Levelised cost of energy - a theoretical justification and critical assessment

John Aldersey-Williams, Tim Rubert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although widely accepted as a measure of the comparative lifetime costs of electricity generation alternatives, levelised cost of energy (LCOE) lacks a theoretical foundation in the academic literature and encompasses a number of areas where caution is important. Therefore, this paper seeks to provide a theoretical foundation by comparing the metric with alternative cost of energy metrics and by undertaking a brief literature review to describe its strengths and weaknesses. In comparison with other potential measures of unit cost of energy, LCOE is found to be the preferred choice, in large part because of its widespread adoption. The weaknesses of the LCOE are found to centre on discount rate, inflation effects and the sensitivity of results to uncertainty in future commodity costs. These weaknesses are explored in the context of comparing combined cycle gas fired generation and offshore wind in the UK, based on publicly available cost measures. It is found that with variability of future fuel gas prices, and a Monte Carlo approach to modelling LCOE, the range of LCOE for CCGT is much broader in comparison to the LCOE of offshore wind. It is urged that explicit account be taken of the areas of weakness in future use of LCOE.

LanguageEnglish
Pages169-179
Number of pages11
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume124
Early online date15 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

cost
energy
Costs
discount rate
Gas fuels
electricity generation
literature review
inflation
gas
commodity
Electricity
Gases
modeling
comparison

Keywords

  • levelised cost of energy
  • offshore wind energy
  • Monte Carlo
  • uncertainty

Cite this

Aldersey-Williams, John ; Rubert, Tim. / Levelised cost of energy - a theoretical justification and critical assessment. In: Energy Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 124. pp. 169-179.
@article{f15fabada430489080946f2b63cca3d1,
title = "Levelised cost of energy - a theoretical justification and critical assessment",
abstract = "Although widely accepted as a measure of the comparative lifetime costs of electricity generation alternatives, levelised cost of energy (LCOE) lacks a theoretical foundation in the academic literature and encompasses a number of areas where caution is important. Therefore, this paper seeks to provide a theoretical foundation by comparing the metric with alternative cost of energy metrics and by undertaking a brief literature review to describe its strengths and weaknesses. In comparison with other potential measures of unit cost of energy, LCOE is found to be the preferred choice, in large part because of its widespread adoption. The weaknesses of the LCOE are found to centre on discount rate, inflation effects and the sensitivity of results to uncertainty in future commodity costs. These weaknesses are explored in the context of comparing combined cycle gas fired generation and offshore wind in the UK, based on publicly available cost measures. It is found that with variability of future fuel gas prices, and a Monte Carlo approach to modelling LCOE, the range of LCOE for CCGT is much broader in comparison to the LCOE of offshore wind. It is urged that explicit account be taken of the areas of weakness in future use of LCOE.",
keywords = "levelised cost of energy, offshore wind energy, Monte Carlo, uncertainty",
author = "John Aldersey-Williams and Tim Rubert",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.004",
language = "English",
volume = "124",
pages = "169--179",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",

}

Levelised cost of energy - a theoretical justification and critical assessment. / Aldersey-Williams, John; Rubert, Tim.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 124, 31.01.2019, p. 169-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Levelised cost of energy - a theoretical justification and critical assessment

AU - Aldersey-Williams, John

AU - Rubert, Tim

PY - 2019/1/31

Y1 - 2019/1/31

N2 - Although widely accepted as a measure of the comparative lifetime costs of electricity generation alternatives, levelised cost of energy (LCOE) lacks a theoretical foundation in the academic literature and encompasses a number of areas where caution is important. Therefore, this paper seeks to provide a theoretical foundation by comparing the metric with alternative cost of energy metrics and by undertaking a brief literature review to describe its strengths and weaknesses. In comparison with other potential measures of unit cost of energy, LCOE is found to be the preferred choice, in large part because of its widespread adoption. The weaknesses of the LCOE are found to centre on discount rate, inflation effects and the sensitivity of results to uncertainty in future commodity costs. These weaknesses are explored in the context of comparing combined cycle gas fired generation and offshore wind in the UK, based on publicly available cost measures. It is found that with variability of future fuel gas prices, and a Monte Carlo approach to modelling LCOE, the range of LCOE for CCGT is much broader in comparison to the LCOE of offshore wind. It is urged that explicit account be taken of the areas of weakness in future use of LCOE.

AB - Although widely accepted as a measure of the comparative lifetime costs of electricity generation alternatives, levelised cost of energy (LCOE) lacks a theoretical foundation in the academic literature and encompasses a number of areas where caution is important. Therefore, this paper seeks to provide a theoretical foundation by comparing the metric with alternative cost of energy metrics and by undertaking a brief literature review to describe its strengths and weaknesses. In comparison with other potential measures of unit cost of energy, LCOE is found to be the preferred choice, in large part because of its widespread adoption. The weaknesses of the LCOE are found to centre on discount rate, inflation effects and the sensitivity of results to uncertainty in future commodity costs. These weaknesses are explored in the context of comparing combined cycle gas fired generation and offshore wind in the UK, based on publicly available cost measures. It is found that with variability of future fuel gas prices, and a Monte Carlo approach to modelling LCOE, the range of LCOE for CCGT is much broader in comparison to the LCOE of offshore wind. It is urged that explicit account be taken of the areas of weakness in future use of LCOE.

KW - levelised cost of energy

KW - offshore wind energy

KW - Monte Carlo

KW - uncertainty

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/energy-policy

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.004

M3 - Article

VL - 124

SP - 169

EP - 179

JO - Energy Policy

T2 - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -