Lies, damn lies and statistics

N. Nic Daeid

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The problems associated with the presentation of scientific evidence in court have always been challenging. Indeed, all one has to do is look back an uncomfortably few number of years for illustrations of gross misinterpretations of scientific evidence either by scientists themselves from the witness box, by
the legal experts during examination or in summation of such evidence to the jury. The difficulties in presenting and communicating often complex scientific information to a lay audience are not new. Neither are the rules by which we must operate within a legal or judicial framework, after all legal systems of
one form or another were in existence long before forensic science was applied to criminal or civil investigations. Yet, even with rules, laws of evidence and hard lessons of the past learned through the appeal courts, there are persistent and recurring difficulties in communication between the scientific expert and the
court.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12
Number of pages2
JournalScience and Justice
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Forensic Sciences
Communication

Keywords

  • lies
  • damn lies
  • statistics

Cite this

Daeid, N. Nic. / Lies, damn lies and statistics. In: Science and Justice. 2006 ; Vol. 46, No. 1. pp. 12.
@article{6d08bd673880481b99f165afe127367b,
title = "Lies, damn lies and statistics",
abstract = "The problems associated with the presentation of scientific evidence in court have always been challenging. Indeed, all one has to do is look back an uncomfortably few number of years for illustrations of gross misinterpretations of scientific evidence either by scientists themselves from the witness box, bythe legal experts during examination or in summation of such evidence to the jury. The difficulties in presenting and communicating often complex scientific information to a lay audience are not new. Neither are the rules by which we must operate within a legal or judicial framework, after all legal systems ofone form or another were in existence long before forensic science was applied to criminal or civil investigations. Yet, even with rules, laws of evidence and hard lessons of the past learned through the appeal courts, there are persistent and recurring difficulties in communication between the scientific expert and thecourt.",
keywords = "lies, damn lies, statistics",
author = "Daeid, {N. Nic}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71561-1",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "12",
journal = "Science and Justice",
issn = "1355-0306",
number = "1",

}

Lies, damn lies and statistics. / Daeid, N. Nic.

In: Science and Justice, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2006, p. 12.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lies, damn lies and statistics

AU - Daeid, N. Nic

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The problems associated with the presentation of scientific evidence in court have always been challenging. Indeed, all one has to do is look back an uncomfortably few number of years for illustrations of gross misinterpretations of scientific evidence either by scientists themselves from the witness box, bythe legal experts during examination or in summation of such evidence to the jury. The difficulties in presenting and communicating often complex scientific information to a lay audience are not new. Neither are the rules by which we must operate within a legal or judicial framework, after all legal systems ofone form or another were in existence long before forensic science was applied to criminal or civil investigations. Yet, even with rules, laws of evidence and hard lessons of the past learned through the appeal courts, there are persistent and recurring difficulties in communication between the scientific expert and thecourt.

AB - The problems associated with the presentation of scientific evidence in court have always been challenging. Indeed, all one has to do is look back an uncomfortably few number of years for illustrations of gross misinterpretations of scientific evidence either by scientists themselves from the witness box, bythe legal experts during examination or in summation of such evidence to the jury. The difficulties in presenting and communicating often complex scientific information to a lay audience are not new. Neither are the rules by which we must operate within a legal or judicial framework, after all legal systems ofone form or another were in existence long before forensic science was applied to criminal or civil investigations. Yet, even with rules, laws of evidence and hard lessons of the past learned through the appeal courts, there are persistent and recurring difficulties in communication between the scientific expert and thecourt.

KW - lies

KW - damn lies

KW - statistics

U2 - 10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71561-1

DO - 10.1016/S1355-0306(06)71561-1

M3 - Editorial

VL - 46

SP - 12

JO - Science and Justice

JF - Science and Justice

SN - 1355-0306

IS - 1

ER -