Learning from mixed OR method practice: the NINES case study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite continued interest in the use of mixed OR/MS methods, limited attention has been paid in the literature to generic lessons that could be gained from mixing methods in practice. Many organisational problems demand the use of a mixed method approach and thus recognising and sharing lessons could prove beneficial to both practitioners and researchers. This paper reports on an in-depth evaluation of a case study involving risk identification and quantification of the Northern Isles New Energy Solutions (NINES) project which sought to trial and plan a new energy system. The intervention involved a mixed method approach and client feedback on the efficacy of the approach was sought. The evaluation reported in this paper is carried out using a set of themes taken from the literature and seeks to highlight transferable lessons. The set of lessons that emerge are presented along with their implications for both general OR modelling practice and the specific situation of mixing OR/MS methods. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of the work and directions for future work which will be of interest to both practitioners and researchers interested in mixed method OR/MS work.
LanguageEnglish
Pages70-81
Number of pages12
JournalOmega
Volume69
Early online date9 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Mixed methods
Energy
Evaluation
Quantification
Risk identification
Modeling
Efficacy
Limited attention
Energy systems

Keywords

  • mixed methods
  • causal mapping
  • decision tree
  • case study
  • risk analysis
  • evaluation

Cite this

@article{17798de392c34151822bede695293bd2,
title = "Learning from mixed OR method practice: the NINES case study",
abstract = "Despite continued interest in the use of mixed OR/MS methods, limited attention has been paid in the literature to generic lessons that could be gained from mixing methods in practice. Many organisational problems demand the use of a mixed method approach and thus recognising and sharing lessons could prove beneficial to both practitioners and researchers. This paper reports on an in-depth evaluation of a case study involving risk identification and quantification of the Northern Isles New Energy Solutions (NINES) project which sought to trial and plan a new energy system. The intervention involved a mixed method approach and client feedback on the efficacy of the approach was sought. The evaluation reported in this paper is carried out using a set of themes taken from the literature and seeks to highlight transferable lessons. The set of lessons that emerge are presented along with their implications for both general OR modelling practice and the specific situation of mixing OR/MS methods. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of the work and directions for future work which will be of interest to both practitioners and researchers interested in mixed method OR/MS work.",
keywords = "mixed methods, causal mapping, decision tree, case study , risk analysis, evaluation",
author = "Susan Howick and Fran Ackermann and Lesley Walls and John Quigley and Tom Houghton",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.omega.2016.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "70--81",
journal = "Omega",
issn = "0305-0483",

}

Learning from mixed OR method practice : the NINES case study. / Howick, Susan; Ackermann, Fran; Walls, Lesley; Quigley, John; Houghton, Tom.

In: Omega, Vol. 69, 01.06.2017, p. 70-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning from mixed OR method practice

T2 - Omega

AU - Howick, Susan

AU - Ackermann, Fran

AU - Walls, Lesley

AU - Quigley, John

AU - Houghton, Tom

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Despite continued interest in the use of mixed OR/MS methods, limited attention has been paid in the literature to generic lessons that could be gained from mixing methods in practice. Many organisational problems demand the use of a mixed method approach and thus recognising and sharing lessons could prove beneficial to both practitioners and researchers. This paper reports on an in-depth evaluation of a case study involving risk identification and quantification of the Northern Isles New Energy Solutions (NINES) project which sought to trial and plan a new energy system. The intervention involved a mixed method approach and client feedback on the efficacy of the approach was sought. The evaluation reported in this paper is carried out using a set of themes taken from the literature and seeks to highlight transferable lessons. The set of lessons that emerge are presented along with their implications for both general OR modelling practice and the specific situation of mixing OR/MS methods. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of the work and directions for future work which will be of interest to both practitioners and researchers interested in mixed method OR/MS work.

AB - Despite continued interest in the use of mixed OR/MS methods, limited attention has been paid in the literature to generic lessons that could be gained from mixing methods in practice. Many organisational problems demand the use of a mixed method approach and thus recognising and sharing lessons could prove beneficial to both practitioners and researchers. This paper reports on an in-depth evaluation of a case study involving risk identification and quantification of the Northern Isles New Energy Solutions (NINES) project which sought to trial and plan a new energy system. The intervention involved a mixed method approach and client feedback on the efficacy of the approach was sought. The evaluation reported in this paper is carried out using a set of themes taken from the literature and seeks to highlight transferable lessons. The set of lessons that emerge are presented along with their implications for both general OR modelling practice and the specific situation of mixing OR/MS methods. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of the work and directions for future work which will be of interest to both practitioners and researchers interested in mixed method OR/MS work.

KW - mixed methods

KW - causal mapping

KW - decision tree

KW - case study

KW - risk analysis

KW - evaluation

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03050483

U2 - 10.1016/j.omega.2016.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.omega.2016.08.003

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 70

EP - 81

JO - Omega

JF - Omega

SN - 0305-0483

ER -