Lobbying and lawmaking in the European Union: the development of copyright law and the rejection of the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement

Benjamin Farrand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine the issue of ‘lobbying’ in the EU legislative process, using an interdisciplinary analysis of the development of copyright laws as a way of explaining why some lobbyists are more successful than others in having their preferences taken into account in legislation, and how this success is achieved. As this article will demonstrate, the keys to successful lobbying in this field are information exchange, the ability to frame issues at an early stage in the legislative process (agenda setting), and the political salience of an issue. By assessing not only where legislative initiatives in copyright reform have been successful, such as the passing of the Information Society, Enforcement and Term Extension Directives, but also where legislative initiatives fail, as in the case of ACTA, it will be demonstrated that legislative success is not a simple case of ‘big business getting what it wants’, but of varying levels of political salience. Where the salience of an issue is low and voters consider that issue comparatively unimportant to other issues, industry representatives are able to effectively frame legislative outcomes. Where salience is high, and an issue important to voters, this ability is substantially reduced. By approaching copyright law development in this way, it is possible to reconceptualise the role of lobbying in the EU legislative process.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-28
Number of pages28
JournalOxford Journal of Legal Studies
Early online date20 Jan 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

counterfeiting
Law
EU
information exchange
information society
ability
legislation
reform
industry

Keywords

  • copyright
  • EU Law
  • legislative process
  • political theory
  • salience

Cite this

@article{e6a3385d37df4eddb33b81054c09562d,
title = "Lobbying and lawmaking in the European Union: the development of copyright law and the rejection of the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement",
abstract = "The purpose of this article is to examine the issue of ‘lobbying’ in the EU legislative process, using an interdisciplinary analysis of the development of copyright laws as a way of explaining why some lobbyists are more successful than others in having their preferences taken into account in legislation, and how this success is achieved. As this article will demonstrate, the keys to successful lobbying in this field are information exchange, the ability to frame issues at an early stage in the legislative process (agenda setting), and the political salience of an issue. By assessing not only where legislative initiatives in copyright reform have been successful, such as the passing of the Information Society, Enforcement and Term Extension Directives, but also where legislative initiatives fail, as in the case of ACTA, it will be demonstrated that legislative success is not a simple case of ‘big business getting what it wants’, but of varying levels of political salience. Where the salience of an issue is low and voters consider that issue comparatively unimportant to other issues, industry representatives are able to effectively frame legislative outcomes. Where salience is high, and an issue important to voters, this ability is substantially reduced. By approaching copyright law development in this way, it is possible to reconceptualise the role of lobbying in the EU legislative process.",
keywords = "copyright, EU Law, legislative process, political theory, salience",
author = "Benjamin Farrand",
note = "This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies following peer review. The version of record [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: 10.1093/ojls/gqu028 that the author will receive upon publication here",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1093/ojls/gqu028",
language = "English",
pages = "1--28",
journal = "Oxford Journal of Legal Studies",
issn = "0143-6503",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lobbying and lawmaking in the European Union

T2 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

AU - Farrand, Benjamin

N1 - This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies following peer review. The version of record [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: 10.1093/ojls/gqu028 that the author will receive upon publication here

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The purpose of this article is to examine the issue of ‘lobbying’ in the EU legislative process, using an interdisciplinary analysis of the development of copyright laws as a way of explaining why some lobbyists are more successful than others in having their preferences taken into account in legislation, and how this success is achieved. As this article will demonstrate, the keys to successful lobbying in this field are information exchange, the ability to frame issues at an early stage in the legislative process (agenda setting), and the political salience of an issue. By assessing not only where legislative initiatives in copyright reform have been successful, such as the passing of the Information Society, Enforcement and Term Extension Directives, but also where legislative initiatives fail, as in the case of ACTA, it will be demonstrated that legislative success is not a simple case of ‘big business getting what it wants’, but of varying levels of political salience. Where the salience of an issue is low and voters consider that issue comparatively unimportant to other issues, industry representatives are able to effectively frame legislative outcomes. Where salience is high, and an issue important to voters, this ability is substantially reduced. By approaching copyright law development in this way, it is possible to reconceptualise the role of lobbying in the EU legislative process.

AB - The purpose of this article is to examine the issue of ‘lobbying’ in the EU legislative process, using an interdisciplinary analysis of the development of copyright laws as a way of explaining why some lobbyists are more successful than others in having their preferences taken into account in legislation, and how this success is achieved. As this article will demonstrate, the keys to successful lobbying in this field are information exchange, the ability to frame issues at an early stage in the legislative process (agenda setting), and the political salience of an issue. By assessing not only where legislative initiatives in copyright reform have been successful, such as the passing of the Information Society, Enforcement and Term Extension Directives, but also where legislative initiatives fail, as in the case of ACTA, it will be demonstrated that legislative success is not a simple case of ‘big business getting what it wants’, but of varying levels of political salience. Where the salience of an issue is low and voters consider that issue comparatively unimportant to other issues, industry representatives are able to effectively frame legislative outcomes. Where salience is high, and an issue important to voters, this ability is substantially reduced. By approaching copyright law development in this way, it is possible to reconceptualise the role of lobbying in the EU legislative process.

KW - copyright

KW - EU Law

KW - legislative process

KW - political theory

KW - salience

UR - http://ojls.oxfordjournals.org/content/by/year

U2 - 10.1093/ojls/gqu028

DO - 10.1093/ojls/gqu028

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 28

JO - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

JF - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

SN - 0143-6503

ER -