Magnitude scaling of induced earthquakes

Benjamin Edwards, John Douglas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Presented are the results of an earthquake magnitude homogenisation exercise for several datasets of induced earthquakes. The result of this exercise is to show that homogeneous computation of earthquake moment- and local-magnitude is useful in hazard assessment of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGSs). Data include records from EGSs in Basel (Switzerland), Soultz (France) and Cooper Basin (Australia); natural geothermal fields in Geysers (California) and Hengill (Iceland), and a gas field in Roswinkel (Netherlands). Published catalogue magnitudes are shown to differ widely with respect to Mw, with up to a unit of magnitude difference. We explore the scaling between maximum-amplitude and moment-related scales. We find that given a common magnitude definition for the respective types, the scaling between moment- and local-magnitude of small earthquakes follows a second-order polynomial, consistent with previous studies of natural seismicity. Using both the Southern-California ML scale and a PGV-magnitude scale (Mequiv) determined in this study, we find that the datasets fall into two subsets with well-defined relation to Mw: Basel, Geysers and Hengill in one and Soultz and Roswinkel in another (Cooper Basin data were not considered for this part of the analysis because of the limited bandwidth of the instruments). Mequiv is shown to correlate 1:1 with ML, albeit with region-specific offsets, while the distinct subsets in the Mequiv to MW scaling leads us to conclude that source and/or attenuation properties between the respective regions are different.

LanguageEnglish
Pages132-139
Number of pages8
JournalGeothermics
Volume52
Early online date17 Oct 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2014

Fingerprint

Earthquakes
Geysers
earthquake
Geothermal fields
Hazards
Polynomials
earthquake magnitude
hazard assessment
Bandwidth
gas field
basin
seismicity
Gases
enhanced geothermal system

Keywords

  • amplification
  • attenuation
  • earthquakes
  • induced seismicity
  • magnitude
  • moment
  • peak ground velocity

Cite this

Edwards, Benjamin ; Douglas, John. / Magnitude scaling of induced earthquakes. In: Geothermics. 2014 ; Vol. 52. pp. 132-139.
@article{8139a1881f8141699486d4998832c2bd,
title = "Magnitude scaling of induced earthquakes",
abstract = "Presented are the results of an earthquake magnitude homogenisation exercise for several datasets of induced earthquakes. The result of this exercise is to show that homogeneous computation of earthquake moment- and local-magnitude is useful in hazard assessment of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGSs). Data include records from EGSs in Basel (Switzerland), Soultz (France) and Cooper Basin (Australia); natural geothermal fields in Geysers (California) and Hengill (Iceland), and a gas field in Roswinkel (Netherlands). Published catalogue magnitudes are shown to differ widely with respect to Mw, with up to a unit of magnitude difference. We explore the scaling between maximum-amplitude and moment-related scales. We find that given a common magnitude definition for the respective types, the scaling between moment- and local-magnitude of small earthquakes follows a second-order polynomial, consistent with previous studies of natural seismicity. Using both the Southern-California ML scale and a PGV-magnitude scale (Mequiv) determined in this study, we find that the datasets fall into two subsets with well-defined relation to Mw: Basel, Geysers and Hengill in one and Soultz and Roswinkel in another (Cooper Basin data were not considered for this part of the analysis because of the limited bandwidth of the instruments). Mequiv is shown to correlate 1:1 with ML, albeit with region-specific offsets, while the distinct subsets in the Mequiv to MW scaling leads us to conclude that source and/or attenuation properties between the respective regions are different.",
keywords = "amplification, attenuation, earthquakes, induced seismicity, magnitude, moment, peak ground velocity",
author = "Benjamin Edwards and John Douglas",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.09.012",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "132--139",
journal = "Geothermics",
issn = "0375-6505",

}

Magnitude scaling of induced earthquakes. / Edwards, Benjamin; Douglas, John.

In: Geothermics, Vol. 52, 10.2014, p. 132-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnitude scaling of induced earthquakes

AU - Edwards, Benjamin

AU - Douglas, John

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - Presented are the results of an earthquake magnitude homogenisation exercise for several datasets of induced earthquakes. The result of this exercise is to show that homogeneous computation of earthquake moment- and local-magnitude is useful in hazard assessment of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGSs). Data include records from EGSs in Basel (Switzerland), Soultz (France) and Cooper Basin (Australia); natural geothermal fields in Geysers (California) and Hengill (Iceland), and a gas field in Roswinkel (Netherlands). Published catalogue magnitudes are shown to differ widely with respect to Mw, with up to a unit of magnitude difference. We explore the scaling between maximum-amplitude and moment-related scales. We find that given a common magnitude definition for the respective types, the scaling between moment- and local-magnitude of small earthquakes follows a second-order polynomial, consistent with previous studies of natural seismicity. Using both the Southern-California ML scale and a PGV-magnitude scale (Mequiv) determined in this study, we find that the datasets fall into two subsets with well-defined relation to Mw: Basel, Geysers and Hengill in one and Soultz and Roswinkel in another (Cooper Basin data were not considered for this part of the analysis because of the limited bandwidth of the instruments). Mequiv is shown to correlate 1:1 with ML, albeit with region-specific offsets, while the distinct subsets in the Mequiv to MW scaling leads us to conclude that source and/or attenuation properties between the respective regions are different.

AB - Presented are the results of an earthquake magnitude homogenisation exercise for several datasets of induced earthquakes. The result of this exercise is to show that homogeneous computation of earthquake moment- and local-magnitude is useful in hazard assessment of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGSs). Data include records from EGSs in Basel (Switzerland), Soultz (France) and Cooper Basin (Australia); natural geothermal fields in Geysers (California) and Hengill (Iceland), and a gas field in Roswinkel (Netherlands). Published catalogue magnitudes are shown to differ widely with respect to Mw, with up to a unit of magnitude difference. We explore the scaling between maximum-amplitude and moment-related scales. We find that given a common magnitude definition for the respective types, the scaling between moment- and local-magnitude of small earthquakes follows a second-order polynomial, consistent with previous studies of natural seismicity. Using both the Southern-California ML scale and a PGV-magnitude scale (Mequiv) determined in this study, we find that the datasets fall into two subsets with well-defined relation to Mw: Basel, Geysers and Hengill in one and Soultz and Roswinkel in another (Cooper Basin data were not considered for this part of the analysis because of the limited bandwidth of the instruments). Mequiv is shown to correlate 1:1 with ML, albeit with region-specific offsets, while the distinct subsets in the Mequiv to MW scaling leads us to conclude that source and/or attenuation properties between the respective regions are different.

KW - amplification

KW - attenuation

KW - earthquakes

KW - induced seismicity

KW - magnitude

KW - moment

KW - peak ground velocity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906088040&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.09.012

DO - 10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.09.012

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 132

EP - 139

JO - Geothermics

T2 - Geothermics

JF - Geothermics

SN - 0375-6505

ER -