Lessons learnt from the closure of the 2007-13 programming period

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article is based on a study for the Committee on Regional Development of the European Parliament. It analyses the closure process for programmes funded under the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund in 2007-13. Programme closure is often seen as a purely technical process. It involves shutting down the operation of a programme, finalising the reporting and recording of results, and ensuring sound financialmanagement. However, closure also plays an important strategic role. Key decisions are taken by programme authorities at this stage: in the allocation of remaining funds; in securing and raising awareness of achievements and legacies; and, in ensuring a smooth transition to the next programming period. These decisions are taken in the context of considerable pressures: to absorb the maximum funding available; to respond to financial controls and audits that often take place around programme closure; to deal with issues arising from the implementation of specific projects; and, to ensure administrative resources are available at a time of transition between programme periods. Based on a review of academic and evaluation evidence, recent research, legislation, EC and Member State policy papers as well as evidence from EU, national and sub-national stakeholders, this article details the regulatory provisions, guidance and support provided for closure in 2007-13, and assesses the issues faced and responses made by programme authorities, summarised under three headings: absorption, types of intervention and administrative capacity.
LanguageEnglish
Pages287-298
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Structural and Investment Funds Journal
Volume5
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 11 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

programming
regional development
European Parliament
programme
group cohesion
cohesion
audit
European Community
evidence
recording
legislation
stakeholder
EU
funding
resource
evaluation
resources
decision

Keywords

  • cohesion policy
  • Structural funds
  • ERDF
  • closure

Cite this

@article{f6a78340205147f19f9813b0639e8ee5,
title = "Lessons learnt from the closure of the 2007-13 programming period",
abstract = "This article is based on a study for the Committee on Regional Development of the European Parliament. It analyses the closure process for programmes funded under the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund in 2007-13. Programme closure is often seen as a purely technical process. It involves shutting down the operation of a programme, finalising the reporting and recording of results, and ensuring sound financialmanagement. However, closure also plays an important strategic role. Key decisions are taken by programme authorities at this stage: in the allocation of remaining funds; in securing and raising awareness of achievements and legacies; and, in ensuring a smooth transition to the next programming period. These decisions are taken in the context of considerable pressures: to absorb the maximum funding available; to respond to financial controls and audits that often take place around programme closure; to deal with issues arising from the implementation of specific projects; and, to ensure administrative resources are available at a time of transition between programme periods. Based on a review of academic and evaluation evidence, recent research, legislation, EC and Member State policy papers as well as evidence from EU, national and sub-national stakeholders, this article details the regulatory provisions, guidance and support provided for closure in 2007-13, and assesses the issues faced and responses made by programme authorities, summarised under three headings: absorption, types of intervention and administrative capacity.",
keywords = "cohesion policy, Structural funds, ERDF, closure",
author = "Martin Ferry and Stefan Kah",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "11",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "287--298",
journal = "European Structural and Investment Funds Journal",
issn = "2196-8268",
number = "4",

}

Lessons learnt from the closure of the 2007-13 programming period. / Ferry, Martin; Kah, Stefan.

In: European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, 11.12.2017, p. 287-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lessons learnt from the closure of the 2007-13 programming period

AU - Ferry, Martin

AU - Kah, Stefan

PY - 2017/12/11

Y1 - 2017/12/11

N2 - This article is based on a study for the Committee on Regional Development of the European Parliament. It analyses the closure process for programmes funded under the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund in 2007-13. Programme closure is often seen as a purely technical process. It involves shutting down the operation of a programme, finalising the reporting and recording of results, and ensuring sound financialmanagement. However, closure also plays an important strategic role. Key decisions are taken by programme authorities at this stage: in the allocation of remaining funds; in securing and raising awareness of achievements and legacies; and, in ensuring a smooth transition to the next programming period. These decisions are taken in the context of considerable pressures: to absorb the maximum funding available; to respond to financial controls and audits that often take place around programme closure; to deal with issues arising from the implementation of specific projects; and, to ensure administrative resources are available at a time of transition between programme periods. Based on a review of academic and evaluation evidence, recent research, legislation, EC and Member State policy papers as well as evidence from EU, national and sub-national stakeholders, this article details the regulatory provisions, guidance and support provided for closure in 2007-13, and assesses the issues faced and responses made by programme authorities, summarised under three headings: absorption, types of intervention and administrative capacity.

AB - This article is based on a study for the Committee on Regional Development of the European Parliament. It analyses the closure process for programmes funded under the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund in 2007-13. Programme closure is often seen as a purely technical process. It involves shutting down the operation of a programme, finalising the reporting and recording of results, and ensuring sound financialmanagement. However, closure also plays an important strategic role. Key decisions are taken by programme authorities at this stage: in the allocation of remaining funds; in securing and raising awareness of achievements and legacies; and, in ensuring a smooth transition to the next programming period. These decisions are taken in the context of considerable pressures: to absorb the maximum funding available; to respond to financial controls and audits that often take place around programme closure; to deal with issues arising from the implementation of specific projects; and, to ensure administrative resources are available at a time of transition between programme periods. Based on a review of academic and evaluation evidence, recent research, legislation, EC and Member State policy papers as well as evidence from EU, national and sub-national stakeholders, this article details the regulatory provisions, guidance and support provided for closure in 2007-13, and assesses the issues faced and responses made by programme authorities, summarised under three headings: absorption, types of intervention and administrative capacity.

KW - cohesion policy

KW - Structural funds

KW - ERDF

KW - closure

UR - https://estif.lexxion.eu/article/ESTIF/2017/4/5

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 287

EP - 298

JO - European Structural and Investment Funds Journal

T2 - European Structural and Investment Funds Journal

JF - European Structural and Investment Funds Journal

SN - 2196-8268

IS - 4

ER -