertaking these activities within a compressed timeframe (which exacerbates the situation) This paper
describes a risk management process that has been developed to assist managers facing such situations. The process explicitly engages a range of stakeholders using a group decision support system (allowing for equality of view) and causal mapping process (which facilitates the surfacing of risks along with their ramifications), and thus provides not only a comprehensive appreciation of the totality of the risks identified but also a greater understanding of their subtleties, consequences etc. The paper will discuss a real case where the process was used to gain an understanding of the risks associated with developing a new energy system. The paper will describe the process and its implications, before reflecting on the insights, limitations
and future research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Unpublished - 4 Sept 2012 |
Event | OR54 Annual Conference 2012 - Edinburgh First, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom Duration: 4 Sept 2012 → 6 Sept 2012 http://www.theorsociety.com/Pages/Conferences/OR54/OR54.aspx |
Conference
Conference | OR54 Annual Conference 2012 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | OR54 |
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Edinburgh |
Period | 4/09/12 → 6/09/12 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- project management
- risk management approaches
- stakeholder engagement