Lost in translation? Building science and innovation city strategies in Australia and the UK

Paul Couchman, Ian McLoughlin, David Charles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the development of the ‘knowledge economy' in many advanced industrial nations, there has been a growing interest in regional innovation systems and the role that universities might play in these.

One result has been the demarcation by government actors of specific spaces for the creation, transfer and transformation of knowledge. Such spaces have been given various names, such as ‘smart regions', ‘science cities' and ‘innovation corridors'. Whilst the associated policy rhetoric has much in common with the earlier interest in science and technology parks there are also clear distinguishing differences. More recent policy initiatives have sought to foster industry clusters within these spaces to contribute to economic development and diversification and link this to economic, social and cultural regeneration.

This paper explores policy-driven creation of ‘innovation areas' by focusing on two contrasting examples: Newcastle Science City in the North East of England and the Gold Coast Pacific Innovation Corridor in Queensland, Australia. The paper compares the rhetoric of university-industry-government policies with the realities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-223
Number of pages13
JournalInnovation: Organization and Management
Volume10
Issue number2-3
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008

Keywords

  • building science
  • building technology
  • building innovation
  • Australia
  • Australian construction
  • UK construction

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Lost in translation? Building science and innovation city strategies in Australia and the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this