Legislative context and shared practice models

James Boyle, Thomas MacKay, Fraser Lauchlan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The application of psychological theory to the practice of educational psychology does not take place in a political or conceptual vacuum: the duties of EPs in the UK have reflected the prevailing goals, values and understandings embedded in the legislation of the time (Boyle & MacKay, 2010; MacKay & Boyle, 2013; Wooldridge, 1994). In turn, EPs have influenced statutes, government circulars and guidance and local education authority policy, most notably in the areas of special educational needs and social inclusion, with more recent developments reflecting the paradigm shift of the 1970s and 1980s from a medical model of assessment and intervention to a more ecological, educational approach (Gillham, 1978; Kirkaldy, 1997). This chapter considers the impact of legislative and policy contexts upon the practice of educational psychology and the impact of this practice upon legislation and policy in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland, the four distinctive education systems of the UK. The extent to which legislation has created contexts which have given rise to shared models of practice within these systems and may thus be regarded as a framework per se in its own right for such practice will also be discussed together with the implications for future developments in the UK. Readers interested in developments outwith the UK are referred to the reviews of legislation, policy, organisation and EP practice in over 40 countries by Jimerson, Oakland & Farrell (2007) and Boyle & Lauchlan (2014) and to Dahl, Hoff, Peacock and Ervin’s (2012) review of the impact of legislation on the practice of school psychology in the US.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationFrameworks for Practice in Educational Psychology
Subtitle of host publicationA Textbook for Trainees and Practitioners
EditorsBarbara Kelly, Lisa Marks Woolfson, James Boyle
Place of PublicationLondon
Chapter3
Pages44-60
Number of pages17
Edition2nd
Publication statusPublished - 21 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Legislation
Educational Psychology
Psychological Theory
Education
Northern Ireland
Wales
Scotland
Vacuum
England
Organizations
Psychology

Keywords

  • shared practice models
  • legislative context
  • educational psychology

Cite this

Boyle, J., MacKay, T., & Lauchlan, F. (2016). Legislative context and shared practice models. In B. Kelly, L. M. Woolfson, & J. Boyle (Eds.), Frameworks for Practice in Educational Psychology: A Textbook for Trainees and Practitioners (2nd ed., pp. 44-60). London.
Boyle, James ; MacKay, Thomas ; Lauchlan, Fraser. / Legislative context and shared practice models. Frameworks for Practice in Educational Psychology: A Textbook for Trainees and Practitioners. editor / Barbara Kelly ; Lisa Marks Woolfson ; James Boyle. 2nd. ed. London, 2016. pp. 44-60
@inbook{946f1d5f903e4f33bd932ddfc55277af,
title = "Legislative context and shared practice models",
abstract = "The application of psychological theory to the practice of educational psychology does not take place in a political or conceptual vacuum: the duties of EPs in the UK have reflected the prevailing goals, values and understandings embedded in the legislation of the time (Boyle & MacKay, 2010; MacKay & Boyle, 2013; Wooldridge, 1994). In turn, EPs have influenced statutes, government circulars and guidance and local education authority policy, most notably in the areas of special educational needs and social inclusion, with more recent developments reflecting the paradigm shift of the 1970s and 1980s from a medical model of assessment and intervention to a more ecological, educational approach (Gillham, 1978; Kirkaldy, 1997). This chapter considers the impact of legislative and policy contexts upon the practice of educational psychology and the impact of this practice upon legislation and policy in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland, the four distinctive education systems of the UK. The extent to which legislation has created contexts which have given rise to shared models of practice within these systems and may thus be regarded as a framework per se in its own right for such practice will also be discussed together with the implications for future developments in the UK. Readers interested in developments outwith the UK are referred to the reviews of legislation, policy, organisation and EP practice in over 40 countries by Jimerson, Oakland & Farrell (2007) and Boyle & Lauchlan (2014) and to Dahl, Hoff, Peacock and Ervin’s (2012) review of the impact of legislation on the practice of school psychology in the US.",
keywords = "shared practice models, legislative context, educational psychology",
author = "James Boyle and Thomas MacKay and Fraser Lauchlan",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "21",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781785920073",
pages = "44--60",
editor = "Barbara Kelly and Woolfson, {Lisa Marks} and James Boyle",
booktitle = "Frameworks for Practice in Educational Psychology",
edition = "2nd",

}

Boyle, J, MacKay, T & Lauchlan, F 2016, Legislative context and shared practice models. in B Kelly, LM Woolfson & J Boyle (eds), Frameworks for Practice in Educational Psychology: A Textbook for Trainees and Practitioners. 2nd edn, London, pp. 44-60.

Legislative context and shared practice models. / Boyle, James; MacKay, Thomas; Lauchlan, Fraser.

Frameworks for Practice in Educational Psychology: A Textbook for Trainees and Practitioners. ed. / Barbara Kelly; Lisa Marks Woolfson; James Boyle. 2nd. ed. London, 2016. p. 44-60.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Legislative context and shared practice models

AU - Boyle, James

AU - MacKay, Thomas

AU - Lauchlan, Fraser

PY - 2016/12/21

Y1 - 2016/12/21

N2 - The application of psychological theory to the practice of educational psychology does not take place in a political or conceptual vacuum: the duties of EPs in the UK have reflected the prevailing goals, values and understandings embedded in the legislation of the time (Boyle & MacKay, 2010; MacKay & Boyle, 2013; Wooldridge, 1994). In turn, EPs have influenced statutes, government circulars and guidance and local education authority policy, most notably in the areas of special educational needs and social inclusion, with more recent developments reflecting the paradigm shift of the 1970s and 1980s from a medical model of assessment and intervention to a more ecological, educational approach (Gillham, 1978; Kirkaldy, 1997). This chapter considers the impact of legislative and policy contexts upon the practice of educational psychology and the impact of this practice upon legislation and policy in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland, the four distinctive education systems of the UK. The extent to which legislation has created contexts which have given rise to shared models of practice within these systems and may thus be regarded as a framework per se in its own right for such practice will also be discussed together with the implications for future developments in the UK. Readers interested in developments outwith the UK are referred to the reviews of legislation, policy, organisation and EP practice in over 40 countries by Jimerson, Oakland & Farrell (2007) and Boyle & Lauchlan (2014) and to Dahl, Hoff, Peacock and Ervin’s (2012) review of the impact of legislation on the practice of school psychology in the US.

AB - The application of psychological theory to the practice of educational psychology does not take place in a political or conceptual vacuum: the duties of EPs in the UK have reflected the prevailing goals, values and understandings embedded in the legislation of the time (Boyle & MacKay, 2010; MacKay & Boyle, 2013; Wooldridge, 1994). In turn, EPs have influenced statutes, government circulars and guidance and local education authority policy, most notably in the areas of special educational needs and social inclusion, with more recent developments reflecting the paradigm shift of the 1970s and 1980s from a medical model of assessment and intervention to a more ecological, educational approach (Gillham, 1978; Kirkaldy, 1997). This chapter considers the impact of legislative and policy contexts upon the practice of educational psychology and the impact of this practice upon legislation and policy in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland, the four distinctive education systems of the UK. The extent to which legislation has created contexts which have given rise to shared models of practice within these systems and may thus be regarded as a framework per se in its own right for such practice will also be discussed together with the implications for future developments in the UK. Readers interested in developments outwith the UK are referred to the reviews of legislation, policy, organisation and EP practice in over 40 countries by Jimerson, Oakland & Farrell (2007) and Boyle & Lauchlan (2014) and to Dahl, Hoff, Peacock and Ervin’s (2012) review of the impact of legislation on the practice of school psychology in the US.

KW - shared practice models

KW - legislative context

KW - educational psychology

UR - https://www.jkp.com/uk/frameworks-for-practice-in-educational-psychology-second-edition-1.html

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781785920073

SP - 44

EP - 60

BT - Frameworks for Practice in Educational Psychology

A2 - Kelly, Barbara

A2 - Woolfson, Lisa Marks

A2 - Boyle, James

CY - London

ER -

Boyle J, MacKay T, Lauchlan F. Legislative context and shared practice models. In Kelly B, Woolfson LM, Boyle J, editors, Frameworks for Practice in Educational Psychology: A Textbook for Trainees and Practitioners. 2nd ed. London. 2016. p. 44-60