Lower limb alignment and laxity measures before, during and after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study

Jon V. Clarke, Angela H. Deakin, Frederic Picard, Philip E. Riches

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. This study compared knee alignment and laxity in patients before, during and after total knee arthroplasty, using methodologically similar procedures, with an aim to help inform pre-operative planning.Methods. Eighteen male and 13 female patients were recruited, mean age 66 years (51-82) and mean body mass index of 33 (23-43). All were assessed pre- and postoperatively using a non-invasive infrared position capture system and all underwent total knee arthroplasty using a navigation system. Knee kinematic data were collected and comparisons made between preoperative clinical and intraoperative measurements for osteoarthritic knees, and between postoperative clinical and intraoperative measurements for prosthetic knees. Findings. There was no difference in unstressed coronal mechanical femoral-tibial angles for either osteoarthritic or prosthetic knees. However, for sagittal alignment the knees were in greater extension intraoperatively (osteoarthritic 5.2° p<0.001, prosthetic 7.2° p<0.001). For osteoarthritic knees, both varus and valgus stress manoeuvres had greater angular displacements intraoperatively by a mean value of 1.5° for varus (p=0.002) and 1.6° for valgus (p<0.001). For prosthetic knees, only valgus angular displacement was greater intraoperatively (0.9°, p=0.002).
LanguageEnglish
JournalClinical Biomechanics
Early online date26 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 May 2017

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Prosthetics
Lower Extremity
Knee
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
Navigation systems
Kinematics
Infrared radiation
Planning
Thigh
Biomechanical Phenomena
Body Mass Index

Keywords

  • total knee arthroplasty
  • lower limb alignment
  • soft tissue laxity
  • non-invasive infrared tracking
  • computer assisted surgery

Cite this

@article{403b1e40bfc245098aa18e2ad952749e,
title = "Lower limb alignment and laxity measures before, during and after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study",
abstract = "Background. This study compared knee alignment and laxity in patients before, during and after total knee arthroplasty, using methodologically similar procedures, with an aim to help inform pre-operative planning.Methods. Eighteen male and 13 female patients were recruited, mean age 66 years (51-82) and mean body mass index of 33 (23-43). All were assessed pre- and postoperatively using a non-invasive infrared position capture system and all underwent total knee arthroplasty using a navigation system. Knee kinematic data were collected and comparisons made between preoperative clinical and intraoperative measurements for osteoarthritic knees, and between postoperative clinical and intraoperative measurements for prosthetic knees. Findings. There was no difference in unstressed coronal mechanical femoral-tibial angles for either osteoarthritic or prosthetic knees. However, for sagittal alignment the knees were in greater extension intraoperatively (osteoarthritic 5.2° p<0.001, prosthetic 7.2° p<0.001). For osteoarthritic knees, both varus and valgus stress manoeuvres had greater angular displacements intraoperatively by a mean value of 1.5° for varus (p=0.002) and 1.6° for valgus (p<0.001). For prosthetic knees, only valgus angular displacement was greater intraoperatively (0.9°, p=0.002).",
keywords = "total knee arthroplasty, lower limb alignment, soft tissue laxity, non-invasive infrared tracking, computer assisted surgery",
author = "Clarke, {Jon V.} and Deakin, {Angela H.} and Frederic Picard and Riches, {Philip E.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.05.013",
language = "English",
journal = "Clinical Biomechanics",
issn = "0268-0033",

}

Lower limb alignment and laxity measures before, during and after total knee arthroplasty : a prospective cohort study. / Clarke, Jon V.; Deakin, Angela H.; Picard, Frederic; Riches, Philip E.

In: Clinical Biomechanics, 26.05.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lower limb alignment and laxity measures before, during and after total knee arthroplasty

T2 - Clinical Biomechanics

AU - Clarke, Jon V.

AU - Deakin, Angela H.

AU - Picard, Frederic

AU - Riches, Philip E.

PY - 2017/5/26

Y1 - 2017/5/26

N2 - Background. This study compared knee alignment and laxity in patients before, during and after total knee arthroplasty, using methodologically similar procedures, with an aim to help inform pre-operative planning.Methods. Eighteen male and 13 female patients were recruited, mean age 66 years (51-82) and mean body mass index of 33 (23-43). All were assessed pre- and postoperatively using a non-invasive infrared position capture system and all underwent total knee arthroplasty using a navigation system. Knee kinematic data were collected and comparisons made between preoperative clinical and intraoperative measurements for osteoarthritic knees, and between postoperative clinical and intraoperative measurements for prosthetic knees. Findings. There was no difference in unstressed coronal mechanical femoral-tibial angles for either osteoarthritic or prosthetic knees. However, for sagittal alignment the knees were in greater extension intraoperatively (osteoarthritic 5.2° p<0.001, prosthetic 7.2° p<0.001). For osteoarthritic knees, both varus and valgus stress manoeuvres had greater angular displacements intraoperatively by a mean value of 1.5° for varus (p=0.002) and 1.6° for valgus (p<0.001). For prosthetic knees, only valgus angular displacement was greater intraoperatively (0.9°, p=0.002).

AB - Background. This study compared knee alignment and laxity in patients before, during and after total knee arthroplasty, using methodologically similar procedures, with an aim to help inform pre-operative planning.Methods. Eighteen male and 13 female patients were recruited, mean age 66 years (51-82) and mean body mass index of 33 (23-43). All were assessed pre- and postoperatively using a non-invasive infrared position capture system and all underwent total knee arthroplasty using a navigation system. Knee kinematic data were collected and comparisons made between preoperative clinical and intraoperative measurements for osteoarthritic knees, and between postoperative clinical and intraoperative measurements for prosthetic knees. Findings. There was no difference in unstressed coronal mechanical femoral-tibial angles for either osteoarthritic or prosthetic knees. However, for sagittal alignment the knees were in greater extension intraoperatively (osteoarthritic 5.2° p<0.001, prosthetic 7.2° p<0.001). For osteoarthritic knees, both varus and valgus stress manoeuvres had greater angular displacements intraoperatively by a mean value of 1.5° for varus (p=0.002) and 1.6° for valgus (p<0.001). For prosthetic knees, only valgus angular displacement was greater intraoperatively (0.9°, p=0.002).

KW - total knee arthroplasty

KW - lower limb alignment

KW - soft tissue laxity

KW - non-invasive infrared tracking

KW - computer assisted surgery

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02680033

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.05.013

DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.05.013

M3 - Article

JO - Clinical Biomechanics

JF - Clinical Biomechanics

SN - 0268-0033

ER -