Mainstreaming the Disability Equality Duty and the impact on public authorities' working practices

Charlotte Pearson, Nick Watson, Kirsten Stalker, Jo Ferrie, Jennifer Lerpiniere, Kevin Paterson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    37 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Implemented as part of the 2005 amendments to the Disability Equality Act, the Disability Equality Duty (DED) placed new and important demands on public sector bodies. All such organisations are required to develop policies and working practices which actively promote the equality of disabled people as employees, consumers or visitors. The promotion of equality has to be proactive as opposed to reactive and must be mainstreamed into the normal day to day activities of organisational working practices. Whilst the DED follows on from the framework of previous anti-discrimination legislation set in place over the last fifteen years, it represents a significant change in equality legislation, demands that public sector bodies instigate fundamental changes in their approach towards disability. This article reports on the initial stages of the implementation process of the DED across a range of public sector organisations in England, focussing in particular on how this policy has impacted on mainstreaming. Discussion shows that although organisations show awareness of mainstreaming and its implications for disability equality, there is limited evidence to suggest that the public sector has fully embraced this agenda.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)239-250
    Number of pages12
    JournalSocial Policy and Society
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Keywords

    • disability equality act
    • disability equality duty
    • equality
    • disabled people
    • employees
    • consumers
    • anti-discrimination legislation
    • public sector bodies

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mainstreaming the Disability Equality Duty and the impact on public authorities' working practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this