Abstract
The Swedish Labour Court has decided the Laval case a judgment of 2 December 2009. It has applied to individuals the principles of EU law relating to the liability of the State in order to award compensation for damages a trade union for taking a 'illegal collective action. The wide interpretation of European law given by Swedish courts is problematic in several respects. The renewed European constitutional framework, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, puts into perspective not only the decision of the Swedish Court, but also the same Laval judgment of the Court of Justice. In light of this, the authors wonder whether the Swedish Court has adopted a correct interpretation with reference to the issue of liability in case of breach of EU law, and discuss some of the broader issues raised by the judgment.
| Translated title of the contribution | The prospect of the European Union: give priority to the domestic market or to revise the doctrine Laval? |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 433-446 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Giornale di diritto del lavoro e di relazioni industriali |
| Issue number | 131 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Swedish labour court
- European law
- court of justice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The prospect of the European Union: give priority to the domestic market or to revise the doctrine Laval?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver