Laissez faire and the clean development mechanism: determinants of project implementation in Indian states, 2003-2011

Patrick Bayer, Johannes Urpelainen, Alice Xu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

India is the world's second-largest host of projects implemented under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). There is, however, considerable variation in the distribution of CDM projects implemented across different Indian states. While a large body of the literature examines cross-national variation in the implementation of CDM projects, few studies have analyzed the determinants of sub-national variation in different national contexts. We theorize that given India's laissez-faire approach to CDM project implementation the availability of profitable climate mitigation opportunities and the political stability are two factors that promote CDM project implementation. Using sub-national data collected from a variety of sources, we conduct systematic analysis that provides empirical support for a set of hypotheses regarding the effects of these variables on project implementation. First, we find that states with a lot of public electricity-generating capacity and industrial capital implement more CDM projects than other states. Additionally, project developers rarely propose CDM projects during election years as a result of high levels of political uncertainty associated with those years. Our findings show that India's liberal approach prevents the central government from using the CDM to promote sustainable development in less developed states. In India and other host countries where coordinated national policies to maximize their gains from CDM projects is absent, there is a paucity of project implementation in states that need it the most.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1687-1701
Number of pages15
JournalClean Technologies and Environmental Policy
Volume16
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

clean development mechanism
Sustainable development
Electricity
Availability
Uncertainty
project
Kyoto Protocol
election
electricity
sustainable development
mitigation

Keywords

  • clean development mechanism
  • climate policy
  • India
  • international institutions
  • sub-national variation

Cite this

@article{ce28ab6fa1654e9192faaacff8ed4976,
title = "Laissez faire and the clean development mechanism: determinants of project implementation in Indian states, 2003-2011",
abstract = "India is the world's second-largest host of projects implemented under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). There is, however, considerable variation in the distribution of CDM projects implemented across different Indian states. While a large body of the literature examines cross-national variation in the implementation of CDM projects, few studies have analyzed the determinants of sub-national variation in different national contexts. We theorize that given India's laissez-faire approach to CDM project implementation the availability of profitable climate mitigation opportunities and the political stability are two factors that promote CDM project implementation. Using sub-national data collected from a variety of sources, we conduct systematic analysis that provides empirical support for a set of hypotheses regarding the effects of these variables on project implementation. First, we find that states with a lot of public electricity-generating capacity and industrial capital implement more CDM projects than other states. Additionally, project developers rarely propose CDM projects during election years as a result of high levels of political uncertainty associated with those years. Our findings show that India's liberal approach prevents the central government from using the CDM to promote sustainable development in less developed states. In India and other host countries where coordinated national policies to maximize their gains from CDM projects is absent, there is a paucity of project implementation in states that need it the most.",
keywords = "clean development mechanism, climate policy, India, international institutions, sub-national variation",
author = "Patrick Bayer and Johannes Urpelainen and Alice Xu",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10098-014-0746-3",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1687--1701",
journal = "Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy",
issn = "1618-954X",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag",
number = "8",

}

Laissez faire and the clean development mechanism : determinants of project implementation in Indian states, 2003-2011. / Bayer, Patrick; Urpelainen, Johannes; Xu, Alice.

In: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, Vol. 16, No. 8, 01.01.2014, p. 1687-1701.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laissez faire and the clean development mechanism

T2 - Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

AU - Bayer, Patrick

AU - Urpelainen, Johannes

AU - Xu, Alice

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - India is the world's second-largest host of projects implemented under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). There is, however, considerable variation in the distribution of CDM projects implemented across different Indian states. While a large body of the literature examines cross-national variation in the implementation of CDM projects, few studies have analyzed the determinants of sub-national variation in different national contexts. We theorize that given India's laissez-faire approach to CDM project implementation the availability of profitable climate mitigation opportunities and the political stability are two factors that promote CDM project implementation. Using sub-national data collected from a variety of sources, we conduct systematic analysis that provides empirical support for a set of hypotheses regarding the effects of these variables on project implementation. First, we find that states with a lot of public electricity-generating capacity and industrial capital implement more CDM projects than other states. Additionally, project developers rarely propose CDM projects during election years as a result of high levels of political uncertainty associated with those years. Our findings show that India's liberal approach prevents the central government from using the CDM to promote sustainable development in less developed states. In India and other host countries where coordinated national policies to maximize their gains from CDM projects is absent, there is a paucity of project implementation in states that need it the most.

AB - India is the world's second-largest host of projects implemented under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). There is, however, considerable variation in the distribution of CDM projects implemented across different Indian states. While a large body of the literature examines cross-national variation in the implementation of CDM projects, few studies have analyzed the determinants of sub-national variation in different national contexts. We theorize that given India's laissez-faire approach to CDM project implementation the availability of profitable climate mitigation opportunities and the political stability are two factors that promote CDM project implementation. Using sub-national data collected from a variety of sources, we conduct systematic analysis that provides empirical support for a set of hypotheses regarding the effects of these variables on project implementation. First, we find that states with a lot of public electricity-generating capacity and industrial capital implement more CDM projects than other states. Additionally, project developers rarely propose CDM projects during election years as a result of high levels of political uncertainty associated with those years. Our findings show that India's liberal approach prevents the central government from using the CDM to promote sustainable development in less developed states. In India and other host countries where coordinated national policies to maximize their gains from CDM projects is absent, there is a paucity of project implementation in states that need it the most.

KW - clean development mechanism

KW - climate policy

KW - India

KW - international institutions

KW - sub-national variation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920705509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10098-014-0746-3

DO - 10.1007/s10098-014-0746-3

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1687

EP - 1701

JO - Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

JF - Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

SN - 1618-954X

IS - 8

ER -