Looked after young people: reducing inequalities through an evidence-and theory-informed intervention

Hannah Dale, Lorna Watson, Pauline Adair, Gerald Humphris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
84 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to design and evaluate a health behaviour change intervention for looked after young people, targeting sexual health, smoking, exercise, healthy eating and non-dependent alcohol and drug use.
Design: A pre–post intervention evaluation was undertaken exploring health behaviours and wellbeing.
Methodology: The one-to-one intervention was individually tailored to each person. Young people eligible for the intervention were aged 11 years and over and were ‘looked after’, meaning they were under a supervision order with a local authority in Scotland, or were a care leaver. A total of 144 young people referred to the intervention service between March 2009 and January 2014 were eligible for the evaluation. Evaluation data were analysed using standard statistical tests on SPSS.
Results: Behaviour change techniques, including goal setting, action planning, barrier identification/problem solving and motivational interviewing contributed to improvements in all areas. Difficulties with consent and follow-up were highlighted as barriers to effective evaluation.
Conclusion: Improving the current health of looked after young people with a view to prevent future ill health using a tailored intervention with behaviour change techniques enables this group to improve health behaviours, despite numerous challenges in working with these vulnerable clients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalHealth Education Journal
Early online date11 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Feb 2016

Keywords

  • evidence-based practice
  • health
  • looked after children
  • prevention
  • Scotland

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Looked after young people: reducing inequalities through an evidence-and theory-informed intervention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this