Lung cancer stigma: a concept with consequences for patients

Roma Maguire, Liane Lewis, Grigorios Kotronoulas, John McPhelim, Robert Milroy, Janine Cataldo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Patients with lung cancer (LC) report lower quality of life (QoL) and higher levels of psychological distress compared to other cancer populations. Lung cancer stigma (LCS) may in part explain these findings. 
Aim: We investigated the prevalence of patient-perceived lung cancer stigma (LCS) and its relationships to symptom burden/severity, depression, and deficits in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). 
Methods: In this descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study, 201 participants were sent questionnaires. These included The Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS); the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale; the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale; and the Quality of Life Inventory. 
Results: Participants were on average 69 years old, 52% women, 95% ever smokers, and 18.5% current smokers. The mean total CLCSS score was 53.1 (SD=14.1; range=31-94). LCS was significantly correlated with younger age (p<0.001), greater social deprivation (p<0.05), being unemployed (p<0.001), depression (p<0.001), symptom burden (p<0.001), and HR-QoL deficits (p<0.001). Symptom burden explained 18% of variance in LCS (p<0.001). LCS explained 8.5% and 14.3% of the variance in depression (p<0.001) and HR-QoL (p<0.001), respectively. 
Conclusion: Patients with lung cancer are vulnerable to LCS. Symptom burden can directly contribute to greater perceived LCS. Greater perceived LCS can be directly related to greater levels of depression and lower HR-QoL. A tailored approach is required to screen for LCS and implement interventions to enhance the psycho-social well-being of patients with perceived LCS.
LanguageEnglish
Article numbere1201
JournalCancer Reports
Early online date24 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Lung Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Epidemiologic Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Psychology
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • health-related stigma
  • cancer
  • clinical care
  • oncology
  • psychological well-being

Cite this

Maguire, R., Lewis, L., Kotronoulas, G., McPhelim, J., Milroy, R., & Cataldo, J. (2019). Lung cancer stigma: a concept with consequences for patients. [e1201]. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1201
Maguire, Roma ; Lewis, Liane ; Kotronoulas, Grigorios ; McPhelim, John ; Milroy, Robert ; Cataldo, Janine. / Lung cancer stigma : a concept with consequences for patients. 2019.
@article{44e607ac550949c18a3cdc6faa7f9749,
title = "Lung cancer stigma: a concept with consequences for patients",
abstract = "Background: Patients with lung cancer (LC) report lower quality of life (QoL) and higher levels of psychological distress compared to other cancer populations. Lung cancer stigma (LCS) may in part explain these findings. Aim: We investigated the prevalence of patient-perceived lung cancer stigma (LCS) and its relationships to symptom burden/severity, depression, and deficits in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Methods: In this descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study, 201 participants were sent questionnaires. These included The Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS); the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale; the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale; and the Quality of Life Inventory. Results: Participants were on average 69 years old, 52{\%} women, 95{\%} ever smokers, and 18.5{\%} current smokers. The mean total CLCSS score was 53.1 (SD=14.1; range=31-94). LCS was significantly correlated with younger age (p<0.001), greater social deprivation (p<0.05), being unemployed (p<0.001), depression (p<0.001), symptom burden (p<0.001), and HR-QoL deficits (p<0.001). Symptom burden explained 18{\%} of variance in LCS (p<0.001). LCS explained 8.5{\%} and 14.3{\%} of the variance in depression (p<0.001) and HR-QoL (p<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Patients with lung cancer are vulnerable to LCS. Symptom burden can directly contribute to greater perceived LCS. Greater perceived LCS can be directly related to greater levels of depression and lower HR-QoL. A tailored approach is required to screen for LCS and implement interventions to enhance the psycho-social well-being of patients with perceived LCS.",
keywords = "health-related stigma, cancer, clinical care, oncology, psychological well-being",
author = "Roma Maguire and Liane Lewis and Grigorios Kotronoulas and John McPhelim and Robert Milroy and Janine Cataldo",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1002/cnr2.1201",
language = "English",

}

Lung cancer stigma : a concept with consequences for patients. / Maguire, Roma; Lewis, Liane; Kotronoulas, Grigorios; McPhelim, John; Milroy, Robert; Cataldo, Janine.

24.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lung cancer stigma

T2 - a concept with consequences for patients

AU - Maguire, Roma

AU - Lewis, Liane

AU - Kotronoulas, Grigorios

AU - McPhelim, John

AU - Milroy, Robert

AU - Cataldo, Janine

PY - 2019/6/24

Y1 - 2019/6/24

N2 - Background: Patients with lung cancer (LC) report lower quality of life (QoL) and higher levels of psychological distress compared to other cancer populations. Lung cancer stigma (LCS) may in part explain these findings. Aim: We investigated the prevalence of patient-perceived lung cancer stigma (LCS) and its relationships to symptom burden/severity, depression, and deficits in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Methods: In this descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study, 201 participants were sent questionnaires. These included The Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS); the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale; the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale; and the Quality of Life Inventory. Results: Participants were on average 69 years old, 52% women, 95% ever smokers, and 18.5% current smokers. The mean total CLCSS score was 53.1 (SD=14.1; range=31-94). LCS was significantly correlated with younger age (p<0.001), greater social deprivation (p<0.05), being unemployed (p<0.001), depression (p<0.001), symptom burden (p<0.001), and HR-QoL deficits (p<0.001). Symptom burden explained 18% of variance in LCS (p<0.001). LCS explained 8.5% and 14.3% of the variance in depression (p<0.001) and HR-QoL (p<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Patients with lung cancer are vulnerable to LCS. Symptom burden can directly contribute to greater perceived LCS. Greater perceived LCS can be directly related to greater levels of depression and lower HR-QoL. A tailored approach is required to screen for LCS and implement interventions to enhance the psycho-social well-being of patients with perceived LCS.

AB - Background: Patients with lung cancer (LC) report lower quality of life (QoL) and higher levels of psychological distress compared to other cancer populations. Lung cancer stigma (LCS) may in part explain these findings. Aim: We investigated the prevalence of patient-perceived lung cancer stigma (LCS) and its relationships to symptom burden/severity, depression, and deficits in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Methods: In this descriptive, observational and cross-sectional study, 201 participants were sent questionnaires. These included The Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS); the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale; the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale; and the Quality of Life Inventory. Results: Participants were on average 69 years old, 52% women, 95% ever smokers, and 18.5% current smokers. The mean total CLCSS score was 53.1 (SD=14.1; range=31-94). LCS was significantly correlated with younger age (p<0.001), greater social deprivation (p<0.05), being unemployed (p<0.001), depression (p<0.001), symptom burden (p<0.001), and HR-QoL deficits (p<0.001). Symptom burden explained 18% of variance in LCS (p<0.001). LCS explained 8.5% and 14.3% of the variance in depression (p<0.001) and HR-QoL (p<0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Patients with lung cancer are vulnerable to LCS. Symptom burden can directly contribute to greater perceived LCS. Greater perceived LCS can be directly related to greater levels of depression and lower HR-QoL. A tailored approach is required to screen for LCS and implement interventions to enhance the psycho-social well-being of patients with perceived LCS.

KW - health-related stigma

KW - cancer

KW - clinical care

KW - oncology

KW - psychological well-being

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/25738348

U2 - 10.1002/cnr2.1201

DO - 10.1002/cnr2.1201

M3 - Article

M1 - e1201

ER -