Making scenario interventions matter: exploring issues of power and rationality

George Cairns, George Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article, we consider prospects for long-term impact from scenario projects, specifically for sustained positive change. We outline scenario methods intended to actively engage scenario development team members who will be directly impacted by the ‘focal issue’ of the scenario exercise, in particular those who are remote and by and large excluded from the central decision making processes of the powerful. We consider possibilities for building capacity for them to envisage and enact alternative futures for themselves and their communities. However, we see a need to consider how current powerful actors might respond to the wishes and actions of less powerful stakeholders, positing that the potential for action by these less powerful groups may be disrupted by the rationality of the more powerful, where any intended action is against the latter’s interests. We argue that understanding and appreciating issues of power and rationality are central to how such participatory approaches might elicit coordinated and articulated action in response to positive scenarios. We discuss this issue by reference to contemporary interpretations of Aristotelian phronēsis, or ‘practical wisdom’. We outline steps involved in enacting an augmented scenario model that responds to this critique.
LanguageEnglish
Article numbere10
JournalFutures & Foresight Science
Volume1
Issue number1
Early online date18 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

rationality
scenario
decision making process
wisdom
stakeholder
interpretation
community
Group

Keywords

  • scenario
  • phronēsis
  • stakeholder
  • agency
  • rationality
  • power

Cite this

@article{58082bde1d974316b72a679d7152e279,
title = "Making scenario interventions matter: exploring issues of power and rationality",
abstract = "In this article, we consider prospects for long-term impact from scenario projects, specifically for sustained positive change. We outline scenario methods intended to actively engage scenario development team members who will be directly impacted by the ‘focal issue’ of the scenario exercise, in particular those who are remote and by and large excluded from the central decision making processes of the powerful. We consider possibilities for building capacity for them to envisage and enact alternative futures for themselves and their communities. However, we see a need to consider how current powerful actors might respond to the wishes and actions of less powerful stakeholders, positing that the potential for action by these less powerful groups may be disrupted by the rationality of the more powerful, where any intended action is against the latter’s interests. We argue that understanding and appreciating issues of power and rationality are central to how such participatory approaches might elicit coordinated and articulated action in response to positive scenarios. We discuss this issue by reference to contemporary interpretations of Aristotelian phronēsis, or ‘practical wisdom’. We outline steps involved in enacting an augmented scenario model that responds to this critique.",
keywords = "scenario, phronēsis, stakeholder, agency, rationality, power",
author = "George Cairns and George Wright",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ffo2.10",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
journal = "Futures & Foresight Science",
issn = "2573-5152",
number = "1",

}

Making scenario interventions matter : exploring issues of power and rationality. / Cairns, George; Wright, George.

In: Futures & Foresight Science, Vol. 1, No. 1, e10, 01.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making scenario interventions matter

T2 - Futures & Foresight Science

AU - Cairns, George

AU - Wright, George

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - In this article, we consider prospects for long-term impact from scenario projects, specifically for sustained positive change. We outline scenario methods intended to actively engage scenario development team members who will be directly impacted by the ‘focal issue’ of the scenario exercise, in particular those who are remote and by and large excluded from the central decision making processes of the powerful. We consider possibilities for building capacity for them to envisage and enact alternative futures for themselves and their communities. However, we see a need to consider how current powerful actors might respond to the wishes and actions of less powerful stakeholders, positing that the potential for action by these less powerful groups may be disrupted by the rationality of the more powerful, where any intended action is against the latter’s interests. We argue that understanding and appreciating issues of power and rationality are central to how such participatory approaches might elicit coordinated and articulated action in response to positive scenarios. We discuss this issue by reference to contemporary interpretations of Aristotelian phronēsis, or ‘practical wisdom’. We outline steps involved in enacting an augmented scenario model that responds to this critique.

AB - In this article, we consider prospects for long-term impact from scenario projects, specifically for sustained positive change. We outline scenario methods intended to actively engage scenario development team members who will be directly impacted by the ‘focal issue’ of the scenario exercise, in particular those who are remote and by and large excluded from the central decision making processes of the powerful. We consider possibilities for building capacity for them to envisage and enact alternative futures for themselves and their communities. However, we see a need to consider how current powerful actors might respond to the wishes and actions of less powerful stakeholders, positing that the potential for action by these less powerful groups may be disrupted by the rationality of the more powerful, where any intended action is against the latter’s interests. We argue that understanding and appreciating issues of power and rationality are central to how such participatory approaches might elicit coordinated and articulated action in response to positive scenarios. We discuss this issue by reference to contemporary interpretations of Aristotelian phronēsis, or ‘practical wisdom’. We outline steps involved in enacting an augmented scenario model that responds to this critique.

KW - scenario

KW - phronēsis

KW - stakeholder

KW - agency

KW - rationality

KW - power

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/25735152

U2 - 10.1002/ffo2.10

DO - 10.1002/ffo2.10

M3 - Article

VL - 1

JO - Futures & Foresight Science

JF - Futures & Foresight Science

SN - 2573-5152

IS - 1

M1 - e10

ER -