Like or like-minded: who should be in a professional network about pedagogy?

E. Hall, Kate Wall, V.M.a Baumfield, Christopher S Towler

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

This paper reflects upon the complex interactions between the intent of the researchers, the development of a collaborative practitioner research network and the tools used to scaffold, measure and represent this process. Using a residential conference for the Learning to Learn network as a forum, we used visual methods in the form of posters as boundary objects (Heldal, 2010) to stimulate critical reflection and dialogue on the case studies presented by colleagues. Capturing responses to the work of others using a survey instrument, we have constructed network diagrams in Nvivo8 that provide a snapshot of what members of the network learned and from whom (Fox, et al., 2007). This allows us as researchers to gain an understanding as to the dynamics by which ideas are exchanged and also provides a tool by which critical reflection on the wider principles and beliefs underpinning individual case studies of pedagogy can be scaffolded. The key questions addressed in this paper are: Can the networks of influence between practitioner enquirers be predicted by their professional context, age of learners or subject discipline? If the complexity of a heterogeneous network is unpredictable, is this a potentially chaotic or creative situation and how can this be mapped?

Conference

ConferenceEuropean Conference for Education Research
CountryFinland
CityHelsinki
Period25/08/1027/08/10

Fingerprint

poster
dialogue
interaction
learning

Keywords

  • pedagogy
  • professional network
  • networking

Cite this

Hall, E., Wall, K., Baumfield, V. M. A., & Towler, C. S. (2010). Like or like-minded: who should be in a professional network about pedagogy?. Paper presented at European Conference for Education Research, Helsinki, Finland.
Hall, E. ; Wall, Kate ; Baumfield, V.M.a ; Towler, Christopher S. / Like or like-minded : who should be in a professional network about pedagogy?. Paper presented at European Conference for Education Research, Helsinki, Finland.
@conference{5f0f8b4ba5774010b0da5a75ddff5f74,
title = "Like or like-minded: who should be in a professional network about pedagogy?",
abstract = "This paper reflects upon the complex interactions between the intent of the researchers, the development of a collaborative practitioner research network and the tools used to scaffold, measure and represent this process. Using a residential conference for the Learning to Learn network as a forum, we used visual methods in the form of posters as boundary objects (Heldal, 2010) to stimulate critical reflection and dialogue on the case studies presented by colleagues. Capturing responses to the work of others using a survey instrument, we have constructed network diagrams in Nvivo8 that provide a snapshot of what members of the network learned and from whom (Fox, et al., 2007). This allows us as researchers to gain an understanding as to the dynamics by which ideas are exchanged and also provides a tool by which critical reflection on the wider principles and beliefs underpinning individual case studies of pedagogy can be scaffolded. The key questions addressed in this paper are: Can the networks of influence between practitioner enquirers be predicted by their professional context, age of learners or subject discipline? If the complexity of a heterogeneous network is unpredictable, is this a potentially chaotic or creative situation and how can this be mapped?",
keywords = "pedagogy, professional network, networking",
author = "E. Hall and Kate Wall and V.M.a Baumfield and Towler, {Christopher S}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "30",
language = "English",
note = "European Conference for Education Research ; Conference date: 25-08-2010 Through 27-08-2010",

}

Hall, E, Wall, K, Baumfield, VMA & Towler, CS 2010, 'Like or like-minded: who should be in a professional network about pedagogy?' Paper presented at European Conference for Education Research, Helsinki, Finland, 25/08/10 - 27/08/10, .

Like or like-minded : who should be in a professional network about pedagogy? / Hall, E.; Wall, Kate; Baumfield, V.M.a; Towler, Christopher S.

2010. Paper presented at European Conference for Education Research, Helsinki, Finland.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - Like or like-minded

T2 - who should be in a professional network about pedagogy?

AU - Hall, E.

AU - Wall, Kate

AU - Baumfield, V.M.a

AU - Towler, Christopher S

PY - 2010/9/30

Y1 - 2010/9/30

N2 - This paper reflects upon the complex interactions between the intent of the researchers, the development of a collaborative practitioner research network and the tools used to scaffold, measure and represent this process. Using a residential conference for the Learning to Learn network as a forum, we used visual methods in the form of posters as boundary objects (Heldal, 2010) to stimulate critical reflection and dialogue on the case studies presented by colleagues. Capturing responses to the work of others using a survey instrument, we have constructed network diagrams in Nvivo8 that provide a snapshot of what members of the network learned and from whom (Fox, et al., 2007). This allows us as researchers to gain an understanding as to the dynamics by which ideas are exchanged and also provides a tool by which critical reflection on the wider principles and beliefs underpinning individual case studies of pedagogy can be scaffolded. The key questions addressed in this paper are: Can the networks of influence between practitioner enquirers be predicted by their professional context, age of learners or subject discipline? If the complexity of a heterogeneous network is unpredictable, is this a potentially chaotic or creative situation and how can this be mapped?

AB - This paper reflects upon the complex interactions between the intent of the researchers, the development of a collaborative practitioner research network and the tools used to scaffold, measure and represent this process. Using a residential conference for the Learning to Learn network as a forum, we used visual methods in the form of posters as boundary objects (Heldal, 2010) to stimulate critical reflection and dialogue on the case studies presented by colleagues. Capturing responses to the work of others using a survey instrument, we have constructed network diagrams in Nvivo8 that provide a snapshot of what members of the network learned and from whom (Fox, et al., 2007). This allows us as researchers to gain an understanding as to the dynamics by which ideas are exchanged and also provides a tool by which critical reflection on the wider principles and beliefs underpinning individual case studies of pedagogy can be scaffolded. The key questions addressed in this paper are: Can the networks of influence between practitioner enquirers be predicted by their professional context, age of learners or subject discipline? If the complexity of a heterogeneous network is unpredictable, is this a potentially chaotic or creative situation and how can this be mapped?

KW - pedagogy

KW - professional network

KW - networking

M3 - Paper

ER -

Hall E, Wall K, Baumfield VMA, Towler CS. Like or like-minded: who should be in a professional network about pedagogy?. 2010. Paper presented at European Conference for Education Research, Helsinki, Finland.