Managing labour: UK and Australian employers in comparative perspective

Arthur J. McIvor, Christopher Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The exceptionalism of Australian industrial relations has long been asserted. In particular, the Australian system of industrial arbitration has been argued to contrast markedly with other countries, such as Britain, which developed a more 'voluntarist' model of industrial regulation. However this distinction relies upon limited historical research of workplace-level developments. In this paper, we focus on a comparative analysis of employer practice in British and Australian workplaces during the first half of the twentieth century. While we find some differences in the nature and extent of management control between the British and Australian experience, what is more striking are the strong similarities in employer practice in work organisation, employment and industrial relations. While economic and institutional factors explain differences in employer practice, fundamental similarities appear to relate to the close economic and social linkages between British and Australian business.
LanguageEnglish
Pages45-62
Number of pages17
JournalLabour History
Volume88
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

employer
industrial relations
labor
workplace
work organization
arbitration
institutional factors
economic factors
twentieth century
regulation
management
economics
Employers
Labor
experience
Work place
Industrial relations
Economics
Industrial Relations
Work Place

Keywords

  • labour
  • Australia
  • United Kingdom
  • industrial relations
  • employer practice

Cite this

@article{bf54cfe2c49043a3bd4c946cb7bc7500,
title = "Managing labour: UK and Australian employers in comparative perspective",
abstract = "The exceptionalism of Australian industrial relations has long been asserted. In particular, the Australian system of industrial arbitration has been argued to contrast markedly with other countries, such as Britain, which developed a more 'voluntarist' model of industrial regulation. However this distinction relies upon limited historical research of workplace-level developments. In this paper, we focus on a comparative analysis of employer practice in British and Australian workplaces during the first half of the twentieth century. While we find some differences in the nature and extent of management control between the British and Australian experience, what is more striking are the strong similarities in employer practice in work organisation, employment and industrial relations. While economic and institutional factors explain differences in employer practice, fundamental similarities appear to relate to the close economic and social linkages between British and Australian business.",
keywords = "labour, Australia, United Kingdom, industrial relations, employer practice",
author = "McIvor, {Arthur J.} and Christopher Wright",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "45--62",
journal = "Labour History",
issn = "0023-6942",
publisher = "Australian Society for the Study of Labour History",

}

Managing labour: UK and Australian employers in comparative perspective. / McIvor, Arthur J.; Wright, Christopher.

In: Labour History, Vol. 88, 2005, p. 45-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing labour: UK and Australian employers in comparative perspective

AU - McIvor, Arthur J.

AU - Wright, Christopher

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The exceptionalism of Australian industrial relations has long been asserted. In particular, the Australian system of industrial arbitration has been argued to contrast markedly with other countries, such as Britain, which developed a more 'voluntarist' model of industrial regulation. However this distinction relies upon limited historical research of workplace-level developments. In this paper, we focus on a comparative analysis of employer practice in British and Australian workplaces during the first half of the twentieth century. While we find some differences in the nature and extent of management control between the British and Australian experience, what is more striking are the strong similarities in employer practice in work organisation, employment and industrial relations. While economic and institutional factors explain differences in employer practice, fundamental similarities appear to relate to the close economic and social linkages between British and Australian business.

AB - The exceptionalism of Australian industrial relations has long been asserted. In particular, the Australian system of industrial arbitration has been argued to contrast markedly with other countries, such as Britain, which developed a more 'voluntarist' model of industrial regulation. However this distinction relies upon limited historical research of workplace-level developments. In this paper, we focus on a comparative analysis of employer practice in British and Australian workplaces during the first half of the twentieth century. While we find some differences in the nature and extent of management control between the British and Australian experience, what is more striking are the strong similarities in employer practice in work organisation, employment and industrial relations. While economic and institutional factors explain differences in employer practice, fundamental similarities appear to relate to the close economic and social linkages between British and Australian business.

KW - labour

KW - Australia

KW - United Kingdom

KW - industrial relations

KW - employer practice

UR - http://www.historycooperative.org/cgi-bin/justtop.cgi?act=justtop&ur

UR - http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lab/88/mcivor.html

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 45

EP - 62

JO - Labour History

T2 - Labour History

JF - Labour History

SN - 0023-6942

ER -