Management decision making by the analytic hierarchy process

a proposed modification for large-scale problems.

Rafikul Islam, Nur Anisah Abdullah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The use of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making is sometimes marred by the laborious effort of conducting a large number of pairwise comparisons, especially in the presence of a large number of criteria. The present empirical study attempts to investigate the possibility of eliminating insignificant criteria in order to reduce AHP computational time. Using Expert Choice software, findings confirmed that criteria assigned with comparatively lesser weights can be excluded from the hierarchy and thereby the total time required for making pairwise comparisons is reduced. To solve large-scale enterprise multi-criteria decision-making problems (that involve large number of criteria) by AHP, it is proposed that, at the very outset, decision-makers can apply nominal group technique to identify the more significant criteria and drop lesser important criteria from the list. This proposed methodology is expected to enhance the applicability of AHP in solving various kinds of larger sized multi-criteria decision-making problems in any enterprise.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-40
Number of pages23
JournalJournal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development
Volume3
Issue number1/2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Management decision-making
Analytic hierarchy process
Multicriteria decision-making
Pairwise comparisons
Empirical study
Software
Decision making
Decision maker
Methodology
Nominal group technique

Keywords

  • analytic hierarchy process
  • decision support
  • MCDM
  • international business
  • large scale problems

Cite this

@article{91fbe4a9121e44a684293278deda834a,
title = "Management decision making by the analytic hierarchy process: a proposed modification for large-scale problems.",
abstract = "The use of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making is sometimes marred by the laborious effort of conducting a large number of pairwise comparisons, especially in the presence of a large number of criteria. The present empirical study attempts to investigate the possibility of eliminating insignificant criteria in order to reduce AHP computational time. Using Expert Choice software, findings confirmed that criteria assigned with comparatively lesser weights can be excluded from the hierarchy and thereby the total time required for making pairwise comparisons is reduced. To solve large-scale enterprise multi-criteria decision-making problems (that involve large number of criteria) by AHP, it is proposed that, at the very outset, decision-makers can apply nominal group technique to identify the more significant criteria and drop lesser important criteria from the list. This proposed methodology is expected to enhance the applicability of AHP in solving various kinds of larger sized multi-criteria decision-making problems in any enterprise.",
keywords = "analytic hierarchy process, decision support, MCDM, international business, large scale problems",
author = "Rafikul Islam and Abdullah, {Nur Anisah}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1504/JIBED.2006.011949",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "18--40",
journal = "Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development",
issn = "1549-9324",
number = "1/2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management decision making by the analytic hierarchy process

T2 - a proposed modification for large-scale problems.

AU - Islam, Rafikul

AU - Abdullah, Nur Anisah

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The use of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making is sometimes marred by the laborious effort of conducting a large number of pairwise comparisons, especially in the presence of a large number of criteria. The present empirical study attempts to investigate the possibility of eliminating insignificant criteria in order to reduce AHP computational time. Using Expert Choice software, findings confirmed that criteria assigned with comparatively lesser weights can be excluded from the hierarchy and thereby the total time required for making pairwise comparisons is reduced. To solve large-scale enterprise multi-criteria decision-making problems (that involve large number of criteria) by AHP, it is proposed that, at the very outset, decision-makers can apply nominal group technique to identify the more significant criteria and drop lesser important criteria from the list. This proposed methodology is expected to enhance the applicability of AHP in solving various kinds of larger sized multi-criteria decision-making problems in any enterprise.

AB - The use of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for decision making is sometimes marred by the laborious effort of conducting a large number of pairwise comparisons, especially in the presence of a large number of criteria. The present empirical study attempts to investigate the possibility of eliminating insignificant criteria in order to reduce AHP computational time. Using Expert Choice software, findings confirmed that criteria assigned with comparatively lesser weights can be excluded from the hierarchy and thereby the total time required for making pairwise comparisons is reduced. To solve large-scale enterprise multi-criteria decision-making problems (that involve large number of criteria) by AHP, it is proposed that, at the very outset, decision-makers can apply nominal group technique to identify the more significant criteria and drop lesser important criteria from the list. This proposed methodology is expected to enhance the applicability of AHP in solving various kinds of larger sized multi-criteria decision-making problems in any enterprise.

KW - analytic hierarchy process

KW - decision support

KW - MCDM

KW - international business

KW - large scale problems

UR - https://www.inderscience.com/jhome.php?jcode=jibed

U2 - 10.1504/JIBED.2006.011949

DO - 10.1504/JIBED.2006.011949

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 18

EP - 40

JO - Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development

JF - Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development

SN - 1549-9324

IS - 1/2

ER -