Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects: an empirical investigation

Arumugam Velaayudan, Jiju Antony, Maneesh Kumar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of two organizational antecedents, (1) SixSigma resources (technical) and (2) team psychological safety (social), on learning behaviour and knowledgecreation and, in turn, on the success of SixSigma process improvement projects. The paper proposes an integrated model to explain process improvement implementation success through two learning activities undertaken by SixSigmaproject teams: Knowing-what and Knowing-how. The conceptualization of these knowledge types in this research is different from usual conceptualization as it represents the knowledge brought into projects through various phases of SixSigmaprojects. The three hypotheses proposed in the model were tested using the data collected from 52 SixSigmaproject teams from a single organization. Regression analysis showed psychological safety affects project performance through knowing-how. Regression and bootstrapping analyses showed resources influence project performance through the combined mediation of knowing-what and knowing-how.

The paper provides an interdisciplinary treatment of knowledge management in process improvement teams, and offers a research model demonstrating how SixSigmaproject teams promote deliberate organizational learning. By doing so, this study empirically establishes the notion that technical and social supports jointly impact the success of operations management initiative such as SixSigma through learning. The limitations of the study along with the future research directions are highlighted.

LanguageEnglish
Pages388–402
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Production Economics
Volume141
Issue number1
Early online date19 Sep 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Knowledge management
Regression analysis
Six Sigma
Knowledge creation
Empirical investigation
Project success
Six sigma
Process improvement
Conceptualization
Psychological safety
Resources
Project performance
Learning behavior
Organizational learning
Social support
Operations management
Mediation
Bootstrapping
Knowledge types
Integrated model

Keywords

  • six sigma
  • six sigma projects
  • knowledge creation
  • team learning
  • project performance
  • psychological safety
  • knowing-how
  • knowing-what

Cite this

@article{ca9bd9218d7345c7b52d5a6ce555148a,
title = "Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects: an empirical investigation",
abstract = "This study investigates the impact of two organizational antecedents, (1) SixSigma resources (technical) and (2) team psychological safety (social), on learning behaviour and knowledgecreation and, in turn, on the success of SixSigma process improvement projects. The paper proposes an integrated model to explain process improvement implementation success through two learning activities undertaken by SixSigmaproject teams: Knowing-what and Knowing-how. The conceptualization of these knowledge types in this research is different from usual conceptualization as it represents the knowledge brought into projects through various phases of SixSigmaprojects. The three hypotheses proposed in the model were tested using the data collected from 52 SixSigmaproject teams from a single organization. Regression analysis showed psychological safety affects project performance through knowing-how. Regression and bootstrapping analyses showed resources influence project performance through the combined mediation of knowing-what and knowing-how. The paper provides an interdisciplinary treatment of knowledge management in process improvement teams, and offers a research model demonstrating how SixSigmaproject teams promote deliberate organizational learning. By doing so, this study empirically establishes the notion that technical and social supports jointly impact the success of operations management initiative such as SixSigma through learning. The limitations of the study along with the future research directions are highlighted.",
keywords = "six sigma, six sigma projects, knowledge creation, team learning, project performance, psychological safety, knowing-how, knowing-what",
author = "Arumugam Velaayudan and Jiju Antony and Maneesh Kumar",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.09.003",
language = "English",
volume = "141",
pages = "388–402",
journal = "International Journal of Production Economics",
issn = "0925-5273",
number = "1",

}

Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects : an empirical investigation. / Velaayudan, Arumugam; Antony, Jiju; Kumar, Maneesh.

In: International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 141, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 388–402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects

T2 - International Journal of Production Economics

AU - Velaayudan, Arumugam

AU - Antony, Jiju

AU - Kumar, Maneesh

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - This study investigates the impact of two organizational antecedents, (1) SixSigma resources (technical) and (2) team psychological safety (social), on learning behaviour and knowledgecreation and, in turn, on the success of SixSigma process improvement projects. The paper proposes an integrated model to explain process improvement implementation success through two learning activities undertaken by SixSigmaproject teams: Knowing-what and Knowing-how. The conceptualization of these knowledge types in this research is different from usual conceptualization as it represents the knowledge brought into projects through various phases of SixSigmaprojects. The three hypotheses proposed in the model were tested using the data collected from 52 SixSigmaproject teams from a single organization. Regression analysis showed psychological safety affects project performance through knowing-how. Regression and bootstrapping analyses showed resources influence project performance through the combined mediation of knowing-what and knowing-how. The paper provides an interdisciplinary treatment of knowledge management in process improvement teams, and offers a research model demonstrating how SixSigmaproject teams promote deliberate organizational learning. By doing so, this study empirically establishes the notion that technical and social supports jointly impact the success of operations management initiative such as SixSigma through learning. The limitations of the study along with the future research directions are highlighted.

AB - This study investigates the impact of two organizational antecedents, (1) SixSigma resources (technical) and (2) team psychological safety (social), on learning behaviour and knowledgecreation and, in turn, on the success of SixSigma process improvement projects. The paper proposes an integrated model to explain process improvement implementation success through two learning activities undertaken by SixSigmaproject teams: Knowing-what and Knowing-how. The conceptualization of these knowledge types in this research is different from usual conceptualization as it represents the knowledge brought into projects through various phases of SixSigmaprojects. The three hypotheses proposed in the model were tested using the data collected from 52 SixSigmaproject teams from a single organization. Regression analysis showed psychological safety affects project performance through knowing-how. Regression and bootstrapping analyses showed resources influence project performance through the combined mediation of knowing-what and knowing-how. The paper provides an interdisciplinary treatment of knowledge management in process improvement teams, and offers a research model demonstrating how SixSigmaproject teams promote deliberate organizational learning. By doing so, this study empirically establishes the notion that technical and social supports jointly impact the success of operations management initiative such as SixSigma through learning. The limitations of the study along with the future research directions are highlighted.

KW - six sigma

KW - six sigma projects

KW - knowledge creation

KW - team learning

KW - project performance

KW - psychological safety

KW - knowing-how

KW - knowing-what

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 141

SP - 388

EP - 402

JO - International Journal of Production Economics

JF - International Journal of Production Economics

SN - 0925-5273

IS - 1

ER -