Long-term unemployment and the "employability gap": priorities for renewing Britain's New Deal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper reviews recent reforms to the UK's main active labour market policy for the long-term unemployed aged over 25: the so-called New Deal 25 Plus. It discusses the appropriateness of the New Deal’s approach to the activation of these long-term unemployed people, by drawing upon evidence from interviews with 115 job seekers in one urban labour market characterised by generally low unemployment rates. It is argued that these job seekers face a combination of personal and circumstantial barriers to work, best characterised as an "employability gap". It is acknowledged that following recent reforms to the New Deal 25 Plus, the programme is better equipped to address some aspects of the employability gap faced by many long-term unemployed people. However, it is argued that a stronger commitment to training within a "real work" environment and a more flexible approach to the administration of some social security benefits is required if the long-term detachment from the labour market experienced by these job seekers is to be overcome.
LanguageEnglish
Pages411-419
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of European Industrial Training
Volume26
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

persistent unemployment
job seeker
employability
unemployment
labor market
reform
social security
unemployment rate
work environment
activation
commitment
interview
evidence
Job seeker
Employability
Long-term unemployment

Keywords

  • unemployment
  • welfare
  • labour market conditions
  • United Kingdom
  • UK
  • New Deal

Cite this

@article{a005aae3224f44b6ba828be11fe25829,
title = "Long-term unemployment and the {"}employability gap{"}: priorities for renewing Britain's New Deal",
abstract = "This paper reviews recent reforms to the UK's main active labour market policy for the long-term unemployed aged over 25: the so-called New Deal 25 Plus. It discusses the appropriateness of the New Deal’s approach to the activation of these long-term unemployed people, by drawing upon evidence from interviews with 115 job seekers in one urban labour market characterised by generally low unemployment rates. It is argued that these job seekers face a combination of personal and circumstantial barriers to work, best characterised as an {"}employability gap{"}. It is acknowledged that following recent reforms to the New Deal 25 Plus, the programme is better equipped to address some aspects of the employability gap faced by many long-term unemployed people. However, it is argued that a stronger commitment to training within a {"}real work{"} environment and a more flexible approach to the administration of some social security benefits is required if the long-term detachment from the labour market experienced by these job seekers is to be overcome.",
keywords = "unemployment, welfare, labour market conditions, United Kingdom, UK, New Deal",
author = "Colin Lindsay",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1108/03090590210451506",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "411--419",
journal = "European Journal of Training and Development",
issn = "2046-9012",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long-term unemployment and the "employability gap"

T2 - European Journal of Training and Development

AU - Lindsay, Colin

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This paper reviews recent reforms to the UK's main active labour market policy for the long-term unemployed aged over 25: the so-called New Deal 25 Plus. It discusses the appropriateness of the New Deal’s approach to the activation of these long-term unemployed people, by drawing upon evidence from interviews with 115 job seekers in one urban labour market characterised by generally low unemployment rates. It is argued that these job seekers face a combination of personal and circumstantial barriers to work, best characterised as an "employability gap". It is acknowledged that following recent reforms to the New Deal 25 Plus, the programme is better equipped to address some aspects of the employability gap faced by many long-term unemployed people. However, it is argued that a stronger commitment to training within a "real work" environment and a more flexible approach to the administration of some social security benefits is required if the long-term detachment from the labour market experienced by these job seekers is to be overcome.

AB - This paper reviews recent reforms to the UK's main active labour market policy for the long-term unemployed aged over 25: the so-called New Deal 25 Plus. It discusses the appropriateness of the New Deal’s approach to the activation of these long-term unemployed people, by drawing upon evidence from interviews with 115 job seekers in one urban labour market characterised by generally low unemployment rates. It is argued that these job seekers face a combination of personal and circumstantial barriers to work, best characterised as an "employability gap". It is acknowledged that following recent reforms to the New Deal 25 Plus, the programme is better equipped to address some aspects of the employability gap faced by many long-term unemployed people. However, it is argued that a stronger commitment to training within a "real work" environment and a more flexible approach to the administration of some social security benefits is required if the long-term detachment from the labour market experienced by these job seekers is to be overcome.

KW - unemployment

KW - welfare

KW - labour market conditions

KW - United Kingdom

KW - UK

KW - New Deal

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0309-0590

U2 - 10.1108/03090590210451506

DO - 10.1108/03090590210451506

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 411

EP - 419

JO - European Journal of Training and Development

JF - European Journal of Training and Development

SN - 2046-9012

IS - 9

ER -