Law as a narrative: legal pluralism and resisting Euro-American (intellectual) property law through stories

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Indigenous peoples are today contesting the universalisation of Western intellectual property law, in which intellectual property rights have expanded to materialise abstract ideas so that individuals can gain private ownership of them. It is argued here that the application of Western property law threatens the social and cultural integrity of indigenous peoples. These issues are considered within the context of the San and their struggle to gain cultural and land rights in the landscape of the Kalahari in Southern Africa.
Policy in the international community towards indigenous peoples has evolved to an acceptance of the recognition of indigenous peoples’ self determination rights in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In the light of these developments the paper examines the case of Hoodia and the San. Hoodia, an edible wild plant which can serve as an appetite suppressant was long known to the San before it was scientifically investigated by the South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). CSIR filed a patent application for its use without consulting or obtaining the consent of the San, and then signed a licence agreement for its further investigation and use with a foreign company. Publicity later encouraged the CSIR to enter into benefit sharing agreements with the San. However, when the focus shifted from using Hoodia as a drug to using it as a natural food supplement, the total market value and thus the absolute benefit share declined, while the international demand for Hoodia as a natural product exploded and poaching and illegal harvesting of the product became a problem. The San were able in 2007 to negotiate a new benefit sharing agreement specifically with the Hoodia farmers organized in the Southern African Hoodia Growers Association. Today it seems that a Hoodia growers’ benefit sharing agreement, while still bringing relatively modest benefits. might potentially be more lucrative than the initial benefit sharing agreement, but with proceeds distributed just to the farmers rather than the San as a wider community.
The paper explores the implications of these developments, using a socio-legal, anthropological and legal pluralist perspective, which allows for an exploration of how overlapping legal systems can interact with each other. This approach also encourages researchers to embrace the idea of a hybrid legal space where law-making consists of a praxis that interlocks a whole range of legal actors ranging from international institutions to daily localised legal actors.
LanguageEnglish
Pages53-78
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law
Volume42
Issue number61
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

intellectual property
pluralism
narrative
Law
farmer
foreign company
publicity
Southern Africa
management counsulting
self-determination
right of ownership
legal system
license
patent
supplement
community
integrity
UNO
acceptance
food

Cite this

@article{0f597651bd924e5a9d66aa4dc437ec2b,
title = "Law as a narrative: legal pluralism and resisting Euro-American (intellectual) property law through stories",
abstract = "Indigenous peoples are today contesting the universalisation of Western intellectual property law, in which intellectual property rights have expanded to materialise abstract ideas so that individuals can gain private ownership of them. It is argued here that the application of Western property law threatens the social and cultural integrity of indigenous peoples. These issues are considered within the context of the San and their struggle to gain cultural and land rights in the landscape of the Kalahari in Southern Africa.Policy in the international community towards indigenous peoples has evolved to an acceptance of the recognition of indigenous peoples’ self determination rights in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In the light of these developments the paper examines the case of Hoodia and the San. Hoodia, an edible wild plant which can serve as an appetite suppressant was long known to the San before it was scientifically investigated by the South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). CSIR filed a patent application for its use without consulting or obtaining the consent of the San, and then signed a licence agreement for its further investigation and use with a foreign company. Publicity later encouraged the CSIR to enter into benefit sharing agreements with the San. However, when the focus shifted from using Hoodia as a drug to using it as a natural food supplement, the total market value and thus the absolute benefit share declined, while the international demand for Hoodia as a natural product exploded and poaching and illegal harvesting of the product became a problem. The San were able in 2007 to negotiate a new benefit sharing agreement specifically with the Hoodia farmers organized in the Southern African Hoodia Growers Association. Today it seems that a Hoodia growers’ benefit sharing agreement, while still bringing relatively modest benefits. might potentially be more lucrative than the initial benefit sharing agreement, but with proceeds distributed just to the farmers rather than the San as a wider community.The paper explores the implications of these developments, using a socio-legal, anthropological and legal pluralist perspective, which allows for an exploration of how overlapping legal systems can interact with each other. This approach also encourages researchers to embrace the idea of a hybrid legal space where law-making consists of a praxis that interlocks a whole range of legal actors ranging from international institutions to daily localised legal actors.",
author = "Saskia Vermeylen",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1080/07329113.2010.10756642",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "53--78",
journal = "Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law",
issn = "0732-9113",
number = "61",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Law as a narrative

T2 - Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law

AU - Vermeylen, Saskia

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Indigenous peoples are today contesting the universalisation of Western intellectual property law, in which intellectual property rights have expanded to materialise abstract ideas so that individuals can gain private ownership of them. It is argued here that the application of Western property law threatens the social and cultural integrity of indigenous peoples. These issues are considered within the context of the San and their struggle to gain cultural and land rights in the landscape of the Kalahari in Southern Africa.Policy in the international community towards indigenous peoples has evolved to an acceptance of the recognition of indigenous peoples’ self determination rights in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In the light of these developments the paper examines the case of Hoodia and the San. Hoodia, an edible wild plant which can serve as an appetite suppressant was long known to the San before it was scientifically investigated by the South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). CSIR filed a patent application for its use without consulting or obtaining the consent of the San, and then signed a licence agreement for its further investigation and use with a foreign company. Publicity later encouraged the CSIR to enter into benefit sharing agreements with the San. However, when the focus shifted from using Hoodia as a drug to using it as a natural food supplement, the total market value and thus the absolute benefit share declined, while the international demand for Hoodia as a natural product exploded and poaching and illegal harvesting of the product became a problem. The San were able in 2007 to negotiate a new benefit sharing agreement specifically with the Hoodia farmers organized in the Southern African Hoodia Growers Association. Today it seems that a Hoodia growers’ benefit sharing agreement, while still bringing relatively modest benefits. might potentially be more lucrative than the initial benefit sharing agreement, but with proceeds distributed just to the farmers rather than the San as a wider community.The paper explores the implications of these developments, using a socio-legal, anthropological and legal pluralist perspective, which allows for an exploration of how overlapping legal systems can interact with each other. This approach also encourages researchers to embrace the idea of a hybrid legal space where law-making consists of a praxis that interlocks a whole range of legal actors ranging from international institutions to daily localised legal actors.

AB - Indigenous peoples are today contesting the universalisation of Western intellectual property law, in which intellectual property rights have expanded to materialise abstract ideas so that individuals can gain private ownership of them. It is argued here that the application of Western property law threatens the social and cultural integrity of indigenous peoples. These issues are considered within the context of the San and their struggle to gain cultural and land rights in the landscape of the Kalahari in Southern Africa.Policy in the international community towards indigenous peoples has evolved to an acceptance of the recognition of indigenous peoples’ self determination rights in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In the light of these developments the paper examines the case of Hoodia and the San. Hoodia, an edible wild plant which can serve as an appetite suppressant was long known to the San before it was scientifically investigated by the South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR). CSIR filed a patent application for its use without consulting or obtaining the consent of the San, and then signed a licence agreement for its further investigation and use with a foreign company. Publicity later encouraged the CSIR to enter into benefit sharing agreements with the San. However, when the focus shifted from using Hoodia as a drug to using it as a natural food supplement, the total market value and thus the absolute benefit share declined, while the international demand for Hoodia as a natural product exploded and poaching and illegal harvesting of the product became a problem. The San were able in 2007 to negotiate a new benefit sharing agreement specifically with the Hoodia farmers organized in the Southern African Hoodia Growers Association. Today it seems that a Hoodia growers’ benefit sharing agreement, while still bringing relatively modest benefits. might potentially be more lucrative than the initial benefit sharing agreement, but with proceeds distributed just to the farmers rather than the San as a wider community.The paper explores the implications of these developments, using a socio-legal, anthropological and legal pluralist perspective, which allows for an exploration of how overlapping legal systems can interact with each other. This approach also encourages researchers to embrace the idea of a hybrid legal space where law-making consists of a praxis that interlocks a whole range of legal actors ranging from international institutions to daily localised legal actors.

U2 - 10.1080/07329113.2010.10756642

DO - 10.1080/07329113.2010.10756642

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 53

EP - 78

JO - Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law

JF - Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law

SN - 0732-9113

IS - 61

ER -