Management science process — subjectivity in problem identification

Colin Eden, David Sims

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    It is our view that not having available a method that can handle subjective views limits the client in the description that he can give to the consultant; he assumes that the consultant is only equipped to handle certain types of information, and there is no point in giving him other types. Such a limitation may leave the client feeling that he has not had the opportunity to describe the features that are the most important ones for him. The experience of most consultants is that when the client is given the freedom to express in his own language that which he feels is important, he will gradually warm to his subject (the problem). This will enable him to tell the consultant about a variety of qualitative and attitudinal factors which are crucial to an understanding of the organizational setting of his problem. Many of these factors are related anecdotally, as “tidbits” of tasty information. These tidbits are usually important aspects of the development of a consultant-client relationship, and yet there has not been available a method for explicitly modeling their significance within the problem.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)68-74
    Number of pages7
    JournalInterfaces
    Volume11
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 1981

    Fingerprint

    Management science
    Subjectivity
    Identification problem
    Consultants

    Keywords

    • management science process
    • subjectivity
    • problem identification
    • professional
    • OR/MS philosophy
    • client-consultant relationship
    • organisational setting
    • consultant-client relationship

    Cite this

    @article{e586bcb2848f492d8d3975281e005f59,
    title = "Management science process — subjectivity in problem identification",
    abstract = "It is our view that not having available a method that can handle subjective views limits the client in the description that he can give to the consultant; he assumes that the consultant is only equipped to handle certain types of information, and there is no point in giving him other types. Such a limitation may leave the client feeling that he has not had the opportunity to describe the features that are the most important ones for him. The experience of most consultants is that when the client is given the freedom to express in his own language that which he feels is important, he will gradually warm to his subject (the problem). This will enable him to tell the consultant about a variety of qualitative and attitudinal factors which are crucial to an understanding of the organizational setting of his problem. Many of these factors are related anecdotally, as “tidbits” of tasty information. These tidbits are usually important aspects of the development of a consultant-client relationship, and yet there has not been available a method for explicitly modeling their significance within the problem.",
    keywords = "management science process, subjectivity, problem identification, professional, OR/MS philosophy, client-consultant relationship, organisational setting, consultant-client relationship",
    author = "Colin Eden and David Sims",
    year = "1981",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1287/inte.11.1.68",
    language = "English",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "68--74",
    journal = "Interfaces",
    issn = "0092-2102",
    number = "1",

    }

    Management science process — subjectivity in problem identification. / Eden, Colin; Sims, David.

    In: Interfaces, Vol. 11, No. 1, 02.1981, p. 68-74.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Management science process — subjectivity in problem identification

    AU - Eden, Colin

    AU - Sims, David

    PY - 1981/2

    Y1 - 1981/2

    N2 - It is our view that not having available a method that can handle subjective views limits the client in the description that he can give to the consultant; he assumes that the consultant is only equipped to handle certain types of information, and there is no point in giving him other types. Such a limitation may leave the client feeling that he has not had the opportunity to describe the features that are the most important ones for him. The experience of most consultants is that when the client is given the freedom to express in his own language that which he feels is important, he will gradually warm to his subject (the problem). This will enable him to tell the consultant about a variety of qualitative and attitudinal factors which are crucial to an understanding of the organizational setting of his problem. Many of these factors are related anecdotally, as “tidbits” of tasty information. These tidbits are usually important aspects of the development of a consultant-client relationship, and yet there has not been available a method for explicitly modeling their significance within the problem.

    AB - It is our view that not having available a method that can handle subjective views limits the client in the description that he can give to the consultant; he assumes that the consultant is only equipped to handle certain types of information, and there is no point in giving him other types. Such a limitation may leave the client feeling that he has not had the opportunity to describe the features that are the most important ones for him. The experience of most consultants is that when the client is given the freedom to express in his own language that which he feels is important, he will gradually warm to his subject (the problem). This will enable him to tell the consultant about a variety of qualitative and attitudinal factors which are crucial to an understanding of the organizational setting of his problem. Many of these factors are related anecdotally, as “tidbits” of tasty information. These tidbits are usually important aspects of the development of a consultant-client relationship, and yet there has not been available a method for explicitly modeling their significance within the problem.

    KW - management science process

    KW - subjectivity

    KW - problem identification

    KW - professional

    KW - OR/MS philosophy

    KW - client-consultant relationship

    KW - organisational setting

    KW - consultant-client relationship

    U2 - 10.1287/inte.11.1.68

    DO - 10.1287/inte.11.1.68

    M3 - Article

    VL - 11

    SP - 68

    EP - 74

    JO - Interfaces

    JF - Interfaces

    SN - 0092-2102

    IS - 1

    ER -