Local taxation, spending and poverty: new choices and tax justice

Christine Cooper, Michael Danson, Geoff Whittam

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Abstract

In the environment of the 2014 Independence Referendum, a number of key questions have been raised about the future Scotland we want to see and live in. Core to such discussions have been the interventions on wealth creation and benefits, by the leaders of the Conservatives and Labour Parties in Scotland, respectively. However, and as rigorously debated in the Whose Economy? Seminar Series (Danson and Trebeck, 2011), such questions need to be considered in their wider contexts to identify and analyse fully all aspects of ‘who pays?’ and ‘who benefits?’. Indeed, several of the papers to that seminar series echoed previous classical work on poverty and the welfare state by Townsend, Abel-Smith and others which confirmed there are some long-standing myths to be addressed. These commentaries have suggested that all is not what it seems in the review of statistics of income and benefits, and robust, objective and clinical assessment of the data
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Poverty
Justice
Local taxation
Tax
Scotland
Labor
Welfare state
Wealth creation
Income
Statistics
Referendum

Keywords

  • local taxation
  • spending and poverty
  • tax justice

Cite this

Cooper, C., Danson, M., & Whittam, G. (2013). Local taxation, spending and poverty: new choices and tax justice.
Cooper, Christine ; Danson, Michael ; Whittam, Geoff. / Local taxation, spending and poverty : new choices and tax justice. 2013.
@techreport{102e0d928c4540c7b696c5b05c189b8a,
title = "Local taxation, spending and poverty: new choices and tax justice",
abstract = "In the environment of the 2014 Independence Referendum, a number of key questions have been raised about the future Scotland we want to see and live in. Core to such discussions have been the interventions on wealth creation and benefits, by the leaders of the Conservatives and Labour Parties in Scotland, respectively. However, and as rigorously debated in the Whose Economy? Seminar Series (Danson and Trebeck, 2011), such questions need to be considered in their wider contexts to identify and analyse fully all aspects of ‘who pays?’ and ‘who benefits?’. Indeed, several of the papers to that seminar series echoed previous classical work on poverty and the welfare state by Townsend, Abel-Smith and others which confirmed there are some long-standing myths to be addressed. These commentaries have suggested that all is not what it seems in the review of statistics of income and benefits, and robust, objective and clinical assessment of the data",
keywords = "local taxation, spending and poverty, tax justice",
author = "Christine Cooper and Michael Danson and Geoff Whittam",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Local taxation, spending and poverty : new choices and tax justice. / Cooper, Christine; Danson, Michael; Whittam, Geoff.

2013.

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Local taxation, spending and poverty

T2 - new choices and tax justice

AU - Cooper, Christine

AU - Danson, Michael

AU - Whittam, Geoff

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In the environment of the 2014 Independence Referendum, a number of key questions have been raised about the future Scotland we want to see and live in. Core to such discussions have been the interventions on wealth creation and benefits, by the leaders of the Conservatives and Labour Parties in Scotland, respectively. However, and as rigorously debated in the Whose Economy? Seminar Series (Danson and Trebeck, 2011), such questions need to be considered in their wider contexts to identify and analyse fully all aspects of ‘who pays?’ and ‘who benefits?’. Indeed, several of the papers to that seminar series echoed previous classical work on poverty and the welfare state by Townsend, Abel-Smith and others which confirmed there are some long-standing myths to be addressed. These commentaries have suggested that all is not what it seems in the review of statistics of income and benefits, and robust, objective and clinical assessment of the data

AB - In the environment of the 2014 Independence Referendum, a number of key questions have been raised about the future Scotland we want to see and live in. Core to such discussions have been the interventions on wealth creation and benefits, by the leaders of the Conservatives and Labour Parties in Scotland, respectively. However, and as rigorously debated in the Whose Economy? Seminar Series (Danson and Trebeck, 2011), such questions need to be considered in their wider contexts to identify and analyse fully all aspects of ‘who pays?’ and ‘who benefits?’. Indeed, several of the papers to that seminar series echoed previous classical work on poverty and the welfare state by Townsend, Abel-Smith and others which confirmed there are some long-standing myths to be addressed. These commentaries have suggested that all is not what it seems in the review of statistics of income and benefits, and robust, objective and clinical assessment of the data

KW - local taxation

KW - spending and poverty

KW - tax justice

M3 - Discussion paper

BT - Local taxation, spending and poverty

ER -