Making the macroeconomic case for CCS?

Research output: Contribution to conferenceSpeech

Abstract

The UK’s decision to scrap its CCS commercialisation competition brings into sharp focus an urgent need to consider the economic service role of capture, transport and storage activities. In July 2016 a spending review briefing by the National Audit Office noted that, while agreeing with the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) that CCS is required to meet UK carbon targets, “HM Treasury raised concerns about the merits of the carbon capture and storage competition given fiscal constraints”. We consider how some key omissions in the information provided to HM Treasury (HMT) by DECC may have contributed to the decision to cancel the competition, focussing around how the wider economic case was not fully made or communicated in an effective manner. Given that the UK Government seems to retain the belief that CCS is likely to be necessary and play a crucial role in the future energy system and low carbon economy, we argue that it is necessary to quantify solidly grounded scenarios for the role that the capture, transport and storage elements can play in an economic service context.
LanguageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 11 May 2017
EventAll Energy 2017 - SECC, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Duration: 10 May 201711 May 2017

Exhibition

ExhibitionAll Energy 2017
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityGlasgow
Period10/05/1711/05/17

Fingerprint

Climate change
Economics
Carbon capture
Carbon
Macroeconomics
Energy
Scenarios
Commercialization
Government
Scrap
Audit
Carbon capture and storage
Energy systems
Fiscal

Keywords

  • macroeconomics
  • carbon capture and storage
  • CCS

Cite this

Turner, K., & Race, J. (2017). Making the macroeconomic case for CCS?. All Energy 2017, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Turner, Karen ; Race, Julia. / Making the macroeconomic case for CCS?. All Energy 2017, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
@conference{c5483dd7367144279adbce1c905f32fc,
title = "Making the macroeconomic case for CCS?",
abstract = "The UK’s decision to scrap its CCS commercialisation competition brings into sharp focus an urgent need to consider the economic service role of capture, transport and storage activities. In July 2016 a spending review briefing by the National Audit Office noted that, while agreeing with the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) that CCS is required to meet UK carbon targets, “HM Treasury raised concerns about the merits of the carbon capture and storage competition given fiscal constraints”. We consider how some key omissions in the information provided to HM Treasury (HMT) by DECC may have contributed to the decision to cancel the competition, focussing around how the wider economic case was not fully made or communicated in an effective manner. Given that the UK Government seems to retain the belief that CCS is likely to be necessary and play a crucial role in the future energy system and low carbon economy, we argue that it is necessary to quantify solidly grounded scenarios for the role that the capture, transport and storage elements can play in an economic service context.",
keywords = "macroeconomics, carbon capture and storage, CCS",
author = "Karen Turner and Julia Race",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "11",
language = "English",
note = "All Energy 2017 ; Conference date: 10-05-2017 Through 11-05-2017",

}

Turner, K & Race, J 2017, 'Making the macroeconomic case for CCS?' All Energy 2017, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 10/05/17 - 11/05/17, .

Making the macroeconomic case for CCS? / Turner, Karen; Race, Julia.

2017. All Energy 2017, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceSpeech

TY - CONF

T1 - Making the macroeconomic case for CCS?

AU - Turner, Karen

AU - Race, Julia

PY - 2017/5/11

Y1 - 2017/5/11

N2 - The UK’s decision to scrap its CCS commercialisation competition brings into sharp focus an urgent need to consider the economic service role of capture, transport and storage activities. In July 2016 a spending review briefing by the National Audit Office noted that, while agreeing with the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) that CCS is required to meet UK carbon targets, “HM Treasury raised concerns about the merits of the carbon capture and storage competition given fiscal constraints”. We consider how some key omissions in the information provided to HM Treasury (HMT) by DECC may have contributed to the decision to cancel the competition, focussing around how the wider economic case was not fully made or communicated in an effective manner. Given that the UK Government seems to retain the belief that CCS is likely to be necessary and play a crucial role in the future energy system and low carbon economy, we argue that it is necessary to quantify solidly grounded scenarios for the role that the capture, transport and storage elements can play in an economic service context.

AB - The UK’s decision to scrap its CCS commercialisation competition brings into sharp focus an urgent need to consider the economic service role of capture, transport and storage activities. In July 2016 a spending review briefing by the National Audit Office noted that, while agreeing with the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) that CCS is required to meet UK carbon targets, “HM Treasury raised concerns about the merits of the carbon capture and storage competition given fiscal constraints”. We consider how some key omissions in the information provided to HM Treasury (HMT) by DECC may have contributed to the decision to cancel the competition, focussing around how the wider economic case was not fully made or communicated in an effective manner. Given that the UK Government seems to retain the belief that CCS is likely to be necessary and play a crucial role in the future energy system and low carbon economy, we argue that it is necessary to quantify solidly grounded scenarios for the role that the capture, transport and storage elements can play in an economic service context.

KW - macroeconomics

KW - carbon capture and storage

KW - CCS

UR - http://www.all-energy.co.uk/Conference/2017-Presentations/

M3 - Speech

ER -

Turner K, Race J. Making the macroeconomic case for CCS?. 2017. All Energy 2017, Glasgow, United Kingdom.