Lingua franca

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

After briefly reviewing the origins of Relationship Marketing, and highlighting the prevalence of studies taking a practitioner viewpoint, this paper justifies the benefits in adopting a customer perspective for further RM fieldwork. Acknowledging the low level of conceptual and theoretical development in RM, it argues in favour of the application of qualitative methods in general and focus groups in particular. The main body of the paper discusses customer-respondent usage of metaphor and anthropomorphisms, drawing on the data from 20 focus groups with customers of 10 prominent firms operating in the East Midlands region of the UK. The paper presents a typology of the metaphors used, and analyses customer anthropomorphism of the firm's gender, distinguishing features and most importantly, their analogies of its relationship to them. The paper concludes that the majority of the metaphors imply a customer perspective on relationships with firms as being confrontational and competitive, rather than mutually beneficial and finishes by discussing the implications of this and the customer perception of their relationships with firms for the academy and practitioners.
LanguageEnglish
Pages195-214
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Customer Behaviour
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Focus groups
Reviewing
Qualitative methods
Customer perception

Keywords

  • metaphor
  • relationship marketing
  • anthropomorphism

Cite this

Harker, M.J. / Lingua franca. In: Journal of Customer Behaviour. 2002 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 195-214.
@article{8fa9c55472904408af297b515ff44a73,
title = "Lingua franca",
abstract = "After briefly reviewing the origins of Relationship Marketing, and highlighting the prevalence of studies taking a practitioner viewpoint, this paper justifies the benefits in adopting a customer perspective for further RM fieldwork. Acknowledging the low level of conceptual and theoretical development in RM, it argues in favour of the application of qualitative methods in general and focus groups in particular. The main body of the paper discusses customer-respondent usage of metaphor and anthropomorphisms, drawing on the data from 20 focus groups with customers of 10 prominent firms operating in the East Midlands region of the UK. The paper presents a typology of the metaphors used, and analyses customer anthropomorphism of the firm's gender, distinguishing features and most importantly, their analogies of its relationship to them. The paper concludes that the majority of the metaphors imply a customer perspective on relationships with firms as being confrontational and competitive, rather than mutually beneficial and finishes by discussing the implications of this and the customer perception of their relationships with firms for the academy and practitioners.",
keywords = "metaphor, relationship marketing, anthropomorphism",
author = "M.J. Harker",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1362/14753920260595219",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "195--214",
journal = "Journal of Customer Behaviour",
issn = "1475-3928",
number = "2",

}

Lingua franca. / Harker, M.J.

In: Journal of Customer Behaviour, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2002, p. 195-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lingua franca

AU - Harker, M.J.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - After briefly reviewing the origins of Relationship Marketing, and highlighting the prevalence of studies taking a practitioner viewpoint, this paper justifies the benefits in adopting a customer perspective for further RM fieldwork. Acknowledging the low level of conceptual and theoretical development in RM, it argues in favour of the application of qualitative methods in general and focus groups in particular. The main body of the paper discusses customer-respondent usage of metaphor and anthropomorphisms, drawing on the data from 20 focus groups with customers of 10 prominent firms operating in the East Midlands region of the UK. The paper presents a typology of the metaphors used, and analyses customer anthropomorphism of the firm's gender, distinguishing features and most importantly, their analogies of its relationship to them. The paper concludes that the majority of the metaphors imply a customer perspective on relationships with firms as being confrontational and competitive, rather than mutually beneficial and finishes by discussing the implications of this and the customer perception of their relationships with firms for the academy and practitioners.

AB - After briefly reviewing the origins of Relationship Marketing, and highlighting the prevalence of studies taking a practitioner viewpoint, this paper justifies the benefits in adopting a customer perspective for further RM fieldwork. Acknowledging the low level of conceptual and theoretical development in RM, it argues in favour of the application of qualitative methods in general and focus groups in particular. The main body of the paper discusses customer-respondent usage of metaphor and anthropomorphisms, drawing on the data from 20 focus groups with customers of 10 prominent firms operating in the East Midlands region of the UK. The paper presents a typology of the metaphors used, and analyses customer anthropomorphism of the firm's gender, distinguishing features and most importantly, their analogies of its relationship to them. The paper concludes that the majority of the metaphors imply a customer perspective on relationships with firms as being confrontational and competitive, rather than mutually beneficial and finishes by discussing the implications of this and the customer perception of their relationships with firms for the academy and practitioners.

KW - metaphor

KW - relationship marketing

KW - anthropomorphism

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1362/14753920260595219

U2 - 10.1362/14753920260595219

DO - 10.1362/14753920260595219

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 195

EP - 214

JO - Journal of Customer Behaviour

T2 - Journal of Customer Behaviour

JF - Journal of Customer Behaviour

SN - 1475-3928

IS - 2

ER -